目的 探讨在丙泊酚诱导麻醉的改良电休克治疗中脑双频谱指数(BIS)与动作发作时间的关系，以及其他因素对电休克动作发作时间的影响。 方法 2012年4月－5月，记录28名患者的107次治疗中的不同时刻脑双频谱指数（BIS）值诱导前、睫毛反射消失时、治疗前即刻、动作发作结束即刻、动作发作结束后60 s）、麻醉药物剂量、动作发作时间及治疗不良反应，并根据动作发作时间将治疗分为A组（治疗无效组，动作发作时间＜17 s）和B组（治疗有效组，动作发作时间≥17 s）。探讨不同时刻BIS值与癫痫发作时间的关系并比较A、B组之间BIS值、麻醉药物剂量差异。 结果 两组间睫毛反射消失时及治疗前即刻BIS值差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。动作发作时间与治疗前即刻BIS值呈正相关（r=0.245，P=0.012），与治疗次数呈负相关（r=−0.283，P=0.004）。 结论 治疗前即刻BIS值与动作发作时间呈正相关，因此，此时的BIS值也许可以作为预测动作发作时间长短的指标。
目的 探讨改良电休克治疗（MECT）中影响脑电抽搐时间的因素。 方法 回顾性分析2011年10月－2011年12月经MECT的111例精神障碍患者的临床资料，利用Pearson相关分析方法进行统计，分析异丙酚用量、性别、设定电量、动态阻抗等因素对脑电抽搐时间的影响。 结果 男性异丙酚用量平均值大于女性。女性的年龄、能量设定百分比、静态阻抗、动态阻抗均大于男性。与抽搐发作时间相关的因素是年龄、设定能量百分比。异丙酚剂量与脑电抽搐时间无相关。以脑电抽搐时间≥25 s为判定标准，男性的反应率高于女性。 结论 行MECT时，需考虑患者年龄对发作时间的影响，异丙酚可安全用于MECT中。
Modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST) are effective treatments for severe major depression. MECT has better efficacy in the treatment than MST, but it has cognitive and memorial side effects while MST does not. To study the causes of these different outcomes, this study contrasted the electric filed strength and spatial distribution induced by MECT and MST in a realistic human head model. Electric field strength induced by MECT and MST are simulated by the finite element method, which was based on a realistic human head model obtained by magnetic resonance imaging. The electrode configuration of MECT is standard bifrontal stimulation configuration, and the coil configuration of MST is circular. Maps of the ratio of the electric field strength to neural activation threshold are obtained to evaluate the stimulation strength and stimulation focality in brain regions. The stimulation strength induced by MECT is stronger than MST, and the activated region is wider. MECT stimulation strength in gray matter is 17.817 times of that by MST, and MECT stimulation strength in white matter is 23.312 times of that by MST. As well, MECT stimulation strength in hippocampi is 35.162 times of that by MST. More than 99.999% of the brain volume is stimulated at suprathreshold by MECT. However, MST activated only 0.700% of the brain volume. The stimulation strength induced by MECT is stronger than MST, and the activated region is wider may be the reason that MECT has better effectiveness. Nevertheless, the stronger stimulation strength in hippocampi induced by MECT may be the reason that MECT is more likely to give rise to side effects. Based on the results of this study, it is expected that a more accurate clinical quantitative treatment scheme should be studied in the future.