Objective To investigate whether patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma need further surgery after programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with chemotherapy, and its impact on survival. MethodsPatients with ⅡA-ⅢB esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 were selected. According to whether surgery was performed after PD-1 antibody combined chemotherapy, the patients were divided into surgery group and non-surgery group. The general clinical data, side effects, clinical complete response rate (CCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Results Finally 58 patients were included, including 45 males and 13 females. There were no significant differences in general clinical data and adverse reactions between the surgery group and the non-surgery group. Univariate analysis showed that ORR and surgery were significantly associated with PFS (P<0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that surgery was the only independent risk factor for PFS (P=0.003). K - M survival analysis showed that the PFS and OS in surgical group were significantly higher than those in the non-surgery group (HR=0.13, 95%CI 0.036 to 0.52, P＜0.01; HR=0.17, 95%CI 0.045 0.68, P＜0.01). ConclusionAfter PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy, patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma still needs to be treated with surgery, so as to obtain better PFS and OS.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility,safety and short-term clinical outcomes of complete videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for patients with early-stage lung cancer (LC). MethodsClinical data of 138 consecutive patients with early-stage LC who underwent lobectomy in the First People's Hospital of Jining from January 2012 to May 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 71 patients undergoing complete VATS lobectomy including 39 male and 32 female patients with their age of 57.9±10.6 years (VATS group) and 67 patients undergoing lobectomy via traditional thoracotomy including 36 male and 31 female patients with their age of 60.3±8.2 years (thoracotomy group). Operation time,intraoperative blood loss, groups and number of lymph node dissection,thoracic drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay,vision analogue scores (VAS) on the 1st,3rd and 30th postoperative day, and postoperative morbidity were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsAll the patients in both groups success fully received their operation. Intraoperative blood loss (147±113 ml vs. 146±91 ml) number of lymph node dissection (9.9±3.6 vs. 10.0±3.6) group of lymph node dissection (3.1±1.3 vs. 3.4±1.3) and VAS on the 1st and 3rd postoperative day of VATS group were not statistically different from those of the thoracotomy group (P>0.05). Operation time (119±27 minutes vs. 135±29 minutes) thoracic drainage duration (3.0±0.9 days vs. 3.8±1.2 days) postoperative hospital stay (8.0±2.1 days vs. 10.2±5.4 days) VAS on the 30th postoperative day (2.6±0.7 vs. 3.2±1.1) and postoperative morbidity (8.5% vs. 19.4%) of VATS group were significantly shorter or lower than those of the thoracotomy group (P<0.05). Fifty-nine patients in VATS group and 58 patients in the thoracotomy group were followed up for 2-18 months after disc harge. During follow-up,there was no death in either group. There was 1 patient with brain metastasis,1 patient with liver metastasis,and 2 patients with bone metastasis. ConclusionComplete VATS lobectomy is safe and feasible for the treatment of early LC with the advantages of minimal invasiveness,less morbidity,better postoperative recovery and less chronic incision pain. Complete VATS lobectomy can also achieve similar standardization of lymph node dissection as routine thoracotomy.
Surgery is the preferred treatment for resectable esophageal cancer, but in locally advanced esophageal cancer, the effect of surgery alone is not ideal, so surgery-based comprehensive treatment is the best option. Neoadjuvant therapy has become a standard treatment in the treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, etc. With the significant efficacy and acceptable toxicity of immunotherapy in the first-line and second-line treatment of advanced esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has become a research hotspot of locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. This article reviews the latest research progress and some limitations of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced resectable non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Methods The clinical data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and surgery after chemotherapy alone from April 2021 to January 2021 in the first People's Hospital, Jining, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the preoperative neoadjuvant regimen, the patients were divided into a combination group and a chemotherapy group, and the clinical data of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 66 patients were enrolled, including 61 males and 5 females. There were 53 patients in the combination group with an average age of 63.40±6.80 years, and 13 patients in the chemotherapy group with an average age of 58.62±8.30 years. There was statistical difference in age between the two groups (P=0.02), but no statistical difference in other baseline data (P＞0.05). MPR was 54.7% in the combination group and 23.1% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.042), and PCR was 39.6% in the combination group and 0.0% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.006). The combined group had a shorter operative time (P=0.039). There were no statistical differences in intraoperative bleeding, postoperative tube-carrying time, postoperative complications, OS or EFS between the two groups. Conclusion Surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy is safe and feasible, and long-term efficacy should be confirmed by further follow-up.
Objective To observe the short-term efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). MethodsClinical data were collected from patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgical treatment at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Jining First People's Hospital from April 2020 to April 2022. The endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate, safety, and postoperative survival. Results A total of 43 patients with ESCC who received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy before surgery were included. Among them, there were 31 males and 12 females, aged from 46 to 77 years, with a median age of 65 years. All patients successfully completed the surgery without any surgical delays. The pCR rate was 14.0% (6/43), the MPR rate was 58.1% (25/43), and the R0 resection rate was 97.7% (42/43). Patients exhibited reliable safety during neoadjuvant therapy and postoperatively. The 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 90.7% and 81.4%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test revealed lower recurrence rates and better survival in the MPR group compared to the non-MPR group. Conclusion The combination of neoadjuvant sintilimab and chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy, while also being safe and reliable.