Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety interferon-α (IFN-α) combined with lamivudine vs. IFN-α alone in treating children with Hepatitis B. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on IFN-α combined with lamivudine in treating children with hepatitis B. Two reviewers screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results 8 RCTs were included, with comparable baseline. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared to the IFN-α alone group, the combined therapy group had higher negative rates of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg. There was no significant difference in the positive rate of anti-Hbe and the incidence of adverse reaction between the two groups. Conclusion Current evidence shows that IFN-α combined with lamivudine was more effective than IFN-α alone in treating children’s hepatitis B.
Objective To assess the efficacy of telbivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of telbivudine therapy vs. lamivudine therapy in both Chinese and English were retrieved from seven electronic databases with a cut-off date in February 2010, including PubMed, EMbase, VIP, CBM, CNKI, and The Cochrane library. The meta-analyses and evaluation on methodology quality were performed for the included studies. Results Two RCTs as Grade-A study were included. The meta-analyses showed that telbivudine was superior to lamivudine in aspects of therapeutic response (RR=1.28, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.48, P=0.001), ALT normalization (RR=1.12, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.23, P=0.02), and PCR-negative HBV DNA or below the lower limit (RR=1.44, 95%CI 1.36 to 1.53, Plt;0.000 01), primary treatment failure (OR=0.28, 95%CI 0.18, to 0.43, Plt;0.000 01), viral breakthrough (OR=0.38, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.47, Plt;0.000 01) and viral resistance (OR=0.44, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.55, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion Based on the current clinical evidence, telbivudine demonstrates superiority in comparison with lamivudine on all direct measures of antiviral efficacy for CHB. Because of the short follow-up duration and the small sample size of the included studies, it is expected to further discuss the long-term efficacy.
Objective To assess the efficacy of lamivudine in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B.Methods MEDLINE, SCI, Current Content Connect, The Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Database were searched from the beginning to September 2005, and the references of eligible studies were manually screened. R.andomized controlled trials comparing lamivudine with non-antiviral interventions （ placebo, no treatment and standard care ） in patients with chronic hepatitis B were eligible for inclusion. Two investigators independently assessed the quality and extracted the data. Heterogeneity was examined by Chi-square test. Fixed and random effect meta-analysis were used to pool the data. Subgroup analyses were used in treatment course. Results Eleven R.CTs were included （ n = 1 237 ）. All reported the effect of lamivudine （100 mg/d） , and one of them included lamivudine （25 mg/d）. The treatment duration of 52 weeks and less than 26 weeks were reported in eight and three RCTs, respectively. Six RCTs adequately applied randomization, while other five RCTs were not reported in detail. Four RCTs adequately enforced allocation concealment, five RCTs enforced blinding bitterly. The others were not reported in detail. It was found by meta-analysis that, compared with the control, lamivudine （100 mg/d, 52 W） could significantly clear HBeAg [42.6% vs. 13% , RR 3.20, 95% CI （2.33, 4. 38）] and clearHBVDNA [71.78% vs. 20, 36%, RR3.42, 95%CI （2.80,4.19）], normalize ALT [65% vs. 34.9%, RR1.91, 95%CI （1.64,2.21）], achieve HBeAgseroconversion [16.1% vs. 7.29% , RR2.12, 95%CI （1.24,3.80） ] and histology response [57. 9% vs. 26.2%, RR 2. 17, 95% CI （ 1.67,2.81 ） ] ; Lanfivudine （100 mg/ d, 12 W） could effectively clear HBV DNA [ 50.7% vs 3.92% , RR 8.68, 95% CI （1.72,43.74 ） ] , but was not effective in loss of HBeAg, HBeAg seroconversion and normalization of ALT, Lamivudine （25 mg/d） could effectively clear HBV DNA [97.7% vs. 22.2% , RR 4.41, 95% CI （2.86,6.79） ] and improve histology response [59.3% vs. 30% , RR1.98, 95% CI （1.31,2.99 ） ], but was not effective in HBeAg seroconversion. Conclusions Lamivudine （100 mg/ d） is effective in clearing HBV DNA and HBeAg, normalizing ALT and achieving HBeAg seroconversion.
