west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "宋华勇" 3 results
  • 无痛胃肠镜检查患者麻醉苏醒期并发症及护理

    【摘要】 目的 探讨无痛胃肠镜检查麻醉苏醒期常见并发症及其护理。 方法 对2003年7月-2009年3月行无痛胃肠镜检查术患者在麻醉苏醒期出现的各种并发症状况及护理方法进行分析总结。 结果 呼吸道不通畅导致的低氧血症是行无痛胃肠镜检查术患者在麻醉苏醒期间最常见的并发症,有756例,其次为因呼吸道分泌物致呛咳(421例)、恶心呕吐(131例)、低血糖(45例)等。经过积极处理后,无一例患者死亡。 结论 低氧血症是行无痛胃肠镜检查术患者在麻醉苏醒期间最常见的并发症,其次为因呼吸道分泌物致呛咳、恶心呕吐、低血糖等。加强麻醉苏醒期的护理可以预防和减少麻醉相关并发症的发生。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 自控镇静镇痛在胃肠内镜诊疗中的应用

    胃肠内镜作为胃肠道疾患的重要诊疗手段,其侵袭性操作所带来的痛苦和紧张焦虑等是妨碍许多患者接受内镜检查的主要原因。实施镇静镇痛会增加患者的耐受性,抵抗焦虑并减少疼痛不适,但同时也增加了心肺系统并发症的风险及检查的费用。因此根据不同患者进行个性化镇静镇痛的自控方式被引入胃肠内镜诊疗的镇静镇痛中,其使用专用的输液泵,通过易于操纵的按钮,由患者自己决定用药时间及药量,体现了按需给药和个体化用药的原则。自控镇静镇痛较传统的镇静镇痛模式可为胃肠内镜诊疗提供更为安全高效的镇静镇痛。

    Release date:2017-05-18 01:09 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Patient-controlled Analgesia and Sedation with Remifentanil and Propofol for Colonoscopy in Elderly Patients

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of patient-controlled analgesia and sedation (PCAS) with propofol and remifentanil for colonoscopy in elderly patients. MethodsSixty elderly patients preparing for painless colonoscopy between May and September 2015 were randomly allocated into PCAS group and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) group with 30 patients in each. In the PCAS group, the mixture of remifentanil and propofol at 0.6 mL/(kg·h) was pumped continuously after an initial bolus of 0.05 mL/kg mixture. The examination began three minutes after the infusion was finished. Patients could press the self-control button. Each bolus delivered 1 mL and the lockout time was 1 minute. In the TIVA group, patients received fentanyl at 1 μg/kg and midazolam at 0.02 mg/kg intravenously, and accepted intravenous propofol at 0.8-1.0 mg/kg two minutes later. The examination began when the patients lost consciousness. ResultsA significant decline of mean arterial blood pressure was detected within each group after anesthesia (P < 0.05). The decrease of mean blood pressure in the TIVA group was more significant than that in the PCAS group (P < 0.05). The heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation and respiratory rate decreased significantly after anesthesia in both the two groups (P < 0.05), while end-tidal CO2 increased after anesthesia without any significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The induction time, time to insert the colonoscope to ileocecus, and total examination time were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). As for the time from the end of examination to OAA/S score of 5 and to Aldrete score of 9, the PCAS group was significantly shorter than the TIVA group (P < 0.05). ConclusionPCAS with remifentanil and propofol can provide sufficient analgesia, better hemodynamic stability, lighter sedation, and faster recovery compared with TIVA.

    Release date:2016-10-28 02:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content