find
Author
"李小萍" 2 results
-
目的 了解高校护理本科生（下称护生）在临床实习阶段对带教教师的具体期望，为临床带教老师的培养提供依据。 方法 以杜威的反思思维理论为基础，使用Van Manen的诠释现象学研究方法暨反思日记分析，于2011年1月对67名护生的临床反思日记进行分析；同时采用自行设计的问卷就护生对临床教学的评价进行调查。 结果 护生对临床带教教师的反思主要集中于5个主题，即期望带教老师制定合理的、有针对性的带教计划并采用灵活多样的教学手段，期望得到带教老师的肯定和鼓励，期望得到独立实践护理角色的机会，期望带教老师注重培养护生的临床思维能力，期望带教老师拥有良好的综合素质；护生对临床教学评价总平均分为（4.51 ± 0.06）分，得分率为87.3%。 结论 临床带教老师在不断提升自身综合素质的同时，应根据护理本科人才能力培养目标制定合理的实习计划，选择恰当的教学方式，提供良好的临床学习环境，以进一步提高临床教学质量。
-
【摘要】 目的 分析评估四年制医技专业医院感染控制与职业防护考试试卷的质量。 方法 应用相关试卷分析软件，对64名医技专业学生——医院感染控制与职业防护期末考试试卷进行统计分析。 结果 64名学生中，最高分为86.00，最低分为49.50，平均分为67.70，及格率为82.80%；全部学生考试成绩为49.50～86.00（67.69±8.74）分，基本在正常范围；全套试卷全客观题难度为0.69，区分度为0.15；非全客观题难度为0.68，区分度为0.22，信度为0.72。学生考试失分情况为：单项选择题19.90%、是非判析题22.90%、名词解释29.70%、简答题50.00%。 结论 此套试卷质量符合教学大纲要求；客观题比例较大，难度较高；区分度尚可，信度可靠。客观地评价了学生对此课程的掌握程度，但学生分析归纳能力需要加强。【Abstract】 Objective To examine and evaluate the final test paper of nosocomial infection control and prevention of occupational exposure for four-year medical technology undergraduate students. Methods We used paper analysis software to perform statistical analysis for the results of the final test paper of nosocomial infection control and prevention of occupational exposure for 64 students of medical technology. Results Of the 64 students, the highest score was 86.00, the lowest score was 49.50, and the average score was 67.70 with a passing rate of 82.80%. The test scores were between 49.50 to 86.00 (67.69±8.74), presenting a normal distribution. The difficulty degree of items with all objective questions was 0.69 with a discrimination of 0.15; and the difficulty degree of other items was 0.68 with a discrimination of 0.22 and a reliability of 0.72. The rates of point loss in the examination were 19.90% for single choice questions, 22.90% for true or false analysis, 29.70% for glossary, and 50.00% for questions demanding for brief answers. Conclusion Overall, this set of papers is consistent with national teaching guideline with a large proportion of relatively difficult objective questions. The discrimination and reliability are acceptable in evaluating students’ ability objectively. However, students’ capacity of analyzing and summarizing still needs to be strengthened in the future.
Release date：2016-09-08 09:24
Export
PDF
Favorites
Scan
