Objective To explore the surgical feasibil ity and cl inical outcome of transpedicle screw fixation in treatment of atlantoaxial instabil ity and dislocation. Methods From January 2007 to June 2009, 16 patients with atlantoaxial instabil ity and dislocation were treated with transpedicle screw fixation. There were 13 males and 3 females, with a mean age of 42 years (range, 24-61 years). The transpedicle screw fixation was employed in 5 patients with old odontoid fracture (4 of Anderson type II and 1 of type III), in 4 patients with fresh odontoid fracture, in 4 patients with traumatic disruption of transverse atlantal l igament, and in 3 patients with congenital odontoid disconnection for atlantoaxial instabil ity. All patients had symptoms of cervical pain and l imition of cervical motion, 10 patients compl icated by dyscinesia and hypoesthesia of extremities. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score before operation was from 5 to 13, with an average of 8.5. The image examination showed atlantoaxial instabil ity or dislocation in all patients. Granulated autogenous il ium (20-30 g) was placed onto the surface of the posterior arches of both atlas and axis in some patients with old fracture of odontoid process or disruption of transverse atlantal l igament. Results The mean operative time and bleeding amount were 1.6 hours (1.2-2.5 hours) and 100 mL (50-200 mL), respectively. All the incision healed by first intension. All patients were followed up for 3-18 months, with an average of 11.5 months. The JOA score 3 months after operation was from 12 to 17, with an average of 14.2. All screws were successfully placed in atlas and axis. No postoperative compl ications such as vertebral artery injury, dural rupture, exacerbation of neurological symptoms, wound infection, and broken srews were observed in 16 cases. Postoperative radiograph and CT showed that only one screw penetrated into vertebral canal, but there was no neurological symptoms. Bony fusion was observed after 6 to 18 months of operation, and atlantoaxial rotational function in all patients restored satisfactorily, but axial rotation was partially lost. Conclusion Transpedicle screw fixation in upper cervical spine for treatment of atlantoaxial instabil ity and dislocation is safe and rel iable
To cure patients suffering from atlanto-axial instability following old fracture of odontoid process concomitant with stenosis of lower end of cervical spinal canal, a new operative method was designed. It included atlanto-axial fusion by Gallie technique and resection of right half of the laminae of C3-C7 spine at one stage. A female of 63 years old was treated. She was admitted with neck pain and numbness of the upper and lower limbs. A history of neck injury was noted in enquiry. In physical examination showed the sensation of pain of the upper limbs was decreased and the muscle power of the upper and lower limbs ranged from III degree to IV degree. The X-ray film and MRI suggested that there was instability of the atlanto-axial joint with stenosis of 4th-6th cervical spinal canal. The operation was satisfactory. After operation, the patient was followed up for 11 months. The physical examination indicated that sensation of the upper limbs had recovered to normal and the muscle power of the upper limbs reached IV degree and that the lower limbs reached V degree and X-ray showed bony fusion of the atlanto-axial joint. The conclusions were: 1. The stability of atlanto-axial joint was reconstructed with expanding of the spinal canal at the same time. 2. The duration, risk and cost of the therapy were reduced, and maintenance of the stability of the cervical spine throughout whole period of treatment was recommended.
