Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Lianpu granule (LPG) in the treatment of common cold (Feng-Re syndrome). Methods The clinical trials were conducted by good clinical practice (GCP). In the phaseⅡ, a double-blind controlled trial involving 48 patients with common cold (Feng-Re syndrome) allocated by a random number table to receive LPG (n=24) or compound oral liquid of Shuanghuanglian (SHL) (n=24) as conducted; the other 80 patients included in the phase Ⅲ, multi-center randomized and controlled trial were divided into the LPG group (n=60) and SHL group (n=20) by a random number table. We didn’t evaluate the allocation concealment. LPG was administered as a dose of 8 g, three times a day, and SHL, as a dose of 10 ml, three times a day. The treatment duration for both groups was 3 days. All data were analyzed by using stata 7.0 for per-protocol population. Results In the Lianpu granule group, the good improvement rates were 90.00% (18/20) and 85.00% (51/60), and the improvement rates were 95.00% (19/20) and 98.33% (59/60); the good improvement rates for traditional Chinese medicine syndromes were 85.00% (17/20) and 85.00% (51/60), and the improvement rates were 95.00% (19/20) and 98.33% (59/60); the good improvement rates for fever were 85.00% (17/20) and 86.05% (37/43), and the improvement rates were 95.00% (19/20) and 95.35% (41/43) in the phase Ⅱ and Ⅲ respectively. Meanwhile for the compound oral liquid of SHL group, the good improvement rates were 85.71% (18/21) and 80.00% (16/20), and the improvement rates were 95.24% (20/21) and 95.00% (19/20); the good improvement rates for traditional Chinese medicine syndromes were 85.71% (18/21) and 80.00% (16/20), and the improvement rates were 95.24% (20/21) and 95.00% (19/20); the good improvement rates for fever were 85.71% (18/21) and 80.00% (12/15), and the improvement rates were 90.48% (19/21) and 93.33% (14/15) in the phase Ⅱ and Ⅲ respectively. No significant differences were seen between LPG and SHL groups on treatment duration, clinical effect and improvement rate for fever (all P ＞0.05). No adverse effects were seen in this study. Conclusion LPG has showed a definite clinical effect on common cold (Feng-Re syndrome) with no observed adverse effects.
Objective To assess the effect and safety of Dalitong Granule in the treatment of the Piman syndrome (functional dyspepsia). Method The double-blind, double-dummy and randomized controlled method was adopted. 120 patients were randomized to the treatment group (n=90, Dalitong Granule 6 g, tid) and the control group (n=30, treated with cisapride 5 mg, tid). The therapeutic course for both groups was 2 weeks. Results All the results were analyzed on the basis of intention-to-treat and per-protocol population. In the treatment group, the markedly effective rates were 62.37% and 64.45% respectively. The effective rates were 99.55% and 96-67% respectively. In the control group, the markedly effective rates were 58-08% and 60.00% respectively. The effective rates were 90.33% and 93.33% respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). For effects on Piman syndrome, in the treatment group, the markedly effective rates were 53.76% and 55.56% respectively. The effective rates were 86.02% and 88.89% respectively. In the control group, the markedly effective rates were 48.38% and 50.00% respectively. The effective rates were 80.64% and 83.33% respectively. The results showed no statistical significance difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). For effects on gastric emptying function (PP population), in the treatment group, the markedly effective rate and effective rate were 72.42% and 79.32%. In the control group those were 64.28% and 64.28%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). ITT and PP analysis revealed similar results. No adverse effect was found in the observation. Conclusions Dalitong granule has the same clinical effect as cisapride with no obvious toxic-adverse effects.
