Objective To determine the efficacy and prognosis of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Trials were located through electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Springer, and Foreign Journals Integration System (from the start date to March 2008). We also checked the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Statistical analysis was performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2.10. Results A total of 19 trials involving 1 236 patients were included. Results showed that: (1) NPPV vs. conventional therapy: NPPV was superior to conventional therapy in terms of intubation rate (RR 0.36, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.49), failure rate (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.90), and mortality (RR 0.49, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.69). The length of hospital stay was shorter in the NPPV group compared with the conventional group (WMD – 3.83, 95%CI – 5.78 to – 1.89), but the length of ICU stay was similar. The changes of PaO2, PaCO2, and pH were much more obvious in the NPPV group compared with the conventional group. The change of respiratory rate was more significant in the NPPV group compared with the conventional group (WMD – 3.75, 95%CI – 5.48 to – 2.03). At discharge and follow-up, there were no significant differences in FEV1, pH, PaCO2, PaO2, and vital capacity between the two groups. (2) NPPV vs. invasive ventilation: the mortality was similar between the two groups. The incidence of complications was lower in the NPPV group compared with the invasive group (RR 0.38, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.73). The length of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and weaning time were shorter in the NPPV group than those of the invasive group. At discharge and follow-up, clinical conditions were similar between the two groups. Conclusion The limited current evidence showed that NPPV was superior to conventional therapy in improving intubation rate, mortality, short term of blood-gas change, the change of respiratory rate; and superior to invasive ventilation in the length of hospital stay and the incidence of complication. There were no difference among them in discharge and follow-up.
Objective To study the effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with hypercapnic coma secondary to respiratory failure.Methods COPD patients with or without coma secondary to respiratory failure were both treated by bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation on base of routine therapy.There were 32 cases in coma group and 42 cases in non-coma group.Such parameters as arterial blood gas (ABG)，Glasgow coma scale (GCS)，time of NPPV therapy，achievement ratio，and adverse effects were investigated.Results 30 patients in the coma group were improved after NPPV treatment (26 cases recovered consciousness treated by BiPAP in 2 hours，3 cases recovered between 3~8 hours，1 case recovered after 24 hours).The parameters of ABG，the tidal volume and the minute ventilation volume were improved after BiPAP.The time of effective therapy was (9±4) days in the coma group and (7±3) days in the non-coma group with no significant difference (Pgt;0.05).The achievement ratio was similar in two groups (93.75% vs 97.62%，Pgt;0.05).But the incidence of gastrointestinal tympanites reached to a higher level in the coma group (80.5%) than the non-coma group (10.6%).Conclusion COPD patients with hypercapnic coma secondary to respiratory failure isn’t the absolute contraindication of NPPV treatment.
Objective To explore the effects of different humidification and heating strategies during non-invasive positive pressure ventilation( NIPPV) in patients with ALI/ARDS. Methods A total of 45 patients with ALI/ARDS were randomly divided into three groups to receive NIPPV with different humidification and heating strategies, ie. Group A ( humidification with a 370 Humidifier without heating) ,group B ( humidification with a 370 Humidifier along with a MR410 Heater) , and group C ( humidification and heating with aMR850 Humidifier, and a RT308 circuit heater) . The changes of air temperature, absolute humidity, relative humidity, sputum thickness and patient comfort were compared between the three groups. Sputum thickness was evaluated with AWSS scoring system. Results After humidification and heating, the air temperature, absolute humidity and AWSS score improved significantly in group B [ elevated from ( 23. 9 ±1. 0) ℃, (9.8 ±1. 3) mg/L and 2. 0 ±0. 7 respectively to ( 30. 3 ±1. 7) ℃, ( 31. 0 ±2. 3)mg/L and ( 3. 0 ±0. 9) respectively, P lt; 0. 001] and group C [ elevated from( 23. 8 ±1. 0) , ( 9. 8 ±1. 5)mg/L and ( 2. 1 ±0. 7) respectively to ( 34. 0 ±1. 1) ℃, ( 43.8 ±2. 5) mg /L and 3. 5 ±1. 0 respectively,P lt; 0. 001] . Air temperature and absolute humidity were significantly higher in group C than those in group B( P lt; 0. 001) . Of all the parameters, only absolute humidity showed a significant improvment in group A [ elevated from( 9. 9 ±1. 6) mg/L to ( 11. 9 ±0. 9) mg/L, P lt; 0. 001] . The degree of comfort in group C was significantly higher than that in group A and B [ 8. 0 ±1. 7 vs 5. 0 ±1. 2 and 3. 0 ±0. 4, respectively, P lt;0. 001] . In group A seven patients were switched to group C because of discomfort, four accepted NIPPV continuously, and two avoided invasive mechanical ventilation eventually. In group B three patients were switched to group C because of intolerance of too much condensed water in the breathing circuit, all of them accepted NIPPV continuously, and one avoided invasive mechanical ventilation eventually. Conclusions Compared with mere humidification or humidification with heating humidifier, humidification with heating humidifier and circuit heating during NIPPV can improve the absolute humidity, air temperature and patient comfort,meanwhile decreasing the sputumthickness of patients with ALI/ARDS.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV) in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( AECOPD) complicated with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure.Methods 37 patients who were admitted fromJanuary 2008 to June 2009 due to AECOPD complicated with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure and had received NPPV therapy were enrolled as a NPPV group. Another similar 42 cases who had not received NPPV therapy served as control. All subjects received standard medication therapy according to the guideline. Arterial blood gases before and after treatment, the duration of hospitalization and intubation rate were observed. Results The arterial pH, PaO2 ,and PaCO2 improved significantly after treatment as compared with baseline in both groups ( P lt; 0. 05) .Compared with the control group, the average duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter ( 10 ±5 vs.19 ±4 days, P lt;0. 05) and the intubation rate was significantly lower ( 2. 7% vs. 16. 7% , P lt;0. 05) in the NPPV group. Conclusion The use of NPPV in AECOPD patients complicated with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure is effective in improving arterial blood gases, reducing the duration of hospitalization and intubation rate.
