ObjectiveTo explore the differential expression of Sirtuin1 (SIRT1) in type A aortic dissection at diverse ages.MethodsThe expression of SIRT1 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in aortic tissue of the patients with type A aortic dissection (an aortic dissection group) and coronary heart disease (a control group) from 2019 to 2020 in the First Hospital of China Medical University was analyzed. In each group, the patients were divided into 3 subgroups according to the age (a younger subgroup, <45 years; a middle age subgroup, 45-60 years; an elderly subgroup, >60 years). The quantitative real-time PCR, Western blotting and immunochemical stainning were used to detect the mRNA or protein expression of SIRT1 and MCP-1. ResultsA total of 60 patients were included in each group, including 79 males and 41 females. There were 20 patients in the yonger, middle age and elderly subgroups for the two groups, respectively. Compared with the control group, the expression of SIRT1 mRNA decreased in the aortic dissection group (the younger subgroup: 4.54±1.52 vs. 8.78±2.57; the middle age group: 2.70±1.50 vs. 5.74±1.07; the elderly group: 1.41±1.33 vs. 3.09±1.14, P<0.001). Meanwhile, SIRT1 mRNA in the aortic dissection group declined with age (P<0.01). Compared with the control group, SIRT1 protein expression decreased significantly in the aortic dissection group (the younger group: 0.64±0.18 vs. 1.18±0.47; the middle age group: 0.43±0.26 vs. 0.69±0.32; the elderly group: 0.31±0.24 vs. 0.45±0.29, P<0.01). The Western blotting results showed that the expression of SIRT1 protein in the aortic dissection group decreased with age (P<0.01). The MCP-1 protein expression of younger and middle age patients in the aortic dissection group was increased compared with that in the control group (the younger group: 0.65±0.27 vs. 0.38±0.22; the middle age group: 1.08±0.30 vs. 0.46±0.36, P<0.001). MCP-1 expression increased with age (P<0.01). The result of immunohistochemical staining for SIRT1 protein was similar to that of Western blotting.ConclusionThe expression of SIRT1 decreases in patients with aortic dissection disease, and declines with age. SIRT1 may play an important role in the treatment and screening of type A aortic dissection.
We have tried to explore the energy loss (EL) within the left ventricle in hypertension by using vector flow mapping (VFM) to detect left ventricular hemodynamic changes in hypertensive patients as early as possible and reflect changes of left ventricular function in hypertension by using EL. Twenty-one hypertensive patients with increased left ventricle mass index (LVMI), 14 hypertensive patients with normal LVMI and 22 control subjects were enrolled in this study. Systolic and diastolic EL derived from VFM within the left ventricle and E/e' by dual Doppler were recorded and analyzed. Compared with those of the controls, diastolic and systolic EL were significantly increased in hypertensive group (P<0.05). In diastole, EL=0.439×SBP (systolic blood pressure)–8.349; in systole, EL=0.385×SBP+0.644×LVMI–10.854. And the EL was positively correlated with E/e', but there was no significant correlation between EL and ejection fraction (EF) in the pooled population. The study shows that the increased EL can help us detect changes of left ventricular hemodynamic in hypertensive patients. It needs further investigation to prove whether EL within the left ventricle could be a new parameter to evaluate diastolic function. SBP and LVMI are the independent predictors for systolic EL, while SBP is the independent predictor for diastolic EL.
We tried to explore the value of contrast echocardiography (CEcho) on evaluating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with the inferior wall hypertrophy. A total of 114 patients with HCM were investigated. All the patients received CEcho and routine echocardiography (Echo), and 45 of them received cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 47 of them received Holter. The frequency and percentage of inferior wall hypertrophy were analyzed in HCM patients, as well as the structure and function. The results showed that: (1) Inferior wall hypertrophy was detected in 55 patients (48%) by Echo, while 68 patients (60%) by CEcho. (2) There was no significant difference between CMR and CEcho in the measurement of inferior wall at end-diastole and end-systole. Thickness of inferior wall by CEcho tended to be higher than CMR. However, the inferior wall thickness measured by Echo was obviously lower than that by CMR (P < 0.05) and CEcho ( P < 0.05). (3) Bland-Altman plot suggested good consistency between CEcho and CMR in measuring inferior wall thickness. 95% CI of mean differences in inferior wall thickness between CEcho and CMR were smaller in HCM patients as compared with that between Echo and CMR. Unary linear regression analysis showed good degree of fitting between CEcho and CMR. (4) Holter showed that HCM patients with inferior wall hypertrophy were likely to have higher incidence of premature ventricular complexes (PVC) ≥ 500/24 h. We demonstrate that CEcho is rather sensitive in detecting inferior wall hypertrophy. Echo may underestimate the inferior wall thickness. The risk of ventricular premature beats may increase in HCM patients with inferior hypertrophy.
ObjectiveTo explore the experience of surgical repair for congenital aortic stenosis (AS) in our center.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 145 children diagnosed with AS, who underwent aortic repair from 2008 to 2019, with or without aortic insufficiency (AI), including 104 males and 41 females with a median age of 2.9 (0.6, 7.8) years. The preoperative and intraoperative data, early and long-term valvular function, long-term survival rate and freedom from reoperation and aortic valve replacment (AVR) were analyzed.ResultsThere were 120 patients receiving commissurotomy, 15 valvuloplasty with extra pericardium patch, and 25 AVR. The mean follow-up time was 0.25-11.20 (4.2±2.8) years. Survival rate at 10 years was 92.3%. Freedom from reoperation and AVR was 63.2% and 60.4% respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that using a patch during surgery (P=0.036) was an independent risk factor for reoperation. A history of preoperative balloon dilation (P=0.029) and significant preoperative AI (P=0.001) contributed to AVR.ConclusionSurgical treatment of congenital aortic valve stenosis in children is a safe and effective method that provides enough time to achieve a more definitive solution. Using a patch during surgery increases reoperation hazard. A history of previous balloon dilation and significant preoperative AI may result in AVR during the follow-up.