Background To prove the effect of Jinyebaidu Granule (JYBDG) in treating the Disease of Wind-heat Attacking the Lung (type of heat pathogen invading the defensive Qi of the lung) and objectively evaluate its safety. Methods The muti-center,double-blinded, double-dummy and randomized controlled method was adopted to observe 200 patients who were divided into the treatment group (n=100, treated with JYBDG 10 g, three times a day) and the control group (n=100, treated with Shuanghuanglian Granule 5 g, three times a day). The therapeutic course for both groups was 5 days. Results According to ITT (intention-to-treat) and PP (per-protocol population), In the treatment group, the markedly effective rate was 72.64% and 75.00% respectively, and effective rate was 94.00% and 96.00% respectively, while in the control group the markedly effective rate was 68.63% and 68.00% respectively, and effective rate was 90.20% and 90.00% respectively, no significant difference was found between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). For therapeutic effects on TCM syndromes, In the treatment group, the markedly effective rate was 71.70% and 74.00% respectively, and effective rate was 93.45% and 96.00 % respectively, while in the control group the markedly effective rate was 66.67% and 68.00% respectively, and effective rate was 89.22% and 90.00% respectively, also showed insignificantly difference (Pgt;0.05). No adverse effect was found in the observation. Conclusion JYBDG shows a definite clinical effect with no obvious toxic-adverse effects.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of TanReqing Injection in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to observe its effects on the plasma levels of cytokine IL-17, IL- 8 and Leukotriene B4 in such cases. Methods A randomized, single blind controlled trial (RCT) was designed. Sixty hospitalized COPD patients with an acute exacerbation were randomly allocated to the treatment group (20 ml of TanReqing Injection iv gtt q 24 h) or the control group (20 ml of placebo Injection iv gtt q 24 h) based on the Guideline for Dignosis and Management of COPD issued by Chinese Society for Respiratory Disease and the Criteria of Dignosis and Efficacy Measures of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome and Illness enacted by The State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients were received standard therapy. Each group contained 30 patients. The therapeutic course of both groups was 12 days. The criterias of TCM syndrome of retention of phlegm-heat in the lung were: cough with rough breath, accumulation of sticky or yellow thick sputum, cough with difficulty in expectoration, or accompanied by fever, thirst with desire of drink, red tougue with yellow fur, slippery and rapid pulse. Results According to the analysis on the basis of intention -to -treat and per-protocol population, it showed that the markedly effective rates were 70.00% and 72.41% respectively, and effective rates were 96.67% and 96.55% in the treatment group respectively. While in the control group the markedly effectiverates were 46.67% and 48.28% respectively, and effective rates were 86.67% and 89.65% respectively. Significantly lower plasma concentration of IL-17 and IL-8 in the treatment group was noted when compared with control group. There was a statistically significant difference between two groups (Plt;0.05). Conclusions TanReqing Injection shows a definite clinical effectiveness without obvious toxic-adverse effects in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and its mechnical function may related to the level of the excess expression of plasma cytokine IL-17, IL-8 in such cases.
【摘要】 目的 观察利胆清微丸治疗慢性胆囊炎湿热蕴结兼血瘀证患者的疗效及安全性，进一步为临床研究提供依据。 方法 2001年4—7月，采用双盲、双模拟、随机平行对照临床试验，将40例患者随机分为试验组（20例）及对照组（20例）。试验组服用利胆清微丸3.5 g/次，3次/d，同时服用胆宁片模拟剂；对照组服用胆宁片3片/次，3次/d，同时服用利胆清微丸模拟剂。 结果 试验组痊愈1例，显效12例，有效5例，无效2例，显效率65%，有效率90%；对照组痊愈2例，显效10例，有效7例，无效1例，显效率60%，有效率95%，两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。试验过程中未发现明显不良反应。 结论 利胆清微丸对于治疗慢性胆囊炎湿热蕴结兼血瘀证有良好效果，是一种安全有效的药物。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the safety and efficacy of Lidanqing pellet on chronic cholecystitis with damp and hot accumulate knot including blood stasis, and to provide a basis for further clinical trials. Methods A double-blind, double dummy, randomized, and controlled clinic trial was undertaken between April and July 2001. A total of 40 patients were randomly divided into trail group and control group. The trial group was given Lidanqin pellet 3.5 g per time, and three times per day; simultaneously taking Danning tablet simulation agent. The control group was given 3 tablets of Danning tablet per time and three times per day; simultaneously taking taking Lidanqing pellets simulation agent. Results In the trail group, one patient was cured, the therapeutic effect was obvious in 12, basically effective in five and invalid in two (with the rate of obvious effect of 65.00% and rate of basic effect of 90.00%). In the control group, two patients was cured, the therapeutic effect was obvious in 12, basically effective in 10, effective in seven and invalid in one (with the rate of basic effect of 60.00% and the rate of obvious effect of 95.00%). The difference between the two groups was significant (Pgt;0.05). Adverse reaction was not found in the trial group. Conclusion Lidanqing pellet, a safe medication, is effective on chronic cholecystitis with damp and hot accumulate knot including blood stasis.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of Chaihu drop-pill in the treatment of common cold (wind-heat syndrome). MethodsA multi-center, double blind, double dummy, randomized controlled trial was conducted. A total of 479 patients with common cold (wind-heat syndrome) diagnosed between February and August, 2011, were randomly divided into two groups:the trial group (n=359) and the control group (n=120). The trial group received Chaihu drop-pill and Yinchai granule analogue three times a day, while the control group received Yinchai granule and Chaihu drop-pill analogue. The therapeutic courses of both groups were 3 days. Clinical symptoms, syndromes, and adverse effects were observed before and after the treatment. Furthermore, blood, urine and stool test, hepatorenal function test and electrocardiogram were also carried out before and after treatment. ResultsAfter treatment, the healing rates of the trial group and the control group were 32.4%, 20.2% (for full analysis set) and 32.6%, 20.5% (for per protocol set), and the overall response rates were 96.3%, 87.4% (for full analysis set) and 96.5%, 87.2% (for per protocol set). There were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.01). No adverse effects were found in the trial. ConclusionChaihu drop-pill is effective and safe in the treatment of common cold (wind-heat syndrome).