Objective To investigate the prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation on HBV-related diseases． Methods Published papers were collected and reviewed． Results HBV-related diseases were the main indications of liver transplantation．The prevention for HBV reinfection affects the survivals remarkably. Nowadays, a lot of medication have been used in the prevention of HBV reinfection， and the therapeutic regimens were different from each other. Conclusion Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for HBV-related disease． Appropriate prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation is important for the survivals of patients．
【Abstract】Objective To investigate the prevention and treatment for recurrence of hepatitis B after liver transplantation on HBV-related diseases. Methods Making a literature summarization based on published papers review.Results Acute and chronic HBV-related diseases are the main indications of liver transplantation.Recurrence rate of hepatitis B is from 80% to 100% in the untreated patients after liver transplantation,and it affects the survivals of patients seriously.It has become a focus to prevent and treat the recurrence of hepatitis B.After a series of explotation and application,there have been a lot of drugs of preventing and treating HBV reinfection, including hepatitis B immunoglobulin,interferon and nucleotide analog antivirus drugs(lamivudine, famcyclovir, adefovir),etc.The therapeutic characteristics of them are different. Their utilizations of dividing or alliance are developing rapidly.Conclusion Liver transplatation is an effective therapy for HBV-related disease. Anti-HBV treatments perioperation play an important role in the improvement of succeed of liver transplantation.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of combination therapy with lamivudine (LAM) and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) versus LAM monotherapy in prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation. Methods Databases including MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CBM, VIP, and CNKI were searched up to Dec. 2008. Clinical trials including randomized controlled, non-randomized concurrent-control and case-control studies about combination therapy with HBIG and LAM versus LAM monotherapy in prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation were screened. Trial selection and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.18 software. Results Eleven non-randomized concurrent-control studies involving 1 421 patients (1 035 patients in combination therapy group, and 386 patients in LAM monotherapy group) were included. The results of meta-analyses showed: Compared with LAM monotherapy group, the risks of hepatitis B virus recurrence, YMDD mutation, and death associated with HBV recurrence were significantly reduced by 73% (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.37, Plt;0.000 01), 72% (RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.53, P=0.000 01), and 79% (RR=0.21, 95%CI 0.09 to 0.49, P=0.000 3) respectively in combination therapy group after liver transplantation; overall survival rates of both recipients and grafts in combination therapy group were similar to LAM monotherapy group (RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.95 to 1.11, P=0.51; RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.12, P=0.26). Conclusion Current evidence indicates that compared with LAM monotherapy, combination therapy with LAM and HBIG could reduce the risks of hepatitis B virus recurrence, YMDD mutation, and death associated with HBV recurrence after liver transplantation.
