west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "李秀婷" 3 results
  • Study of the Relationship between Operating Room Working Environment and Facial Skin Damage in Nurses

    ObjectiveTo understand the status of the nurse facial skin damage because of regular exposure to a variety of environmental damage factors, in order to cause enough attention and find the solution. MethodsBetween January 2013 and June 2014, we used a self-made questionnaire to survey 122 operating room nurses from grade three first-rate hospitals by random sampling on the facial skin damage status. Then, we analyzed the risk factors of operating room nurses facial skin damage and put forward such countermeasures as improving working environment, increasing service facilities, reducing pollution and biological, chemical, psychological factors, and selecting and using surgical masks properly and promoting facial skin protective measures. ResultsThe survey showed that 93.3% of all the investigated operating room nurses had facial skin problems which mainly was rough dry skin (99.2%); 76.7% of the nurses thought that it was related to the nature of work, and 72.5% of them considered that metal fatigue was the main influence factor. ConclusionWe should strengthen the nurses’ own protection consciousness, enact all kinds of protective measures, strictly implement the system of protection and take effective protective measures as to reduce the operating room nurses facial skin damage.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 手术室护士足部皮肤损伤影响因素及防护对策分析

    目的探讨引起手术室护士足部皮肤损伤的因素,寻求相关的防护对策。 方法2012年6月-2013年5月对150名手术室护士跟踪调查,针对足部皮肤损伤的相关因素,改善工作环境,增加防护措施,加强学习教育,合理工作安排,实施人性化管理。 结果在干预前,150名护士足部皮肤均有不同程度的增厚、干燥,其中57名护士足跟部发生皲裂,93名被手术室内手术用品和(或)设备挂碰致皮肤破损(34名发生感染)。干预后132名护士未发生皮肤增厚、干燥;7名发生皲裂;11名被设备挂碰,挂碰后及时处理未发生皮肤感染。 结论手术室护士在日常工作中加强相应的防护对策可以有效地降低职业损伤,减轻身心压力。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • A Comparative Study of the Effects of Povidone Iodine Handwashing with Brush and Brush-free Handwashing on the Hand Skin of Nurses in Operation Room

    ObjectiveTo compare the effects of povidone iodine handwashing with brush and brush-free handwashing on the hand skin condition of nurses in operation room. MethodA random sampling method was used to choose 150 nurses from the operation room of a grade-3 class-A hospital as our study subjects from June 2013 to December 2014. They were randomly divided into control group and study group according to the random number table with 75 in each. The control group used the traditional povidone iodine handwashing with brush, while the study group applied brush-free handwashing method. Then, we compared the hand skin condition and disinfection effect of these two kinds of handwashing methods. ResultsThe control group had dry skin in 34 nurses (45.3%), dry desquamation in 9 (12.0%), tight feeling in 51 (68.0%), and allergy in 5 (6.7%). The study group had dry skin in 19 nurses (25.3%), dry desquamation in 0 (0.0%), tension in 21 (28.0%), and allergy in 0 (0.0%). The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). ConclusionsThe brush-free handwashing method is able to achieve the requirements of surgical hand disinfection, and can protect the skin of nurses in operation room.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content