目的 探讨抗核抗体（ANA）在IgA肾病中的阳性率及其对临床的意义。 方法 回顾性分析2007年1月－2009年12月间进行ANA检测的115例IgA肾病患者及59例非IgA肾病慢性肾炎患者的临床资料。统计分析ANA阳性与阴性的临床指标。 结果 IgA肾病患者中有12例（10.4%）存在ANA阳性，与非IgA肾病慢性肾炎中的阳性率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），ANA阳性的IgA肾病血浆IgG水平较高，病理改变较轻。 结论 IgA肾病ANA阳性的机体免疫有增强，肾功、尿蛋白及病理损害较轻，其对IgA肾病预后的影响仍需进一步研究。
ObjectiveTo discuss the relationship between antinuclear antibody (ANA) fluorescence pattern detected by indirect immunity fluorescence (IIF) and antinuclear antibody profiles (including anti-dsDNA, RNP, Sm, SSa, SSb, Scl-70, Jo-1 and rib-P) in human serum. MethodsA total of 7385 cases of ANA pattern and ANA profiles were retrospectively analyzed from January 2010 to December 2013. ANA was detected by IIF substrated as HEp-2 cells, anti-dsDNA by IIF substrated as crithidia, and the other 7 antibodies by enzyme immunoblot with purified antigen. ResultsGranular pattern mostly presented as anti-RNP, anti-Sm, anti-SSa and anti-SSb (P < 0.001); homogeneous pattern was anti-dsDNA and anti-SSa (P < 0.001); nucleolus, centromere, and mixed pattern was anti-SSa (P < 0.05); cytoplasm pattern was anti-rib-P and anti-SSa (P < 0.05). But few above antibodies could be detected in Golgi, dots, rim, actin, actotropomyosin, prolifevating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and vementin pattern. Homogeneous pattern was shown up to 77.91% in only anti-dsDNA positive serum; granular was 96.84%, 52.01%, and 82.35% respectively in only anti-RNP or anti-SSa or anti-Sm positive. Homogeneous and nucleolus mix pattern was up to 30.53% in only anti-Scl-70 positive. Cytoplasm pattern was 50.00% and 61.54% respectively in only anti-rib-P or anti-Jo-1 positive. But no fixed relationship was found between ANA pattern and anti-SSb. ConclusionsThere is a certain relationship between ANA and antinuclear antibody profiles. Granular, homogeneous and cytoplasm pattern often can be detected more than one autoantibodies. Eight kinds of specific autoantibodies often are negative when ANA patterns are centromere, Golgi, dots, rim, actin, tropomyosin, PCNA, and vimentin. Anti-dsDNA is mainly corresponding to homogeneous, anti-RNP, anti-SSa and anti-Sm to granular, anti-Scl-70 to homogeneous and nucleoli, anti-rib-P and anti-Jo-1 to cytoplasm. The study can give suggestions for further tests application and lab result checking.
ObjectiveTo verify the consistency between artificial interpretation and automatic interpretation by HELIOS automatic immunofluorescence system by comparing their results on the same antinuclear antibodies (ANA) fluorescent slides, and analyze the application of automatic interpretation clinically. MethodA total of 281 ANA fluorescent slides of 281 impatients or outpatients in February 2015 were analyzed by HELIOS automatic immunofluorescence system and artificial interpretation respectively. As HELIOS could only determine the titer not the fluorescence type, only the negative or positive results qualitatively and the titer of ANA positive slides were analyzed. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between HELIOS automatic immunofluorescence system and artificial interpretation in negative or positive rate qualitatively (P>0.05) . The total coincidence rate was 98.9%, the positive coincidence rate was 99.5%, and the negative coincidence rate was 97.4%, and the kappa coefficient was 0.973. The difference of titer between the two groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05) . ConclusionsThe results of HELIOS automatic Immunofluorescence system and artificial interpretation are in good consistency. HELIOS automatic immunofluorescence system is suitable for clinical use as its high degree of automation, simple operation and result reliability.