ObjectiveTo systematically review the therapeutic effects and safety of new platelet inhibition regimens targeting P2Y12-receptors (prasugrel/ticagrelor) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). MethodsSuch databases as PubMed (1980 to 2013.7), EMbase (1980 to 2013.5), The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2013), CBM (1990 to 2013.7), CNKI (1994 to 2013.7), VIP (1989 to 2013.7) and WanFang Data (1980 to 2013.7) were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about comparing prasugrel/ticagrelor with clopidogrel in treating patients with ACS. Two reviewers screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsFive studies involving 43 452 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with standard clopidogrel, prasugrel/ticagrelor reduced the incidences of myocardial infarction (OR=0.83, 95%CI 0.77 to 0.89, P < 0.000 01), cardiovascular death (OR=0.86, 95%CI 0.78 to 0.94, P=0.002), and stent thrombosis (OR=0.61, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.97, P=0.04); while no advantage was found in reducing the incidences of stroke (OR=1.06, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.26, P=0.54), intracranial hemorrhage (OR=1.18, 95%CI 0.81 to 1.71, P=0.39), and severe bleeding after thrombolysis due to myocardial infarction (OR=1.17, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.47, P=0.16). ConclusionNew platelet inhibition regimens targeting P2Y12-receptors for ACS could effectively decrease the incidences of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, and stent thrombosis events. However, compared with clopidogrel, it could not improve the clinical outcomes of patients with stroke and intracranial hemorrhage. Additionally, due to the increased risk of non-CABG related bleeding, more attention should be paid to the application of new platelet inhibition regimens.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of aspirin+ticagrelor and aspirin+clopidogrel on graft patency one year after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).MethodsA total of 67 patients who received CABG in our department from January 2014 to September 2017 were included in this study (52 males and 15 females). They were randomly divided into a group A (aspirin+clopidogrel) and a group B (aspirin+ticagrelor). There were 34 participants in the group A (28 males and 6 females) and 33 patients in the group B (24 males and 9 females). All patients were invited for clinical follow-up and 64-slice multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis in 1 year postoperatively. Cardiovascular events, bleeding events and other adverse events were followed up.ResultsFour patients were lost to follow-up. Two patients died. A total of 61 patients (48 males and 13 females) completed coronary CTA, and 31 in the group A (25 males and 6 females) and 30 in the group B (23 males and 7 females). The total number of bridged vessels was 156 (59 internal thoracic artery bridges and 97 great saphenous vein bridges), including 79 in the group A (31 internal thoracic artery bridges and 48 great saphenous vein bridges) and 77 in the group B (28 internal thoracic artery bridges and 49 great saphenous vein bridges). Graft patency rate 1 year post CABG was 82.3% (65/79) in the group A and 92.2% (71/77) in the group B (P>0.05). Artery graft patency rate 1 year post CABG was 96.8% (30/31) in the group A and 96.4% (27/28) in the group B (P>0.05). Saphenous vein graft patency rate 1 year post CABG was 72.9% (35/48) in the group A and 89.8% (44/49) in the group B (P<0.05). Multivariable analysis with binary logistic regression showed ticagrelor use reduced graft occlusion (OR=0.282, 95%CI 0.093 to 0.862, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups.ConclusionCompared with clopidogrel plus aspirin, ticagrelor added to aspirin after CABG may enhance the saphenous graft patency without the excess risk of bleeding 1 year post CABG.