目的研究置管溶栓联合球囊扩张导管碎栓治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成（DVT）的疗效及安全性。 方法回顾性分析2011年9月至2015年1月本院收治的82例急性下肢DVT患者的临床资料。将患者分成两组：A组行单纯经导管直接溶栓（CDT）治疗，共32例，其中男10例、女22例，平均年龄（56±15）岁；B组行CDT联合机械碎栓（球囊扩张导管碎栓）治疗，共50例，其中男18例、女32例，平均年龄（57±17）岁。比较2组治疗前后静脉通畅率、静脉通畅度评分、健侧和患侧下肢周径差，比较2组尿激酶用量及溶栓导管留置时间，以出血并发症、肺栓塞的发生率评价治疗的安全性。 结果2组共82例患者完成溶栓及碎栓疗程，B组较A组溶栓时间更短，A组平均9（7，12）d；B组平均5（4，7）d，2组差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）；B组较A组尿激酶用量更少，A组平均7.250（6.355，8.255）×106 U，B组平均4.925（3.715，5.810）×106 U，2组差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）；B组治疗后的静脉通畅度评分显著优于A组，A组65.0%（40.5%，86.5%），B组为100%（90%，100%），差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。治疗后2组出血并发症发生率差异无统计学意义（P=0.0976）。2组患者随访时间3～18个月，A组随访率50.0%，B组随访率58.0%，均未发生肺动脉栓塞。 结论在下腔静脉滤器保护下，CDT联合球囊扩张导管碎栓治疗急性下肢DVT较单纯CDT治疗，溶栓效果好、尿激酶用量少、不增加肺栓塞及出血发生率。
ObjectiveTo compare vein valve function following pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) with simple catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for deep vein thrombosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of sixty patients who suffered acute lower extremity deep vein thrombsis in our hospital between October 2016 and March 2017. All patients underwent contralateral preprocedural duplex and bilateral postprocedure duplex to access patency and valve function. The patients were divided into three groups including a group A with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) alone (36 patients with 20 males and 16 females at average age of 56 years), a group B with PMT alone (15 patients with 8 males and 7 females at average age of 55 years), and a group C with PMT combined CDT (9 patients with 4 males and 5 females at average age of 56 years). The valve function was compared among the Group A, Group B and Group C.ResultsThere were 40.0% (24/60) patients with bilateral femoral vein valve reflux, 40.0% (24/60) patients with unilateral femoral vein valve reflux (all in the treated limbs), 20% (12/60) patients had no reflux in both limbs. Of the limbs treated with CDT alone, PMT alone and PMT combined CDT, the rate of valve reflux was 38.9% (14/36), 33.3% (5/15), and 55.6% (5/9) respectively (P=0.077).ConclusionIn the patients suffering acute DVT, PMT or PMT combined CDT does not hamper valve function compared with CDT alone.