Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and cost of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) vs. traditional abdominal myomectomy (TAM) in treating Chinese patients with hysteromyoma. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2012), PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data were searched from their inception to September, 2012 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about LM vs. TAM in treating Chinese patients with hysteromyoma, and the references of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data and assessed the methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of 8 RCTs involving 1 000 Chinese patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, LM was superior to TAM in postoperative exhaust time (WMD= ?15.21, 95%CI ?20.19 to ?10.24, Plt;0.000 01) and postoperative hospital stay (WMD= ?3.07, 95%CI ?4.25 to ?1.90, Plt;0.000 01), with significant differences. But it was inferior to TAM in operation time (WMD=28.33, 95%CI 18.07 to 38.59, Plt;0.000 01) and hospital costs (WMD=2 028.87, 95%CI 1 190.75 to 2 866.98, Plt;0.000 01), with a significant difference. There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding amount between the two groups (WMD= ?2.78, 95%CI ?41.56 to 36.00, P=0.89). Conclusion This study shows LM is superior to TAM in fastening postoperative recovery and shortening hospital stay, but it is longer in operation time and higher in cost. The intraoperative bleeding amount is similar in the two groups. Due to low methodological quality and small sample size of the included studies, this conclusion has to be further proved by more high-quality RCTs.
Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for endometrial cancer. Methods The databases such as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Ovid, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP were searched to collect the randomized control trials (RCTs) about the clinical effectiveness and safety of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer. The retrieval time was from January 1998 to September 2012. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 10 RCTs involving 6 993 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that, compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy had lesser amount of intraoperative bleeding, lower decrease of hemoglobin before and 1-day after operation, shorter time of both waiting for postoperative gas and hospital stay, lower incidence of postoperative complications, longer operation time, and higher incidence of intraoperative complications. Additionally, there were no differences between the 2 groups in the number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes removed during operation, as well as the postoperative recurrence and mortality rates in 3-5 year follow-up. Conclusion Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy shows lesser amount of intraoperative bleeding, lower decrease of hemoglobin before and 1-day after operation, shorter time of both waiting for postoperative gas and hospital stay, lower incidence of postoperative complications. But laparotomy shows lower incidences of intraoperative complications, and shorter operation time. Both operations are similar in the number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes removed during operation, as well as the postoperative recurrence and mortality rates in 3-5 year follow-up. For quantity limitation and low methodological quality of included studies, this conclusion still needs to be further proved by performing more high-quality and large scale RCTs.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between conventional open repair (OR) and endovascular repair (EVRAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods Between March 2000 and July 2011, 48 cases of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm were treated by conventional OR in 40 cases (OR group) or by EVRAR in 8 cases (EVRAR group). There was no significant difference in age, sex, the neck length (less than 2 cm), the neck angulation of aneurysm (more than60°), il iac severe tortuosity, preoperative systol ic pressure, and preoperative comorbidity between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The blood transfusion volume, operation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative complications, reinterventions, and mortality were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in 24-hour and 30-day mortality rates and non graft-related complications between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). EVRAR group was significantly better than OR group in blood transfusion volume, operation time, and ICU stay (P lt; 0.05), but OR group was significantly better than EVRAR group in reinterventions and graftrelated complications (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion EVRAR has obvious advantages in blood transfusion volume, operation time, and ICU stay, so it is feasible for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with precise anatomical suitability.
Objective To compare the surgical outcome and investigate the clinic value between laparoscopic operation and laparotomy in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Methods We searched PubMed, EMbase, SCI, The Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Journal Full Text Database, Chinese Medical Association Journals, and references of the included studies up to April 2009. Studies involving treatment outcome of ectopic pregnancy using laparoscopy compared with laparotomy were included. Data were extracted and methodological quality were evaluated by two reviewers independently with designed extraction form. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0.1 software was used for data analyses. Results A total of 11 studies involving 1795 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that laparoscopy comparing with laparotomy; the operation time and complications had no difference; intraoperative blood loss was less than laparotomy; intestinal gas exhaust and evacuation active time was earlier than laparotomy. Conclusion Laparoscopy treating for ectopic pregnancy is better than laparotomy. It is a minimally invasive surgical technique, and is worthy to be popularized.
