目的 比较无创双水平正压通气（BiPAP）平均容积保证压力支持（AVAPS）模式与同步/时间控制（S/T）模式在肥胖的慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）患者并发急性Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭中的治疗作用。 方法 选取2012年3月－2013年6月入院治疗且体质量指数（BMI）＞25 kg/m2的COPD发生急性Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者36例，按数字随机表法分为AVAPS组与S/T组。两组的基础治疗相同，AVAPS组采用飞利浦伟康V60呼吸机BiPAP AVAPS模式进行无创通气治疗，S/T组采用相同机型BiPAP S/T模式治疗。分别比较两组患者治疗1、6、24、72 h的格拉斯高昏迷（GCS）评分变化、血气分析结果、呼吸机监测数据。 结果 AVAPS组患者在最初治疗的6 h内GCS评分高于S/T组[1 h：（13.2 ± 0.6）、（11.9 ± 0.6） 分，P＜0.05；6 h：（13.8 ± 0.5）、（12.1 ± 0.6）分，P＜0.05]；24 h内的动脉血气酸碱度pH值改善[1 h：7.31 ± 0.03、7.26 ± 0.02，P＜0.05；6 h：7.37 ± 0.05、7.31 ± 0.04，P＜0.05]；24 h：7.40 ± 0.04、7.33 ± 0.03，P＜0.05]及二氧化碳分压下降[1 h：（65.2 ± 5.1）、（69.5 ± 4.1）mm Hg（1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa），P＜0.05；6 h：（61.4 ± 4.2）、（66.7 ± 4.3） mm Hg，P＜0.05；24 h：（58.2 ± 4.5）、（64.3 ± 5.4） mm Hg，P＜0.05）]优于S/T组，24 h内浅快呼吸指数低于S/T组[1 h：（35.2 ± 8.1）、（62.8 ± 13.2）次/（min·L），P＜0.05]；6 h（33.4 ± 7.8） 、（54.8 ± 11.6）次/（min·L），P＜0.05]，同时，减少了额外的人工参数调整次数[3.4 ± 1.1、1.2 ± 0.6），P＜0.05] 结论 对超重的COPD合并急性Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者采用AVAPS模式进行无创通气治疗，较S/T模式能更快地恢复意识水平，更快地降低血二氧化碳分压、改善pH值，同时减少了呼吸治疗师的人工操作次数。
【摘要】 目的 总结先天性心脏病术后无创通气的监护。 方法 2008年1-12月胸外ICU 36例先天性心脏病术后患儿，在使用无创通气前后监测血压、心率、呼吸及血气变化。 结果 与无创通气前相比，无创通气后30 min、1 h、2 h的指标均恢复到满意水平，循环稳定。 结论 通过采用无创通气，80%的患儿避免了再次插管，缩短有创通气时间，同时避免了相关的呼吸道并发症，缩短了患儿住院时间，节省了医疗费用，提升了先天性心脏病患儿术后成活率。【Abstract】 Objective To summarize the nursing experience of noninvasive ventilation for infants with congenital heart disease after the surgery. Methods A total of 36 patients who underwent noninvasive ventilation from January to December 2008 were enrolled. The blood pressure, heart rate, respiration, and blood gas were recorded and analyzed before and after noninvasive ventilation. Results Compared with the results before noninvasive ventilation, all of the indexes returned to a satisfying level and the circulation kept stable 30 minutes, one hour, and two hours after noninvasive ventilation. Conclusion Noninvasive ventilation may avoid reintubation, shorten the invasive ventilatory time, decrease the respiratory complications, shorten the time of hospitalization, save the medical expenses, and promote the survival rate of infants with congenital heart disease.
