目的 总结同理心在冠心病重症监护室（CCU）患者家属沟通中的应用及效果。 方法 选择2010年4月－5月入住CCU的患者100例，按入院先后顺序前50例设定为对照组，后50例设定为观察组；对照组采用传统常规方法与患者家属进行沟通，观察组应用同理心理念与患者家属沟通。观察两组患者家属在非探视时间到访次数、纠纷次数和CCU护理工作满意度情况。 结果 观察组患者家属较对照组在非探视时间到访次数、纠纷发生次数少，而满意度较对照组高，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 应用同理心与CCU患者家属进行沟通，可增加医患间的理解和信任，减少非探视时间内家属到访次数，有利于维护医院正常的工作秩序，同时减少纠纷的发生，提高了护理服务满意度。
目的 探讨心脏外科体外循环术后留置心外膜临时起搏导线的康复经验。 方法 选取 2015 年 9 月至 2016 年 4 月 69 例体外循环术后留置心外膜临时起搏导线患者，其中男 26 例、女 43 例，平均年龄（50.2±11.5）岁。予术前及术后干预措施、出院指导和随访，评价康复效果。 结果 患者术后平均住院时间（9.8±2.6）d，69 例患者均顺利出院，其中 57 例患者顺利拔除心外膜临时起搏器导线，1 例患者因Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞继续留置临时起搏器电极，11 例患者残留临时起搏导线出院，出院后两周随访发现 2 例患者的临时起搏导线体内残端露出体表。 结论 心外膜临时起搏电极是心脏外科术后常见的风险防范手段之一，掌握临时起搏器导线的管理及临时起搏器应用的相关知识，合理管理能有效地降低术后并发症的发生，可促进患者术后康复。做好患者宣教，避免因沟通不畅导致的医患纠纷发生。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of rehabilitation exercise on exercise tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with non-acute coronary syndrome (non-ACS) after interventional therapy.MethodsA total of 102 patients with coronary heart disease and non-ACS in our hospital from December 2018 to June 2019 were selected and randomly divided into a control group (n=51, 30 males and 21 females with an average age of 56.1±4.8 years) and a trial group (n=51, 34 males and 17 females with an average age of 55.1±4.9 years). The control group received routine treatment, while the trial group received regular supervised rehabilitation exercise on the basis of routine treatment. Patients were followed up for 6 months to compare the differences in cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, blood lipid, fasting blood glucose), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), adverse lifestyle changes and treatment compliance between the two groups after treatment.ResultsThe difference of 6MWD between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the trial group, 6MWD increased after intervention compared with that before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Comparison of total cholesterol (TC), high density liptein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density liptein cholesterol (LDL-C) and fasting blood glucose in the trial group before and after intervention showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The differences in TC, HDL-C and LDL-C in the control group before and after intervention were statistically significant (P<0.05). It was statistically significant in dietary compliance rate, smoking cessation rate and alcohol cessation rate between the two groups (P<0.05); the differences in the dietary compliance and drug compliance of the trial group before and after intervention were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionRegular supervised rehabilitation exercise can significantly improve the exercise tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors of non-ACS patients after coronary intervention treatment, so as to improve the quality of life and long-term prognosis of non-ACS patients, which is worthy of clinical application.
Objective To compare the effect and degree of satisfaction of different analgesic interventions for tubes of pericardium and mediastinum removal after cardiac surgery. Methods From December 2017 to June 2018, 94 patients undergoing open heart cardiac surgery with tubes of pericardium and mediastinum were allocated randomly into three groups including a group A (32 patients), a group B (35 patients), and a group C (27 patients). In the group A, intravenous Dezocine was given as analgesics. In the group B, intravenous Dezocine plus oral ibuprofen were given. In the group C, interventions of group B plus specific nursing guidance were given. With the help of visual analogue scale (VAS), scores of pain during and after the tubes removal were collected. The degree of satisfaction and other adverse effects were also recorded. Results The VAS scores and fading time of pain in the group B were significantly lower than those of the group A (P<0.017). The score of sleeping was better in the group B as well. The VAS scores and fading time of pain in the group C were also significantly lower than those of the group A, and the scores of mood, activity as well as degree of satisfaction were all higher than those in the group A (P<0.017). The scores of activity and degree of satisfaction in the group C were higher compared with the group B (P<0.017). Conclusion Combination of intravenous Dezocine and oral ibuprofen seems to be more effective than each individual. Professional and specific nursing guidance could increase the degree of satisfaction for chest tube removal after cardiac surgery.