Objective To investigate the effects of different inspiratory rise time during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation ( NPPV) on work of breathing in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD) . Methods Eleven patients with acute exacerbation of COPD received different inspiratory rise time ( 0. 1sec, 0. 3sec, 0. 5sec) during NPPV. The changes of inspiratory muscle effort and breathing pattern of the patients were observed. Results The average respiratory rate,minute ventilation, and tidal volume were higher during NPPV compared with spontaneous breathing. But the changes of average minute ventilation and tidal volume were not significant ( P gt; 0. 05) . The pressure time product ( PTP) , transdiaphragmatic pressure ( Pdi) , and work of breathing of inspiratory muscle reduced significantly during different inspiratory rise time as compared with spontaneous breathing ( P lt;0. 01) . PTP,Pdi, and work of breathing reduced 59. 2% , 62. 7% , and 49% respectively when inspiratory rise time was 0. 1sec. They reduced more significantly during inspiratory rise time of 0. 1sec. Conclusions The present study confirms NPPV can unload inspiratory muscles in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. It is more effective to reduce inspiratory load when inspiratory rise time is set at 0. 1sec while the patients feel most comfortable.
Objective To evaluate the efficiency and associated factors of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV) in the treatment of acute lung injury( ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome( ARDS) .Methods Twenty-eight patients who fulfilled the criteria for ALI/ARDS were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to receive either noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV group) or oxygen therapy through a Venturi mask( control group) . All patients were closely observed and evaluated during observation period in order to determine if the patients meet the preset intubation criteria and the associated risk factors. Results The success rate in avoiding intubation in the NPPV group was 66. 7%( 10/15) , which was significantly lower than that in the control group ( 33. 3% vs. 86. 4% , P = 0. 009) . However, there was no significant difference in the mortality between two groups( 7. 7% vs.27. 3% , P =0. 300) . The incidence rates of pulmonary bacteria infection and multiple organ damage were significantly lower in the NPPV success subgroup as compared with the NPPV failure group( 2 /10 vs. 4/5, P =0. 01;1 /10 vs. 3/5, P = 0. 03) . Correlation analysis showed that failure of NPPV was significantly associated with pulmonary bacterial infection and multiple organ damage( r=0. 58, P lt;0. 05; r =0. 53, P lt;0. 05) . Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that pulmonary bacterial infection was an independent risk factor associated with failure of NPPV( r2 =0. 33, P =0. 024) . In the success subgroup, respiratory rate significantly decreased( 29 ±4 breaths /min vs. 33 ±5 breaths /min, P lt; 0. 05) and PaO2 /FiO2 significantly increased ( 191 ±63 mmHg vs. 147 ±55 mmHg, P lt;0. 05) at the time of 24 hours after NPPV treatment as compared with baseline. There were no significant change after NPPV treatment in heart rate, APACHEⅡ score, pH and PaCO2 ( all P gt;0. 05) . On the other hand in the failure subgroup, after 24 hours NPPV treatment, respiratory rate significantly increased( 40 ±3 breaths /min vs. 33 ±3 breaths /min, P lt;0. 05) and PaO2 /FiO2 showed a tendency to decline( 98 ±16 mmHg vs. 123 ±34 mmHg, P gt; 0. 05) . Conclusions In selected patients, NPPV is an effective and safe intervention for ALI/ARDS with improvement of pulmonary oxygenation and decrease of intubation rate. The results of current study support the use of NPPV in ALI/ARDS as the firstline choice of early intervention with mechanical ventilation.
【摘要】目的 探讨护理干预对无创正压通气(NIPPV)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭的影响。方法 2006年1月〖CD3/5〗2008年1月将47例患者随机分为干预组和对照组,两组均给予常规药物加NIPPV治疗。干预组24例应用NIPPV治疗期间,专人给予护理干预,与对照组(给予常规护理)23例比较,观察两组2、24、48、72 h血气变化及病情转归。结果 两组动脉血气分析差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.01)。干预组24例中仅1例改换为有创机械通气,余23例顺利完成治疗。对照组12例顺利完成治疗,3例勉强完成治疗,5例于治疗中改换为有创机械通气,2例上机后1 h内不能耐受而拒绝NIPPV,放弃抢救自动出院,1例因急性消化道大出血抢救无效死亡。结论 专人护理干预提高了双水平NIPPV治疗COPD急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭的临床疗效,减少气管插管有创机械通气给患者带来的痛苦及相关并发症,节约了费用,提高了生活质量。