目的 探讨人工髋关节置换术后Vancouver B1型股骨假体周围骨折的治疗方法。 方法 2006年4月－2011年2月采用记忆合金抓握式接骨板固定结合自体髂骨植骨治疗6例Vancouver B1型股骨假体周围骨折。其中男2例，女4例；年龄55～78岁，平均68.5岁。6例均为初次行人工关节置换术后6个月～3年，平均18.4个月发生假体周围骨折；骨折至手术时间为3～6 d，平均4.2 d。 结果 术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合，无深静脉血栓形成、肺部感染、肺栓塞等并发症发生。6例均获随访，随访时间13个月～4年，平均28.6个月。X线片示骨折全部愈合，愈合时间12～20周，平均14.8周。末次随访时Harris评分76～93分，平均83.6分；获优3例，良3例。无1例出现接骨板折断、松动，骨折再移位、骨不连、股骨假体松动等并发症。 结论 记忆合金抓握式接骨板结合自体髂骨植骨治疗Vancouver B1型股骨假体周围骨折具有固定可靠、操作简便的特点，可获满意临床疗效。
Objective To evaluate clinical efficacy of four-claw Ti-planes for internal fixation of multiple rib fractures and flail chest. Methods Clinical data of 93 patients with multiple rib fractures and flail chest who were admittedto Shanghai Pudong Hospital from December 2011 to November 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 78 male and 15 female patients with their age of 20-80 years. All the patients received internal fixation of rib fractures using four-clawTi-planes. Finite element modeling and analysis were performed to investigate biomechanical behaviors of rib fractures after internal fixation with four-claw Ti-planes. Results The average number of rib fractures of the 93 patients was 5.9±2.1，and each patient received 3.8±1.3 four-claw Ti-planes for internal fixation. The operations were performed 6.3±3.2 days after admission. After the rib fractures were fixed with four-claw Ti-planes，rib dislocations and chest-wall collapse of flail chest were restored，and patients’ pain was relieved. Postoperative CT image reconstruction of the chest showed no dislocationor displacement at the fixation areas of the four-claw Ti-planes. Rib fractures were stabilized well，and normal contours of the chest were restored. Finite element analysis showed that the maximum bearable stress of the rib fractures after internal fixation with four-claw Ti-planes was twice as large as normal ribs. Conclusion Clinical outcomes of four-claw Ti-planesfor internal fixation of rib fractures are satisfactory with small incisions and less muscle injury of the chest wall，so this technique deserves wide clinical use.
Objective To compare the clinical results of locking compress plate (LCP) as an external fixator and standard external fixator for treatment of tibial open fractures. Methods Between May 2009 and June 2012, 59 patients with tibial open fractures were treated with LCP as an external fixator in 36 patients (group A), and with standard external fixator in 23 patients (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, affected side, type of fracture, location, and interval between injury and surgery between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The time of fracture healing and incision healing, the time of partial weight-bearing, the range of motion (ROM) of knee and ankle, and complications were compared between 2 groups. Results The incidence of pin-track infection in group A (0) was significantly lower than that in group B (21.7%) (P=0.007). No significant difference was found in the incidence of superficial infection and deep infection of incision, and the time of incision healing between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 5 cases of group A and 2 cases of group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.036, P=0.085). All patients were followed up 15.2 months on average (range, 9-28 months) in group A, and 18.6 months on average (range, 9-47 months) in group B. The malunion rate and nonunion rate showed no significant difference between groups A and B (0 vs. 13.0% and 0 vs. 8.7%, P gt; 0.05); the delayed union rate of group A (2.8%) was significantly lower than that of group B (21.7%) (χ2=5.573, P=0.018). Group A had shorter time of fracture healing, quicker partial weight-bearing, greater ROM of the knee and ankle than group B (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The LCP external fixator can obtain reliable fixation in treating tibial open fracture, and has good patients’ compliance, so it is helpful to do functional exercise, improve fracture healing and function recovery, and reduce the complication incidence.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for treatment of extra-articular distal tibial fracture. Methods Between March 2009 and March 2012, 57 patients with extra-articular distal tibial fractures were treated, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of 57 cases, 31 were treated with MIPO (MIPO group), and 26 with ORIF (ORIF group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, type of fractures, complication, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications were compared between 2 groups. Results There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Wound infection occurred in 5 cases [2 in MIPO group (6.5%) and 3 in ORIF group (11.5%)], showing no significant difference (χ2=0.651, P=0.499). The other wound obtained healing by first intention. All cases were followed up 13-24 months (mean, 15 months). No significant difference was found in the average healing time between 2 groups and between patients with types A and B by AO classification (P gt; 0.05); in patients with type C, the healing time in MIPO group was significantly shorter than that in ORIF group (t= — 2.277, P=0.033). Delayed union was observed in 3 cases of MIPO group (9.7%) and in 4 cases of ORIF group (15.4%), showing no significant difference (χ2=0.428, P=0.691). Mal-union occurred in 4 cases of MIPO group (12.9%) and in 1 case of ORIF group (3.8%), showing no significant difference (χ2=1.449, P=0.362). No significant difference was found in Mazur score between 2 groups (t=0.480, P=0.633). The excellent and good rate was 93.5% in MIPO group (excellent in 24 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case) and was 92.3% in ORIF group (excellent in 18 cases, good in 6 cases, and poor in 2 cases), and the difference was not significant (Z= — 0.687, P=0.492). Conclusion Both MIPO and ORIF have good results in treating extra-articular distal tibial fractures. MIPO is superior to ORIF for treating complex and communited fractures.