Objective To compare lamivudine monotherapy versus lamivudine-thymosin alpha-1 combination therapy for HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B. Methods We searched CENTRAL (Issue 4, 2008), PubMed (up to December 2008), the Chinese Biomedical database (CBM, up to December 2008), and CNKI (up to December 2008). We also scanned references of all included studies and pertinent reviews. Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.0. Results We identified 23 trials involving 1 488 patients. According to the results of meta-analyses, the HBeAg seroconversion rate of the combination therapy group was higher than that of the monotherapy group, both at the end of the treatment and the one year follow-up (RR=2.89, 95%CI 2.40 to 3.48; RR=4.99, 95%CI 2.99 to 8.31); and there were also significant differences between the two groups for secondary outcomes including HBV-DNA negative, ALT normalization, etc.. There was no significant difference between the two groups in adverse reaction. Conclusion Lamivudine-thymosin alpha-1 combination therapy might be more effective than lamivudine monotherapy for HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the low quality of the included studies. High-quality, large scale randomized controlled trials are needed to further prove the results.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy of zidovudine and lamivudine (ZDV+3TC) for preventing mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted using the methodology of The Cochrane Collaboration. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, AIDSearch, AIDSLINE, AIDSTRIALS, The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2007), AIDSDRUGS, AIDSinfo, CRD (Center of Review and Dissemination) databases and three Chinese Databases (CBM, CNKI, VIP) were searched from their establishment to 31 May 2007. We also searched documents of governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the proceedings of relevant conferences, including the International AIDS Conferences, and the annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. RCTs assessing the effects of ZDV+3TC for preventing MTCT were included. Trial selection, quality assessment and data extraction were done by two reviewers independently. Different opinions were resolved by discussion with a third party. Meta-analyses were conducted using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.9 software. Results Three studies in breastfeeding populations were included. One trial (PETRA, 1797 participants) found that ZDV+3TC decreased the risk of transmission by 35%-65% within 15 months compared with placebo. However, there was no evidence that ultra-short course ZDV+3TC (during labor) decreased the risk of transmission, compared with placebo. The safety of different courses of ZDV+3TC and placebo were similar (Pgt;0.05). Another trial (SAINT, 1317 participants) found that short course ZDV+3TC (from 36weeks gestation to labor) did not significantly reduce HIV infection among children at 8 weeks after delivery, when compared with single dose nevirapine given to the mother and the infant (Pgt;0.05). No significant difference was found in the maternal and infants mortality and side effects of two groups. One small trial (Moodley1998, 20 participants) found no infant infection in both ZDV+3TC and 3TC alone within 2 weeks after birth. Conclusions Long course (from 36 weeks gestation to 1 week after delivery) and short course (from 36 weeks gestation to labor) ZDV+3TC were more effective than placebo in preventing MTCT of HIV in breastfeeding women with a similar safety profile. Short course ZDV + 3TC had similar effects to single dose nevirapine, and long course ZDV + 3TC had similar effects to lamivudine alone.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiviral drugs for hepatitis B with YMDD motif variant. Methods We electronically searched MEDLINE (1989-April, 2004), EMBASE (1989-April, 2004), CBMdisc (expand) (1989-April, 2004), and handsearched unpublished Chinese conference proceedings. Randomized and quasi-randomized trials in patients with chronic hepatitis B with YMDD motif variant correlative to lamivudine were collected. Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the quality of literature independently. The data were then analyzed by RevMan 4.2 software. Results Five studies involving 6 trials and 284 patients were included. According to the results of meta-analysis, antiviral therapy with adefovir plus lamivudine showed significantly better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg and normalization of ALT than that of lamivudine alone (RR 16.61, 95%CI 2.29 to 120.71; RR 6.66, 95%CI 1.23 to 35.88 and RR 6.26, 95%CI 2.29 to 17.12 respectively); also, oxymatrine plus thymothin showed obviously better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg (RR 2.96, 95%CI 1.26 to 6.93 and RR 2.51, 95%CI 1.05 to 5.98 respectively).But adefovir alone showed no better effects on clearance of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg than that of lamivudine alone (RR 11.00, 95%CI 0.65 to 186.02 and RR 7.00, 95%CI 0.39 to 126.92 respectively); interferon plus lamivudine showed no better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA, HBeAg and the normalization of ALT (RR 3.50, 95%CI 0.90 to 13.58; RR 4.90, 95%CI 0.70 to 35.10 and RR 2.80, 95%CI 0.91 to 8.12 respectively). Chinese herbs plus lamivudine showed no better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA (RR 1.16, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.51). There were no significant side effects in the groups, except flu like symptom in the interferon group, slight kidney impairment in the adefovir group, and aggravation of rare cases in lamivudine group. Conclusions Antiviral therapy with adefovir plus lamivudine, or oxymatrine plus thymothin, shows better effects than with lamivudine alone in terms of antiviral therapy and clinical outcome improvement. However, the evidence is too weak to draw a definite conclusion in this systematic review. Larger sample size and rigorously designed randomized, double blind, placebo control trials are required for future study.