【摘要】 目的 研究腹腔镜行进展期胃癌根治术较传统开腹手术在围手术期临床和生化指标的变化，进一步探讨其临床应用的优越性。 方法 采用统一入组标准、同期临床对比研究方法，对2010年1-12月腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组完成的112例进展期胃癌根治术患者在围手术期临床指标和生化指标的比较分析，其中腹腔镜手术组59例，开腹手术组53例。 结果 腹腔镜组手术切口长度为（5.77±0.74） cm，开腹手术组为（12.05±1.30） cm，组间差异有统计学意义（t=-30.921，P=0.000）；腹腔镜组术中失血量为（107.20±27.23） mL，开腹手术组为（168.87±96.76） mL，组间差异有统计学意义（t=-4.483，P=0.000）；腹腔镜组术后住院时间为（7.19±0.97） d，开腹手术组为（8.32±1.16） d，组间差异有统计学意义（t=-5.634，P=0.000）；腹腔镜组手术时间为（202.12±15.71） min，开腹手术组为（196.32±16.73） min，组间差异无统计学意义（t=1.891，P=0.061）；腹腔镜组清扫淋巴结枚数（14.15±4.51）枚，开腹手术组（15.25±5.17）枚，组间差异无统计学意义（t=0.736，P=0.471）；腹腔镜组肠功能恢复时间为（57.88±9.70） h，开腹手术组为（59.16±10.82） h，组间差异无统计学意义（t=-0.655，P=0.514）。两组前白蛋白和血红蛋白水平差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。 结论 进展期胃癌行腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术比较，并不加重患者创伤反应，也不增加手术并发症，具有手术切口小、术中出血少、术后恢复快等优点。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the differences between laparoscopy and open surgery for treating advanced gastric cancer in peri-operative clinical and biochemical indexes, in order to investigate the superiority of laparoscopy in treating the disease. Methods The same including standards and double-blind randomized control study were carried out to compare the peri-operative clinical and biochemical indexes of 112 patients who underwent radical treatment for advanced gastric cancer from January to December 2010. Among them, 59 patients were included in the laparoscopic group, and 53 in the traditional open operation group. Results Compared with the open surgery group, the incision length [(5.77±0.74) cm vs. (12.05±1.30) cm; t=-30.921, P=0.000], intraoperational blood loss [(107.20±27.23) mL vs. (168.87±96.76) mL; t=-4.483, P=0.000] and hospital stay time [(7.19±0.97) days vs. (8.32±1.16) days; t=-5.634, P=0.000] were significantly shorter or lower in the laparoscopic group. However, the operation time [(202.12±15.71) minutes vs. (196.32±16.73) minutes; t=1.891, P=0.061], number of lymph nodes removed (14.15±4.51 vs. 15.25±5.17; t=0.736, P=0.471), and intestinal functioning time [(57.88±9.70) hours vs. (59.16±10.82) hours; t=-0.655, P=0.514] were not significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the level of prealbumin and hemoglobin. Conclusion Compared with the traditional open operation, laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer has obvious advantages including smaller incision, lower blood loss during the operation, and fast recovery, without aggravating patients′ traumatic response or increasing the incidence of operational complications.
目的 探讨超声刀（ultrasonic harmonic scalpel，UHS）在消化道恶性肿瘤开腹手术中的应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2009年10月至2011年10月期间广西壮族自治区人民医院普通外科-小儿外科收治并由同一手术者进行消化道恶性肿瘤开腹手术的186例患者的临床资料，根据接受手术的种类（UHS开腹手术或传统电刀开腹手术）将其分为UHS组（86例）和传统电刀组（100例），比较2组患者的手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后3d引流量、术后住院时间以及住院总费用。结果 UHS组手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量以及术后住院时间均短于（少于）传统电刀组（P＜0.05）；术后3d引流量和住院总费用2组间比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 将UHS应用于消化道恶性肿瘤开腹手术可获得较好的效果，能提高手术操作的效率，具有很好的应用前景。
ObjectiveTo summarized the clinical experience on laparoscopic radical surgery in patients with advanced distal gastric cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 26 patients with advanced distant gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsLaparoscopic distal gastrectomy was performed successfully in all patients. The operation time was (283.2±27.6) min (270-450 min) and the blood loss was (178.4±67.4) ml (80-350 ml). The time of gastrointestinal function recovery was (2.8±1.2) d (2-4 d), out of bed activity time was (1.5±0.4) d (1-3 d) and liquid diet feeding was (3.5±1.4) d (3-4 d). The hospital stay was (10.0±2.6) d (7-13 d). The number of harvested lymph nodes was 11 to 34 (17.8±7.3). The distance from proximal surgical margin to tumor was (7.0±2.1) cm (5-12 cm) and the distance from distal surgical margin to tumor was (5.5±1.8) cm (4-8 cm), thus surgical margins were negative in all samples. All patients were followed up for 3-48 months (mean 18.5 months), two patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma died of extensive metastasis in 13 and 18 months, respectively, and other patients survived well. ConclusionsLaparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer is safe and feasible. However, the advantage of laparoscopic technique over the conventional open surgery requires further study.