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of bridging fixation with long locking plate for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Methods Between October 2010 and December 2011, 18 patients with displaced midshaft clavicular fracture were treated with reduction and bridging fixation with 9 or 10 holes locking plate. There were 17 males and 1 female with an average age of 47 years (range, 23-82 years). Fracture was caused by traffic accident in 6 cases, by falling in 10 cases, by crushing in 1 case, and by crashing object in 1 case. All fractures were closed and displaced or shortened (range, 2.1-3.4 cm; mean, 2.62 cm) with angulation deformity. According to Robinson classification criteria, 5 cases were rated as type 2B1 and 13 as type 2B2. The duration from injury to surgery was 5 hours to 19 days (mean, 5 days). The fracture healing time and complication were recorded; the effectiveness evaluation was performed with Constant-Murley score and satisfaction to appearance. Results No neurologic or vascular complication occurred with primary healing of incision. All patients were followed up 12-22 months (mean, 14.7 months). The fracture healing time was 9-14 weeks (mean, 11.4 weeks). During follow-up, no loosening or breakage of internal fixator was observed. The Constant-Murley score was 82-98 (mean, 92.4) at last follow-up; the satisfaction rate of appearance was 88.9% (16/18). Conclusion Bridging fixation with long locking plate is an effective method for treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Preserved blood supply and stable angle are important to fracture healing.
Objective To analyse the procedure and effectiveness of internal fixation in treatment of displaced radial head fractures. Methods Between August 2005 and May 2009, 35 patients with displaced radial head fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with SmartNail® and/or AO mini-plates. There were 28 males and 7 females with an average age of 28.4 years (range, 17-48 years). The injury mechanism included traffic accident in 16 patients, falling in 13, and falling from height in 6. According to Mason classification, 21 fractures were rated as type II, 9 as type III, and 5 as type IV. All fracturs were closed fractures. Six cases complicated by radial neck fractures, 1 case by olecranon fracture, 3 by posterior dislocations of the elbow, 1 by posterior dislocation of the elbow and coronoid process fracture, and 3 by medial collateral ligament injuries. The time from injury to operation was 3 to 7 days. Results Except 1 patient whose incision healed by second intention, healing of incision by first intention was achieved in the other patients. All patients were followed up 12-25 months with an average of 17 months. The average fracture healing time was 10.2 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks). At last follow-up, the average flexion and extension of the elbow was 119° (range, 95-145°). The average arc of forearm rotation was 126° (range, 90-175°). According to elbow functional evaluation criteria by Broberg and Morrey, the results were excellent in 18 cases, good in 13, and fair in 4; the excellent and good rate was 88.6%. Conclusion In treatment of displaced radial head fractures, open reduction and internal fixation can be performed with SmartNail® and/or AO mini-plates based on different fracture types and the short-term effectiveness is satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the detailed biomechanics of TiNi shape-memory sawtooth-arm embracing plate (TiNi SMA) by comparing with l imited-contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) and static interlocking intramedullary nail (SIiN), so as to provide theoretical evidence for cl inical appl ication. Methods Eight paired cadaveric femurs immersed in formaldehyde were harvested from eight specimens of adults. After making X-ray films and modeling midpiece transverse fracture, one side randomly was fixed by TiNi SMA (group A) and SIiN (group C) orderly, the other side was fixed by LC-DCP (group B). The axial compression, three-point bending (pressed from plate side and opposite side both of group A and group B, from inside of group C), and torsion were tested, and the stress shielding rate was compared. Results At every classified axial compression load, the strains of group A were greater than those of group B and group C (P lt; 0.05), the displacements of group A were greater than those of group B and group C (P lt; 0.05) except 100 N. At every classified three-point bending moment, the displacement of group A were greater than those of group B and group C pressed both from two sides, but there was no difference when pressing from two sides under the same load of group A (P gt; 0.05). At every torsion moment, the torsion angels of group A were greater than those of group B (P lt; 0.05), but equal to those of group C (P gt; 0.05). At 600 N of axial compression load, the stress shielding rates of groups A, B, C were 48.30% ± 22.99%, 89.21% ± 8.97%, 95.00% ± 3.15%, respectively, group A was significantly less than group B and group C (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion The anti-bending abil ity of TiNi SMA is weaker than LC-DCP and SIiN; the anti-torsion abil ity of TiNi SMA is weaker than SIiN, but TiNi SMA is a center-type internal fixation, the superior stress shielding rate and micromovement promote the stress stimulation of fracture, which makes it an ideal internal fixation device.