Objective To construct a risk prediction score model for serious adverse event (SAE) after cardiac catheterization in patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) and verify its predictive effect. Methods The patients with PH who underwent cardiac catheterization in Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology from January 2018 to January 2022 were retrospectively collected. The patients were randomly divided into a model group and a validation group according to the order of admission. The model group was divided into a SAE group and a non-SAE group according to whether SAE occurred after the catheterization. The data of the two groups were compared, and the risk prediction score model was established according to the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis. The discrimination and calibration of the model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, respectively. Results A total of 758 patients were enrolled, including 240 (31.7%) males and 518 (68.3%) females, with a mean age of 43.1 (18.0-81.0) years. There were 530 patients in the model group (47 patients in the SAE group and 483 patients in the non-SAE group) and 228 patients in the validation group. Univariate analysis showed statistical differences in age, smoking history, valvular disease history, heart failure history, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and other factors between the SAE and non-SAE groups (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age≥50 years, history of heart failure, moderate to severe congenital heart disease, moderate to severe PH, cardiac catheterization and treatment, surgical general anesthesia, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide≥126.65 pg/mL were risk factors for SAE after cardiac catheterization for ACHD-PH patients (P<0.05). The risk prediction score model had a total score of 0-139 points and patients who had a score>50 points were high-risk patients. Model validation results showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.937 (95%CI 0.897-0.976). Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2=3.847, P=0.797. Conclusion Age≥50 years, history of heart failure, moderate to severe congenital heart disease, moderate to severe PH, cardiac catheterization and treatment, general anesthesia for surgery, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide≥126.65 pg/mL were risk factors for SAE after cardiac catheterization for ACHD-PH patients. The risk prediction model based on these factors has a high predictive value and can be applied to the risk assessment of SAE after interventional therapy in ACHD-PH patients to help clinicians perform early intervention.
ObjectiveTo discuss outcomes of arch reintervention for post-repair recoarctation in children.MethodsFrom 2009 to 2019, 48 patients underwent reintervention for post-repair recoarctation in Shanghai Children’s Medical Center. Of the 48 patients, 22 patients had surgical repair, 25 patients had balloon angioplasty (BA), and 1 patient had a stent implantation. The clinical data were analyzed, and the difference in time-to-event distribution between the surgical group and the BA group was determined by a log-rank test.ResultsThe median age at reintervention was 15.0 months (range, 3.0 months-15.1 years). The median weight at reintervention was 9.8 kg (range, 3.0-58.0 kg). The time to reintervention after initial repair was 12.5 months (range, 2.0 months-7.8 years). One patient (2.1%) died in hospital and 1 patient (2.1%) experienced arrhythmia after surgical repair. One late mortality (2.1%) occurred after surgical reintervention. One patient (2.1%) experienced aortic dissection after BA. No patient died after BA. Freedom from residual coarctation or new recurrences was 66.7%, 61.3%, and 56.9%, respectively, at 1, 2, and 5 years after reintervention. Freedom from residual coarctation or new recurrences was 90.0%, 81.8%, and 70.1%, respectively, at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgical repair. Freedom from residual coarctation or new recurrences was 52.0%, 48.0%, and 48.0%, respectively, at 1, 2, and 5 years after BA. Compared with BA, surgery-based reintervention had a lower incidence of residual coarctation or recurrences (χ2=4.400, P=0.036).ConclusionReintervention for recoarctation has favorable early outcomes. Compared with balloon angioplasty, surgical repair has a more lasting effect in relieving the recoarctation.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of LeCompte maneuver on in-hospital mortality and mid-to-long term reintervention after single-stage arterial switch operation in children with side-by-side Taussig-Bing anomaly. Methods Clinical data of patients diagnosed with side-by-side Taussig-Bing anomaly and undergoing single-stage arterial switch operation in Shanghai Children’s Medical Center from 2006 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether LeCompte maneuver was performed: a LeCompte maneuver group and a non LeCompte maneuver group. The clinical data of two groups were compared. ResultsFinally 92 patients were collected. LeCompte maneuver was performed in 32 out of 92 patients with a median age of 65.0 days and an average weight of 4.3 kg, among whom 24 (75.0%) were male. Fifteen (46.9%) patients received concomitant aortic arch repair while 12 (37.5%) patients were associated with coronary artery malformation. LeCompte maneuver was not performed in 60 patients with a median age of 81.0 days and an average weight of 4.8 kg, among whom 45 (75.0%) were male. Twenty-two (36.7%) patients received concomitant aortic arch repair while 35 (58.3%) patients were associated with coronary artery malformation. The average cardiopulmonary bypass duration of the LeCompte maneuver group showed no statistical difference from the non LeCompte maneuver group (179.0±60.0 min vs. 203.0±74.0 min, P=0.093). The in-hospital mortality of the two groups were 6 (18.8%) and 7 (11.7%), respectively, which also showed no statistical difference (P=0.364). The median follow-up period was 4.1 (1.6, 7.5) years for 79 patients with 8 lost to follow-up, and no death was observed. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test showed no statistical difference in overall mid-to-long term reintervention rate (P=0.850) as well as right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary artery reintervention rate (P=0.240) with or without LeCompte maneuver. ConclusionWhether or not to perform LeCompte maneuver shows no statistical impact on in-hospital mortality and mid-to-long term reintervention rate of single-stage arterial switch operation for side-by-side Taussig-Bing anomaly.