ObjectiveTo explore the treatment strategies of different types of pancreatic cancer.MethodsBy reading the relevant literatures on the treatment of pancreatic cancer at home and abroad in recent years, the classification of pancreatic cancer and the progress of treatment measures were summarized.ResultsAccording to preoperative imaging evaluation, pancreatic cancer was divided into resectable pancreatic cancer, borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and pancreatic cancer with distant metastasis. Resection of pancreatic cancer should be radical resection, supplemented with chemotherapy after surgery; patients with resected pancreatic cancer in the junction, if the patient with venous invasion could be resected and reconstructed, it was recommended to undergo surgery and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with unresectable reconstruction and arterial invasion should undergo neoadjuvant therapy, and then re-evaluate the resectability of the tumor to determine whether surgery was feasible. Patients with locally advanced or combined metastatic pancreatic cancer had lost the opportunity for surgery, for this kind of patient, advocated neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or second-line combined targeted therapy.ConclusionsMost patients with pancreatic cancer have progressed to the stage of clinical diagnosis. They are familiar with the treatment of different types of pancreatic cancer and take targeted treatment measures to improve the survival time of patients.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of linezolid versus teicoplanin in patients with MRSA pneumonia. Methods Such databases as CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, Science Direct, PubMed, Ovid, SciFinder, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2013) and EMbase were electronically searched for published articles (randomized controlled trials or non-randomized prospective trials with comparable baseline between groups) at home and abroad on the clinical effectiveness and safety of linezolid versus teicoplanin in patients with MRSA pneumonia from January 2003 to March 2013. Using the Cochrane methods, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software in clinical cure rates, clinical effective rates, microbiologic eradication rates, and adverse reaction incidences. Results Finally, 7 studies were included involving 637 patients. The results of meta-analysis were clinical effective rates (RR=1.17, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.32, P=0.009), clinical cure rates (RR=1.06, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.19, P=0.37), bacterial clearance rates (RR=1.32, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.68, P=0.03), and adverse events rates (RR=1.24, 95%CI 0.78 to 1.97, P=0.37). The results of Begg test and Egger test were not significant (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Current evidence shows that, in treating MRSA pneumonia, linezolid is better than teicoplanin in clinical effective rates and bacterial clearance rates. However, they are alike in clinical cure rates and bacterial clearance rates.
ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnosis and treatment of primary thyroid lymphoma.MethodThrough reading of relevant literatures at home and abroad in recent years, the diagnosis and treatment progress of primary thyroid lymphoma were summarized.ResultsThe pathogenesis of primary thyroid lymphoma was associated with chronic inflammatory stimuli such as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Its preoperative diagnosis mainly relied on ultrasound-guided biopsy. The treatment depended mainly on its pathological type and tumor stage. Surgical resection was mainly used for pathological biopsy and relieving compression symptoms, and radiotherapy and chemotherapy were the main treatments.ConclusionsPrimary thyroid lymphoma is a rare thyroid malignancy. Being familiar with and understands its clinicopathological features have important guiding significance for preoperative diagnosis, clearing pathological type and staging, and selection of reasonable treatment measures.