Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Salviae miltiorrhizae Injection (include Danshen Injection and Fufang Danshen Injection) for chronic cor pulmonale. Design A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Method Randomized trials comparing Salviae miltiorrhizae Injection plus routine treatment versus muting treatment alone were identified by electronic and manual searches. No blinding and language limitations were applied. The Jadad scale assessed the methodological quality of trials. Results Thirty randomized trials (n=2 161) were identified. The methodological quality of all trials included was low. The combined results (RR and 95%CI) of symptom scores was 1.20 (1.15 to 1.26). Because of the significant heterogeneity, many other markers of the blood rheology can not be combined. The reason for heterogeneity should include the differences among cases and studies. Because of lacking enough studies, the conclusions about mortality and oxidants/antioxidants markers were not b. Only a few studies had reported adverse events. Conclusions Based in the review, Salviae miltiorrhizae Injection may have positive effect on symptom scores in patients with chronic cor pulmonale. But for mortality, the markers of blood rheology and oxidants/antioxidants, there is no reliable conclusion. However, the evidence is not b due to the general low methodological quality, the variations among studies and experimental markers themselves, and lacking of more relevant and important markers. Further large trials are needed.
目的 观察噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期（AECOPD）临床疗效与安全性。 方法 选取 2010 年 1 月－2011年12月入院的69例AECOPD 患者随机分为试验组（A组，n=36）和对照组（B组，n=33），A组在B组常规治疗的基础上吸入噻托溴铵。治疗起始及结束分别观察两组肺功能指标、慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试（CAT）评分、血气分析、6分钟步行距离、住院时间及药物不良反应。 结果 两组均显示出一定的临床效果，A组治疗后肺功能指标、CAT评分、血气分析、6分钟步行距离均优于B组，差异均具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。A组住院时间短于B组（P＜0.05），且无严重不良反应。 结论 AECOPD患者在常规治疗同时吸入噻托溴铵，疗效显著且临床安全性较高。
Objective To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism ( VTE) in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD ( AECOPD) . Methods The patients with AECOPD admitted fromJune 2006 to February 2010 in Beijing Tongren Hospital were included for analysis. VTE was investigated in all patients ( whether or not clinically suspected) by a standardized algorithm based on D-dimer testing, 4-limb venous ultrasonography, and the patients with clinically suspected pulmonarythromboembolism ( PTE) received ventilation/perfusion scan and ( or) computed tomography pulmonary angiography ( CTPA) . Results The total number of patients with AECOPD was 282, and the prevalence of VTE was 6% ( 17 /282) . Among the hypoxemia group( n = 84) , there were 16 patients with DVT with a prevalence of VTE of 19. 1% ( 16/84) in which 3 cases developed with PTE. In the non-hypoxemia group ( n =198) , the prevalence of VTE was 0. 5% ( 1/198) , and there was no case with PTE. The incidence of VTE in the hypoxemia group was significantly higher than that in the non-hypoxemia group( P lt; 0. 01) .Logistic analysis showed that lower PaO2 was the risk factor for VTE ( P lt; 0. 01 ) . Conclusions The incidence of VTE in AECOPD was 6% , mainly in the form of lower limb DVT. Hypoxemia was the risk factor for VTE in patients with AECOPD.
Objective To investigate the serum level of surfactant protein D ( SP-D) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD) and its clinical significance. Methods Serumlevels of SP-D in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD ( n = 29) , stable COPD ( n = 26) , and control subjects ( n = 19 ) were measured by ELISA. Multiple regression modeling was performed to determine the independent relationship between SP-D and lung function variables. Results The serum SP-D levels were significantly increased in the patients who experienced an acute exacerbation [ ( 70. 6 ±20. 7) ng/mL] compared with the patients with stable COPD and the control subjects [ ( 47. 9 ±13. 3) ng/mL and ( 31. 2 ±11. 4) ng/mL] ( both P lt; 0. 01) . The serum SP-D levels in the patients with stable COPD increased significantly than the control subjects ( P lt; 0. 01) . Smoking index and staging of COPD were positively related to SP-D level. Serum SP-D levels were also found to be inversely related to FEV1% pred in stable COPD. Conclusion Serum SP-D may be a potential diagnostic and staging biomarker for COPD.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and VIP were electronically searched, and the relevant conference proceedings were also hand-searched. The search time was up to July, 2011. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin for AECOPD were included. Literature was screened according to inclusive and exclusive criteria, data were extracted, quality was assessed, and then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0. Results A total of 6 RCTs involving 482 patients with AECOPD were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that moxifloxacin group was significantly superior to levofloxacin group in the effective rate (OR=3.15, 95%CI 1.80 to 5.49, Plt;0.000 1). The bacterial clearance rate in moxifloxacin group was also higher than that in the levofloxacin group (OR=2.79, 95%CI 1.30 to 5.97, P=0.008). In addition, adverse effects of moxifloxacin group were less than levofloxacin (OR=0.48, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.98, P=0.04). Conclusion Based on current studies, moxifloxacin is superior to levofloxacin in improving effective rate and bacterial clearance rate, and in lowering side effects when treating AECOPD. Hence it is considerable to use moxifloxacin instead of levofloxacin in the treatment of AECOPD if necessary. Due to the limitation of both quantity and quality of included studies, this conclusion should be further confirmed with more high quality and large sample studies.
目的 探讨Ｃ反应蛋白(CRP)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者治疗前、后的变化和临床意义。方法 纳入2008年1月-9月住院治疗的80例AECOPD患者，分别测定应用抗生素治疗前后CRP、白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞百分比(N%)、血沉和体温，并比较这些指标的变化情况。结果 AECOPD患者在感染期CRP总阳性率为100.00%，显著高于治疗前WBC、N%、血沉和体温的阳性率(Plt;0.05)；也显著高于感染控制后(Plt;0.05)。 结论 CRP作为细菌性感染的敏感指标之一，也可作为指导临床及时、正确使用或评价抗生素疗效的一个指标。