Objective To analyze the treatment and effect of bacterial liver abscess over the past two decades in one single center. Methods The total 198 patients with bacterial liver abscess during the last twenty years were studied retrospectively. They were divided into three groups according time: 1989-1995 group, 1996-2002 group and 2003-2008 group. Gender and age of patient, location, number and size of abscesses, treatment, hospital days, morbidity of complications and mortality among the groups were compared. Results There were 54, 69, 75 cases in 1989-1995, 1996-2002 and 2003-2008 group respectively. No significant differences were found in gender and age of patient, location, number and size of abscess among three groups （Pgt;0.05）. In 1989-1995 group, 35 cases (64.8%) were treated with laparotomy, 8 cases (14.8%) with laparoscope, and 11 cases (20.4%) with percutaneous treatment (needle aspiration or catheter drainage). In 1996-2002 group, 15 cases (21.8%) were treated with laparotomy, 21 cases (30.4%) with laparoscope, 31 cases (44.9%) with percutaneous treatment (needle aspiration or catheter drainage), and 2 cases (2.9%) were treated with antibiotherapy. In 2003-2008 group, 5 cases (6.7%) were treated with laparotomy, 13 cases (17.3%) with laparoscope, 54 cases (72.0%) with percutaneous treatment (needle aspiration or catheter drainage), and 3 cases (4.0%) were treated with antibiotherapy. The constituent ratio of treatment was significantly different among three groups (P＜0.05). The hospital days was (18.5±12.2) d, (16.4±12.8) d and (20.1±14.6) d, the morbidity of complications was 9.3% (5/54), 4.3%(3/69) and 4.0%(3/75), the mortality was 3.7%(2/54), 1.4%(1/69) and 1.3% (1/75) respectively, but there were no significant differences of three indexes among three groups. Conclusion With the development of surgical techniques, effective antibiotic therapy and percutaneous treatment (needle aspiration or catheter drainage) have been the main therapeutic methods, and laparoscopy and laparotomy are necessary supplement.
ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness between endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) treatment and laparotomy treatment for simple common bile duct stone or common bile duct stone combined with gallbladder benign lesions. MethodsA total of 596 patients with common bile stone received ERCP (ERCP group) and 173 received open choledocholithotomy (surgical group) in our hospital between January 2009 and December 2012. Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The curing rate, postoperative complications, hospital stay, preoperational preparation and total cost were compared between the two groups of patients. Meanwhile, for common bile stone combined with gallbladder benign lesion, 29 patients received ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) (ERCP+LC group), 38 received pure laparoscopy treatment (laparoscopy group) and 129 received open choledocholithotomy combined with cholecystectomy (surgery group). ResultsFor simple common bile stone patients, no significant difference was found in cure rate and post-operative complication between endoscopic and surgical treatment groups (P>0.05). However, total hospitalization expenses[(13.1±6.3) thousand yuan, (20.6±7.5) thousand yuan)], hospital stay[(8.91±4.95), (12.14±5.15) days] and preoperative preparation time[(3.77±3.09), (5.13±3.99) days] were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). For patients with common bile stone combined with gallbladder benign lesion, no significant discrepancy was detected among the three groups in curing rate and post-operative complications (P>0.05). Significant differences were detected between ERCP+LC group and surgical group in terms of total hospitalization expense[(18.9±4.6) thousand yuan, (23.2±8.9) thousand yuan] hospital stay[(9.00±3.74), (12.47±4.50) days] and preoperative preparation time[(3.24±1.83), (5.15±2.98) days]. No significant difference was found in total hospitalization expense and hospital stay, while significant difference was detected in preoperative preparation time between ERCP+LC group and simple LC group. ConclusionFor patients with simple common bile stone, ERCP is equivalent to surgery in the curing rate, and has more advantages such as less cost, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower preoperative preparation time. For the treatment of common bile duct stone with gallbladder benign disease, ERCP combined with LC also has more advantages than traditional surgery.
ObjectiveTo systemically evaluate safety and effectiveness of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and conventional open distal gastrostomy(CODG) with D2 lymph node dissection for Chinese patients with distal gastric cancer. MethodsLiterature were searched in PubMed database, the Cochrane Library, China science citation database (CSCD), Wanfang database, China science and technology journal database (CSTJ), China biomedical literature database (CBM), and China academic journal network publishing database (CAJD) to identify clinical random controlled trials, comparing safety and effectiveness of LADG and CODG with D2 lymph node dissection for Chinese patients with distal gastric cancer. The retrieval time was from the inception to Jun. 2013. Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 7 clinical random controlled trials including 548 patients were analyzed. Compared with CODG group, LADG group had less blood loss (MD=-94.02, 95% CI:-140.96--47.07), shorter postoperative hospital stay(MD=-3.66, 95% CI:-5.76--1.57), earlier postoperative ambulation time(MD=-1.95, 95% CI:-2.74--1.17), earlier postoperative exhaust time (MD=-1.67, 95% CI:-2.05--1.30), lower incidence of complications(OR=0.26, 95% CI:0.14-0.51), P<0.050. But the operation time was longer in LADG group (MD=35.01, 95% CI:10.41-59.61, P=0.005). There was no significant difference between LADG group and CODG group on number of lymph node which were dissected during the operation (MD=-0.24, 95% CI:-0.99-0.51, P=0.530). ConclusionThe short-term outcome and safety of LADG for Chinese patients with distal gastric cancer is superior to CODG, but LADG prolongs the operation time and its long-term outcome should be proved by further outcomes of clinical controlled trials.