ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness of double-bundle versus single-bundle for arthroscopic transtibial reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, VIP and WanFang Data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PCL reconstruction treated with double-bundle versus single-bundle arthroscopic transtibial technique. Two reviewers screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCTs involving 186 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that double-bundle was superior to single-bundle in Lysholm score (MD=2.17, 95%CI 0.29 to 4.05, P=0.02), Tegner score (MD=0.62, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.16, P=0.02), IKDC objective score (A:RR=1.57, 95%CI 1.09 to 2.26, P=0.02; A+B:RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.32, P=0.04). However, there was no significant difference in the KT-1000 posterior between both groups (MD=-0.65, 95%CI -3.29 to 1.99, P=0.63). ConclusionThe current evidence shows that the double bundle arthroscopic transtibial is superior to the single bundle PCL reconstruction. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies with large sample-size are needed to validate the conclusion.
Objective To investigate the cl inical characteristics and methods of diagnosis and treatment of multiple level thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Methods From March 2002 to March 2006, 17 patients with 35 thoracolumbar spinal fractures were treated, 13 males and 4 females, aged 21-52 years old (36.4 on average), among whom there were 10 cases of traffic accident injury and 7 of high fall ing injury. One fracture was located at T2, 1 at T3, 1 at T10, 4 at T11, 6 at T12, 5 at L1, 3 at L2, 7 at L3, 5 at L4, and 2 at L15, with a total of 35 segments including 26 segments with unstable fractures and 9 segments with stable compression fractures. According to the Frankel grade, there was 1 case of grade A, 1 of grade B, 2 of grade C, 5 of grade D and 8 of grade E. The preoperative height of the anterior border of the vertebral body was (20.8 ± 3.8) mm and the preoperative kyphosis angle was (16.2 ± 3.4)°. All the unstable fractures were performed operation. Sixteen injured vertebras were treated with long-segment pedicle screw internal fixation; 8 were treated with short-segment pedicle screw internal fixation, and 2 were treated with anterior fusion and fixation. Five injured vertebras with stable compression fractures were not treated and 4 were treated with pedicle screw implantation. Results The operation time was 1.8-4.2 hours and the amount of blood loss was 300-900 mL. The incisions obtained heal ing by first intention after the operation. All 17 patients were followed up for 13-41 months (18 months on average), and radiological evaluation showed no failure of the internal fixation. After the operation, the Frankel scale assessment showed that 1 patient of grade A improved to grade B, 1 of grade B improved to grade C, 1 of grade C improved to grade D, 1 of grade C improved to grade E, 5 of grade D improved to grade E, and 8 of grade E had no improvement. At the final postoperative follow-up, the height of the anterior border of the vertebral body was (31.9 ± 3.2) mm and the kyphosis angle was (6.8 ± 3.7)°, which were significantly different from those of preoperation (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion The treatment of multiple level thoracolumbar spinal fractures should be individual ized according to the patients’ actual conditions in order to obtain decompression and stabil ity of spines.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of at the fracture level (AFL) versus cross the fracture level (CFL) short-segment pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. MethodsWe electronically search PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2015), EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AFL versus CFL short segment pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures from inception to Aug. 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 730 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that: compared with the CFL group, the AFL group had more blood loss (MD=9.8, 95%CI 7.40 to 12.20), less implant failure rate (RR=0.19, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.48), lower long term postoperative VAS score of thoracolumbar pain (MD=-1.20, 95%CI -1.85 to -0.56), higher correction in short term postoperative kyphotic Cobb angle (MD=3.56, 95%CI 2.25 to 4.87), smaller value in long term postoperative kyphotic Cobb angle and its loss of correction (MD=-3.95, 95%CI -7.78 to -0.12; MD=-4.65, 95%CI -6.91 to -2.40), smaller degree of anterior vertebral height compression in short and long term postoperative (MD=-3.51, 95%CI -5.23 to -1.80; MD=-8.28, 95%CI -12.22 to -4.33), better result in long term postoperative anterior vertebral height and its loss of correction (MD=8.00, 95%CI 3.85 to 12.15; MD=-6.06, 95%CI -7.68 to -4.44). There were no significant differences between two groups regarding operation time, infectious complications and short term postoperative kyphotic Cobb angle (MD=0.11, 95%CI -5.36 to 5.57; RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.11 to 2.85; MD=-0.66, 95%CI -2.19 to 0.87). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that AFL short-segment pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures is superior to CFL fixation. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of autograft versus allograft tendon for posterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2015), EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from inception to August 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials, clinical controlled trials and cohort studies of autograft tendon versus allograft tendon for posterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 7 cohort studies involving 376 patients who had undergone the arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle PCL reconstruction were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that no significant differences were found between the autograft group and the allograft group in Lysholm score (MD=-0.54, 95%CI -2.36 to 1.27, P=0.56), Tegner score (MD=-0.04, 95%CI -0.88 to 0.80, P=0.93), IKDC objective score (OR=1.31, 95%CI 0.68 to 2.53, P=0.41) and posterior translation side-to-side difference (SMD=-0.15, 95%CI -0.37 to 0.07, P=0.18). However, patients in the allograft group had a longer duration of fever when compared with the autograft group patients (MD=-3.55, 95%CI-5.61 to -1.49, P=0.0007). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that autograft tendon and allograft tendon tibial have similar effects in PCL single-bundle reconstruction, though there is a longer duration of fever in patients with allograft. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.