ObjectiveTo investigate the value of pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PRVEP) and sweep pattern visual evoked potential (SPVEP) in evaluating the visual function of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).MethodsA retrospective clinical trial. A total of 38 monocular CSC patients were enrolled from March 2016 to December2018 in Heping Hospital Affiliated Changzhi Medical College. There were 34 males and 4 females with the mean age of 40.0±5.2 years. All patients undergo PRVEP detection in both the acute phase (disease course ≤ 3 months) and the clinical cure phase (disease course ≤ 6 months) using the German Roland electrophysiological RETIport system.The stimulation pattern adopted a checkerboard with 1.00° and 0.25° stimulation angles. The P100 peak amplitude and peak time were observed. SPVEP inspection equipment and methods were the same as PRVEP, and the spatial frequency was 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 22 cpd. The difference between SPVEP vision and subjective vision were compared. The PRVEP peak amplitude, peak time and SPVEP amplitude and phase of the affected eye and the contralateral eye were compared by paired t test; the subjective vision and SPVEP visual acuity of the affected eye and the contralateral eye were compared by Wilcoxon paired rank test; Pearson product-moment correlation analysis was performed on SPVEP vision.ResultsIn the acute phase, the peak amplitude of P100 in the affected eye was lower than that in the contralateral eye (t=30.26, 13.59), and the peak time was prolonged (t=－19.89, －29.41). The difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01); in clinically cured period, the P100 peak amplitude (t=1.49, －0.57) and peak time (t=－1.22, －1.84) of the affected eye and the contralateral eye showed no significant difference (P＞0.05). In the acute phase, the difference in SPVEP amplitude between the affected eye and the contralateral eye with different spatial frequencies was statistically significant (P＜0.01); the phase of the affected eye and the contralateral eye were compared about the spatial frequency 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 cpd, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01). During the clinical cure period, the spatial frequency of 6, 8, 12, 16 cpd, the SPVEP amplitude of the affected eye and the contralateral eye, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01); on the spatial frequency of 6, 8, 12 cpd, the phase of SPVEP was compared between the affected eye and the contralateral eye, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01). During the acute phase and the clinical cure phase, the SPVEP visual acuity of the affected eye was lower than that of the contralateral eye, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01); during the acute phase and clinical cure phase, the SPVEP visual acuity of the affected eye and the contralateral eye were lower than the subjective vision. The difference was statistically significant (acute phase: Z =－5.38, －3.00; P＜0.001, 0.003; clinical cure phase: Z=－5.36, －5.38; P＜0.001,＜0.001). In the acute phase, the subjective visual acuity of the affected eye was positively correlated with SPVEP visual acuity (r=0.847, P＜0.001).ConclusionsPRVEP and SPVEP are useful for objectively assessing the visual function of the patients with CSC. Especially, the slight and potential visual impairment in CSC can been detected by SPVEP.
ObjectiveTo investigate the bone repair and regeneration abilities of biomimetic mineralized collagen bone graft material and autologous bone marrow in rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion model.MethodsTwenty-seven 20-week-old male New Zealand white rabbits were used to establish the posterolateral spinal fusion model of L5 and L6 segments by stripping the transverse process and exposing cancellous bone with electric burr. The rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups, 9 in each group. Groups A, B, and C were implanted 1.5 mL autologous iliac bone, 1.5 mL (30 mm×10 mm×5 mm) biomimetic mineralized collagen bone graft material, and 1.5 mL (30 mm×10 mm×5 mm) biomimetic mineralized collagen bone graft material and autologous bone marrow in each bone defect. At 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation, the apparent hardness of the bone grafting area was observed by manipulation method, in order to evaluate bone graft fusion effects. Three animals were sacrificed in each group at each time point, the vertebral body specimens were excised and the bone defect repair and fusion were observed by X-ray films, and three-dimensional CT examination was performed to evaluate whether new bone was formed in the body. HE staining was performed at each time point to observe the formation of new bone and the repair and fusion of bone defects.ResultsThe manipulation test showed that bone graft fusion was not found in all groups at 4 weeks after operation; 3 (50.0%), 2 (33.3%), and 4 (66.7%) of groups A, B, and C reached bone graft fusion at 8 weeks after operation; 5 (83.3%), 4 (66.7%), and 5 (83.3%) of groups A, B, and C reached bone graft fusion at 12 weeks after operation; the fusion rate of group C was similar to that of group A, and all higher than that of group B. X-ray film observation showed that the fusion rate of group C at 8 and 12 weeks after operation was higher than that of group B, which was similar to group A. Three-dimensional CT observation showed that the degree of bone fusion in group C was better than that in group B, which was close to group A. HE staining observation showed that large area of mature lamellar bone coverage appeared in the bone graft area of groups A, B, and C at 12 weeks after operation, the material was completely degraded, and the marginal boundary of the host bone disappeared and tightly combined.ConclusionBiomimetic mineralized collagen bone graft material mixed with autologous bone marrow has good osteoinduction and osteogenesis guidance. Compared with biomimetic mineralized collagen bone graft material, it has better and faster osteogenesis effect, which is close to autologous bone transplantation.