ObjectiveTo investigate reliability and short-term effectiveness of axis laminar screws for reducible atlantoaxial dislocation (RAAD).MethodsA clinical data of 41 patients with RAAD who were admitted between February 2013 and February 2018 and met the inclusion criteria was retrospectively analyzed. The atlases in all patients were fixated by lateral mass screws, and the axes were fixed by laminar screws in 13 cases (LS group) and by pedicle screws in 28 cases (PS group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, and preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The effectiveness was estimated by post-operative JOA score; and the accuracy of the axis screw, atlantoaxial bone graft fusion, and the fixation stability were examined by X-ray film and CT.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-17 months (mean, 13.8 months) in LS group and 12-20 months (mean 14.1 months) in PS group, and the difference in follow-up time was not significant (Z=−0.704, P=0.482). At last follow-up, JOA scores were 13.9±1.6 in LS group and 14.3±1.8 in PS group, which significantly improved when compared with the pre-operative scores in the two groups (t=−9.033, P=0.000; t=−15.835, P=0.000); while no significant difference was found between the two groups (t=−0.630, P=0.532). Twenty-five screws of 26 screws in LS group and 54 screws of 56 screws in PS group were implanted accurately, with no significant difference in the accuracy of the axis screw between the two groups (Z=−0.061, P=0.951). All patients obtained atlantoaxial bone graft fusion, except 1 case in PS group. There was no significant difference in the atlantoaxial bone graft fusion between the two groups (Z=−0.681, P=0.496).ConclusionFor RAAD, Axis laminar screws can maintain the atlantoaxial primary stability and had a good short-term effectiveness. So, it could be an alternative and reliable technique for axis screw.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of computer-assisted and robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation for the treatment of reversible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). MethodsThe clinical data of 42 patients with reversible AAD admitted between January 2020 and June 2023 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed, of whom 23 patients were treated with computer-assisted surgery (computer group) and 19 patients were treated with Mazor X spinal robot-assisted surgery (robot group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, T value of bone mineral density, body mass index, etiology, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Dysfunction Index (NDI) between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, screw implantation time, intraoperative blood loss, hand and wrist radiation exposure, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Gertzbein classification was used to evaluate the accuracy of screw implantation. JOA score and NDI were used to evaluate the function before operation, at 3 days after operation, and at last follow-up. At last follow-up, the status of screws and bone fusion were observed by neck three-dimensional CT. Results The operation time and hand and wrist radiation exposure of the computer group were significantly longer than those of the robot group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the screw implantation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 11-24 months, with an average of 19.6 months. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of screw implantation between the two groups (P>0.05). Except for 1 case of incision infection in the computer group, which improved after antibiotic treatment, there was no complication such as nerve and vertebral artery injury, screw loosening, or breakage in the two groups. The JOA score and NDI significantly improved in both groups at 3 days after operation and at last follow-up (P<0.05) compared to those before operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, 21 patients (91.3%) in the computer group and 18 patients (94.7%) in the robot group achieved satisfactory atlantoaxial fusion, and there was no significant difference in the fusion rate between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionComputer-assisted or robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation is safe and effective, and robotic navigation shortens operation time and reduces radiation exposure.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted and traditional freehand screw placement in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. Methods The clinical data of 55 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation who met the selection criteria between January 2021 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different screw placement methods, they were divided into the traditional group (using the traditional freedhand screw placement, 31 cases) and the robot group (using the Mazor X robot-assisted screw placement, 24 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, etiology, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cervical spine Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, operation cost, and intraoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS score and cervical spine JOA score were used to evaluate the improvement of pain and cervical spinal cord function before operation and at 1 month after operation. CT examination was performed at 3 days after operation, and the accuracy of screw placement was evaluated according to Neo grading criteria. Results All the 55 patients successfully completed the operation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and operation cost in the robot group were significantly higher than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). A total of 220 C1 and C2 pedicle screws were inserted in the two groups, and 94 were inserted in the robot group, with an accuracy rate of 95.7%, among them, 2 were inserted by traditional freehand screw placement due to bleeding caused by intraoperative slip. And 126 pedicle screws were inserted in the traditional group, with an accuracy rate of 87.3%, which was significantly lower than that in the robot group (P<0.05). There were 1 case of venous plexus injury in the robot group and 3 cases in the traditional group, which improved after pressure hemostasis treatment. No other intraoperative complication such as vertebral artery injury or spinal cord injury occurred in both groups. All patients were followed up 4-16 months with an average of 6.6 months, and there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). Postoperative neck pain significantly relieved in both groups, and neurological symptoms relieved to varying degrees. The VAS score and cervicle spine JOA score of both groups significantly improved at 1 month after operation when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the score change between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation, the accuracy of robot-assisted screw placement is superior to the traditional freedhand screw placement.