建立人工气道实施机械通气是治疗严重呼吸衰竭过程中挽救患者生命最常用的措施之一，然而通过人工气道的机械通气也增加了相关并发症发生的机会，如呼吸机相关性肺炎（VAP）等[1]。多数患者在应用呼吸机进行通气支持治疗中，当呼吸衰竭及其病因的病情缓解或明显改善时就可以解除人工气道和终止通气支持，但20%~30%的患者需要逐渐解除呼吸机的通气支持，谓之撤机（Weaning）[1]。尽管文献中撤机的定义略有不同，但主要指的是需要逐步减弱及停止通气支持和解除人工气道的一个时间过程。有慢性呼吸功能不全的患者撤机尤为困难，撤机困难患者的撤机时间可占总机械通气时间的40%[2]。机械通气时间延长与VAP发生率和病死率增加相关。一般来说，机械通气时间gt;3 d，VAP的发生率增加；机械通气时间gt;5 d，并发的VAP为晚发性医院获得性肺炎（HAP），其感染的病原体多为耐多药细菌，治疗难度加大，病死率高于早发性HAP。因此，对于机械通气患者来说，一旦建立人工气道实施有创通气，就应该积极创造条件，尽快撤机，去除人工气道。然而过快地降低和停止通气支持以及过早的气管拔管，可导致撤机失败和再插管。因此时机不成熟的撤机和延时撤机同样可造成机械通气时间过长，导致VAP发生率和病死率升高，以及医疗费用增加[2]。撤机的模式和方法有多种，但最佳的撤机方式仍有争议[1]。近年来无创通气（NIV）作为一种撤机方式用于临床已引起人们的兴趣和关注，但至今临床研究所得结论并未达到一致，NIV是否可以作为一种常规撤机方式用于临床尚无定论。本文通过总结近年来相关的临床研究，评价NIV用于机械通气撤机的可行性和利弊，探讨需进一步优化研究方案来解决的有关问题。
Objective To compare the effects of oxygen therapy and local pressurization in alleviating plateau hypoxia at high altitude. Methods Forty-five healthy male soldiers were investigated at an altitude of 3992 meters. The subjects were randomly divided into three groups, ie. an oxygen inhalation group, a single-soldier oxygen increasing respirator ( SOIR) group and a BiPAP group. The oxygen inhalation group was treated with oxygen inhalation via nasal catheter at 2 L/ min. SOIR was used to assist breath in the SOIR group. The BiPAP group were treated with bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation, with IPAP of 10 cm H2O and EPAP of 4 cmH2 O. PaO2, PaCO2, SpO2 and heart rate were measured before and 30 minutes after the treatment. Results There were continuous increase of PaO2 from ( 53. 30 ±4. 88) mm Hg to( 58. 58 ±5. 05) mm Hg and ( 54. 43 ±3. 01) mm Hg to ( 91. 36 ±10. 99) mm Hg after BiPAP ventilation and oxygen inhalation, respectively ( both P lt; 0. 01) . However, the PaO2 of the SOIR group was decreased from( 56. 00 ±5. 75) mm Hg to ( 50. 82 ±5. 40) mm Hg( P lt; 0. 05 ) . In the other hand, the PaCO2 was increased from ( 30. 41 ±1. 51) mmHg to ( 32. 56 ±2. 98) mm Hg in the oxygen inhalation group ( P lt; 0. 05) , declined from( 28. 74 ±2. 91) mm Hg to ( 25. 82 ±4. 35) mm Hg in the BiPAP group( P lt;0. 05) ,and didn’t change significantly from( 28. 65 ±2. 78) mm Hg to ( 29. 75 ±3. 89) mmHg in the SOIR group ( P gt;0. 05) . Conclusions Both BiPAP ventilation and oxygen inhalation can alleviate plateau hypoxia by improving PaO2 at 3992 meter altitude while SOIR has no significant effect.
Objective To investigate the effects of noninvasive ventilation for the treatment of acute respiratory failure secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome ( SARS) . Methods 127 patients with complete information were collected from the database of SARS in Guangdong province, who were all consistent with the ALI/ARDS diagnostic criteria. The patients were divided into three groups depending on ventilation status, ie. a no-ventilation group, a noninvasive ventilation group, and a mechanical ventilation group. The outcome of ventilation treatmentwas followed up.Multi-factor regression analysis was conducted to analyze the relations of ventilation treatment with ARDS and mortality, and factors associated with success of noninvasive ventilation. Results As soon as the patients met the diagnostic criteria of ALI/ARDS, the patients in the noninvasive ventilation group were in more serious condition and had a higher proportion of ARDS compared with the no-ventilation group ( P lt;0. 01) . The patients in the mechanical ventilation group had a higher mortality rate ( P lt;0.01) . 6 and 7 patients in the no-ventilation group had noninvasive ventilation and invasive ventilation thereafter, respectively. 15 patients in the noninvasive group switched to invasive ventilation. Compared with the patients without ventilation ( n =45) , the patients receiving noninvasive ventilation ( n = 61) were in more serious condition and at higher risk of developing ARDS ( P lt;0. 01) , but the mortality was not different between them ( P gt; 0. 05) . The patients who continued to receive noninvasive ventilation ( n = 40) were in more serious condition, and at higher risk of developing ARDS compared with the patients without ventilation ( n = 45) ( P lt; 0. 01) . 15 patients in the noninvasive group who switched to invasive ventilation were older than those patients continuing noninvasive ventilation.Conclusions For SARS patients fulfilling the ALI/ARDS criteria, the patients underwent noninvasive ventilation are more severe, run a higher probability of developing ARDS from ALI. But earlier initiation of noninvasive ventilation has no impact on mortality. The patients who tolerate noninvasive ventilation can avoid intubation, especially for young patients. However, the time and indication of shifting from noninvasive ventilation to invasive ventilation should be emphasized.
