目的 探讨手助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的技术路线。方法 笔者所在科室于2011年10月17日完成1例手助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术。术中采用术者双侧站位、左右侧对称戳孔的策略，站立于患者右侧，游离胃网膜左血管和胃左血管，包括清扫No.7、No.8和No.9淋巴结；站立于患者左侧，游离十二指肠环和清扫下腔静脉旁淋巴结。经手助切口直视下完成消化道重建。结果 上腹部正中手术切口长7cm；手术时间为420min；术中出血量约600ml。术后病理报告：送检胃、十二指肠和胰腺标本，十二指肠球部低级别神经内分泌癌，浸润至深肌层，胃及胰腺未受累；两端切缘未见癌细胞，肝十二指肠韧带淋巴结未见癌转移（0/2）；慢性胆囊炎。手术后患者生命体征平稳，术后第5天肛门排气，第7天排便。术后发生腹腔积液并感染，经保守治疗治愈。术后28d出院。结论 术者双侧站位、左右对称戳孔是手助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的新模式，安全、可行、微创，值得进一步探索。
ObjectiveTo analyze short-term outcomes of hand assisted laparoscopic (HAL) D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and summarize clinical experiences. MethodsThe clinical data of 199 patients with gastric cancer undergoing D2 radical distal gastrectomy from December 2010 to December 2013 in this hospital were analyzed. HAL (HAL group, n=92) and traditonal open (TO group, n=107) D2 radical distal gastrectomy were performed. The operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between these two groups. ResultsThere was no residue of cancer cells at the surgical margin in the HAL group and the TO group. Compared with the TO group, the average incision length was obviously shorter (P < 0.01) and the average intraoperative blood loss was obviously less (P < 0.05) in the HAL group. The average operation time, the average number of lymph nodes harvested, and the average postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences between the HAL group and the TO group (P > 0.05). One case was died of unknown gastrointestinal bleeding in the HAL group and the TO group, respectively. The postoperative complication rate was 9.78% (9/92) in the HAL group and 11.21% (12/107) in the TO group, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). ConclusionsHAL D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer don't increase operation time. It has some advantages of minimal invasion and safety as compared with traditional open surgery.
ObjectiveTo explore feasibility and advantages of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for remnant gastric cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 26 patients with remnant gastric cancer who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic (hand-assisted group, n=13) or open (open group, n=13) radical resection from December 2007 to May 2016 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The perioperative outcomes were compared between these two groups. ResultsThere was no conversion to open surgery in the hand-assisted group. Compared with the open group, the incision length was significantly reduced (P=0.000), the intraoperative blood loss was significantly decreased (P=0.038), postoperative the first anal exhaust time was significantly shortened (P=0.025) in the hand-assisted group. The operation time, the number of lymph nodes dissection, and the incidence of postoperative complications had no statistically significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that hand-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for remnant gastric cancer is safe and feasible, it has several advantages including small incisions, mild intraoperative hemorrhage, rapid postoperative recovery, better recent clinical therapeutic outcome and so on as compared with open surgery.
Objective To assess clinical outcomes of hand assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (HALC) and standard laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (SLC). Methods The databases of Wanfang, CNKI, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were electronically searched. The relevant literatures were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Cochrane collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias was used to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess non-randomized comparative studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 9 studies were included and involved 976 patients (480 patients in the HALC group and 496 patients in the SLC group). The results of meta-analysis showed that the HALC group was favor of shorter operative time as compared with the SLC group (P<0.05), but the length of incision and hospital stay were longer in the HALC group (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between these two groups regarding as the conversion rate, time to return of bowel function, feeding time, reoperative rate during hospitalization, postoperative complications rate, and harvested lymph node number (P>0.05). As for the follow-up results, the 3-year survival rate was about 90%, and 5-year survival rate was about 80%, and there were no statistical differences in terms of recurrence rate and mortality between the HALC group and the SLC group (P>0.05). Conclusions Both HALC and SLC could achieve satisfactory minimal invasive outcomes and oncologic radical effects, and HALC has an advantage of shorter operative time, yet length of incision and hospital stay are longer than SLC. Therefore, HALC could be considered as an alternative to minimal invasive right hemicolectomy.