Objective To assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) in China from 1999 to 2004 by CONSORT statement and Jadad scale. Methods We randomly selected 13 journals of TCM including Chinese Journal of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine,ect using stratified sampling from about 100 journals of TCM in mainland China, and all issues of selected journals published from 1999 to 2004 were hand-searched according to the hand-search guideline developed by Cochrane Collaboration. All reviewers were trained in the method of evaluating RCTs . A comprehensive quality assessment of each RCT was completed using methods including the revised consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) checklist and Jadad scale. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results A total of 7422 RCTs were identified, and the percentage of RCTs was significantly increased by 18.6%, 23.9%, 27.5%, 28.8%, 33.0% and 35.6% from 1999 to 2004. The mean Jadad score was 1.03 ± 0.61 in all trials with 1 RCT with 5 points, 14 with 4 points, and 102 with 3 points, from 1999 to 2004, the mean Jadad score was 0.85±0.53 (n=746), 0.82±0.63 (n=941), 0.90±0.61 (n=1 243), 1.03±0.60 (n=1 325), 1.12±0.58 (n=1 533) and 1.20±0.62 (n=1 634) respectively, which was improved continuously but slowly. 39.4% of the items in CONSORT, which was equivalent to 11.82 (standard deviation=5.78) of a total of 30 items, were reported across those trials. Some important methodological components of RCTs such as sample size calculation (1.1%), randomization sequence (7.9%), allocation concealment (0.3%), implementation of the random allocation sequence (0.0%) , analysis of intention to treat (0.0%), were incompletely reported. Conclusion Our study suggests that the quality of reporting has been improved but still in poor status, which would urgently promote the establishment of the CONSORT for TCM.
Objective To assess the quality of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses on Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) published in Chinese journals. Methods We searched CNKI, CMB from January 1995 to December 2006 and The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2006) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on TCM. We extracted details of the interventions used in the treatment and control groups, analyzed the validity of included studies and investigated whether the reports used QUOROM statement or not. Results We identified 111 reports, of which 1 on prevention, 1 on adverse events, 1 on risk factors and premonitory symptoms, 2 on physiochemical parameters, and 106 on effectiveness and safety assessment. In total, 42 types of diseases were involved, and 41 reports were related to cerebrovascular diseases. As for the investigated interventions, 25 studies assessed TCM and 12 assessed acupuncture. Two had no control intervention design control in the group, 15 did not describe the interventions in the control group, 50 used active control (26 for western medicine, 12 for Chinese medicine, 12 for western plus Chinese medicine), 14 used blank control, 17 used baseline control, 4 used sham acupuncture or acupoint injection control etc., 5 used placebo control and 4 used "mutual control". The interventions used in the treatment and control groups varied widely. The number of trials included in the reviews and meta-analyses ranged from 1 to 35, and 24 studies included non-randomized controlled trials. Of the 111 reports, 14 were Cochrane reviews, 16 did not assess the quality of included randomized trials and a further 22 performed only simple and nonstandard quality assessment of the included trials. None of the reviews or meta-analyses used the QUOROM statement to report their results. Conclusions Because of the unique characteristics of TCM, systematic reviews of TCM should focus on a specific topic, avoid the selection of too many drugs, address the target indications of the test drugs and pay attention on intervention evaluation. High quality systematic reviews of TCM are needed but they will only be produced through the concerted efforts of clinicians, TCM practitioners and methodologists.