Objective To investigate the influence of pulmonary infection on noninvasive ventilation ( NIV) therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure ( ARF) due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( AECOPD) , and evaluate the predictive value of simplified version of clinical pulmonary infection score ( CPIS) for the efficacy of NIV therapy in ARF patients with AECOPD. Methods Eighty-four patients with ARF due to AECOPD were treated by NIV, and were divided into a successful group and an unsuccessful group by the therapeutic effect of NIV. The CPIS and simplified version of CPIS between two groups was compared. The predictive value of simplified version of CPIS for the efficacy of NIV wasevaluated using ROC curve analysis. Results The CPIS and the simplified version of CPIS of the successful treatment group ( 4. 0 ±2. 8, 3. 2 ±2. 4) were lower than those of the unsuccessful group ( 8. 0 ±2. 1, 7. 2 ±1. 8) significantly ( P =0. 006, 0. 007) . The area under ROC curve ( AUC) of CPIS and simplified version of CPIS were 0. 884 and 0. 914 respectively, the cut oint of CPIS and simplified version of CPIS were 6 ( sensitivity of 78. 0% , specificity of 91. 2% ) and 5 ( sensitivity of 80. 0% , specificity of 91. 2% ) respectively. Conclusions The level of pulmonary infection is an important influencing factor on the therapeutic effect of NIV in patients with ARF due to AECOPD. Simplified version of CPIS is a helpful predictor for the effect of NIV on ARF of AECOPD.
Objective To investigate the application of sequential noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in weaning patients off mechanical ventilation after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods From July 2007 to July 2009, 52 patients who underwent CABG with mechanical ventilation for no less than 24 hours and P/F Ratio lower than 150 mm Hg were divided into two groups with random number table. In the sequential NIV group (SNIV group), there were 19 patients including 16 males and 3 females whose ages were 69.26±8.10 years. In the prolonged mechanical ventilation group (PMV group), there were 33 patients including 28 males and 5 females whose ages were 70.06±7.09 years. Clinical data of these two groups were compared and the influence of NIV on the circulation and respiration of the patients were observed. Results The SNIV group weaned off mechanical ventilation earlier than the PMV group (26.46±3.66 h vs. 38.65±9.12 h, P=0.013). The SNIV group held shorter total ventilation time (29.26±21.56 h vs.54.45±86.57 h,P=0.016), ICU stay time (2.44±2.99 d vs. 4.89±7.42 d, P=0.028) and postoperative hospital time (10.82±4.31 d vs. 14.01±19.30 d, P=0.039) than the PMV group. Furthermore, the SNIV group had lower pneumonia rate (5.26% vs. 30.30%, P=0.033) and total postoperative complication rate (10.53% vs.45.45%, P=0.030) than the PMV group. However, there was no significant difference (Pgt;0.05) between the two groups in the successful weaning rate, repeated tracheal intubation rate, tracheotomy rate and mortality 30 days after operation. After NIV, SNIV group had no significant change in heart rate, central vein 〖CM(1585mm〗pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure than the baseline value, while systolic pressure (129.66±19.11 mm Hg vs. 119.01±20.31 mm Hg, P=0.031), cardiacindex ［3.01±0.30 L/(min.m2) vs. 2.78±0.36 L/(min.m2), P=0.043］ and P/F Ratio (205.95±27.40 mm Hg vs. 141.33±9.98 mm Hg, P=0.001) were obviously elevated. Conclusion Sequential NIV is a effective and safe method to wean CABG patients off mechanical ventilation.