目的 了解5.12汶川大地震24个月后震区小学生的心理健康状况，为进行震后长期心理危机干预提供依据。 方法 于2010年5月即汶川大地震发生后24个月，分别使用创伤应激量表儿童版（CRIES-13）、儿童抑郁障碍自评量表（DSRSC）、长处与困难问卷（SDQ）学生版，调查了553名来自于彭州灾区的小学生的心理健康状况及其影响因素。 结果 ① 灾区小学生CRIES-13总分为（22.98 ± 12.29）分，其中大于划界分（30分）者为143人，占总人数的25.9%；女性总分高于男性（Z=?2.031，P=0.042）；震后被转移至安全地点的时间越长（OR=1.025，P=0.012）、家人伤亡越严重（OR=1.141，P=0.021），其CRIES-13总分大于划界分的可能性越高。② 灾区小学生DSRSC总分为（11.07 ± 5.78）分，其中总分大于划界分（15分）者为120人，占总人数的21.7%；女性总分高于男性（Z=?2.508，P=0.012）；灾区小学生的年龄（r=0.098，P=0.021）、震后被转移至安全地点的时间（r=0.117，P=0.004）与DSRSC总分呈正相关。③ 灾区小学生SDQ总困难因子得分为（14.97 ± 5.44）分，62.9%的人报告自身存在主观困难；女性的情绪因子、亲社会因子得分高于男性（Z=?3.123，P=0.002；Z=?2.243，P=0.025）；年龄越大，品行因子（χ2=7.604，P=0.023）、亲社会因子（χ2=8.102；P=0.017）得分增加。 结论 震后灾区小学生的心理健康状况受到性别、年龄、震后被转移至安全地点的时间、家人伤亡程度的影响，震后长期心理危机干预应综合考虑这些相关因素以确定高危人群。
ObjectiveTo explore the family function on patients with depression and its influential factors, in order to provide a basis for family support treatment for the patients. MethodsA total of 122 depressed patients from Mental Health Center of West China Hospital between February 2012 and June 2013, and one of their family members were chosen to be the study subjects. Another 122 non-clinical controls and one of their family members were recruited from a community near Sichuan University were regarded as the controls. All the subjects were asked to finish the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and the Family Assessment Device (FAD). Additionally, the patients received a diagnostic interview to provide the features of their depression. ResultsThe general average score of Q-LES-Q in families with depressed patients was significantly lower than that in the control families (t=-6.243, P<0.01). The general average score of each dimension in FAD for families with depressed patients was significantly higher than that for control families (t=3.644, 3.872, 2.694, 3.369, 5.369, 4.941, 5.241; P<0.01). According to FAD health division scoring, the unhealthy proportion in terms of communication, emotional reaction, emotional link, behavioral control and general function for families with depressed patients was significantly higher than that for control families (χ2=6.778, 23.698, 26.580, 39.875, 17.123, 10.712; P<0.05). The Q-LES-Q scores and the five FAD dimensional scores (except role and affective involvement) were negatively correlated (r=-0.388, -0.188, -0.200, -0.276, -0.370; P<0.05). The scores of perceived social support for families with depressed patients had significant positive correlations with the scores of all FAD dimensions except affective involvement (r=0.363, 0.345, 0.244, 0.418, 0.328, 0.457; P<0.05). The risk factors for unhealthy family function included: female (OR=1.141, P<0.05), poor education (OR=0.948, P<0.01), first-episode (OR=1.416, P<0.05), suicidal attempt (OR=1.014, P<0.05), incomplete suicide (OR=1.367, P<0.01) and depression episode number (OR=1.035, P<0.05). ConclusionDepression is associated with impaired family function in Chinese families. Female, poor education, first episode of depression, suicidal attempt, incomplete suicide and depression episode number are the influential factors for family function on patients with depression.
Objective To analyze the nurses' current view and perceptions of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) by a questionnaire and to promote the clinical application of ERAS. Methods We conducted a questionnaire study for nurses who attended the First West China Forum on Chest ERAS in Chengdu during September 26-27, 2016 and 259 questionnaires were collected for descriptive analysis. Results (1) The application status of ERAS: There were 13.5% responders whose hospital took a wait-an-see attitude, while the others' hospital took different actions for ERAS; 85.7% of nurses believed that ERAS in all surgeries should be used; 58.7% of nurses believed that the concept of ERAS was more in theory than in the practice; 40.2% of nurses thought that all patients were suitable for the application of ERAS; (2) 81.9% of nurses believed that the evaluation criteria of ERAS should be a combination of the average hospital stay, patients’ comprehensive feelings and social satisfaction; (3) 70.7% of nurses thought that the combination of subjects integration, surgery orientation and surgeon-nurse teamwork was the best model of ERAS; 44.8% of nurses thought the hospital administration was the best way to promote ERAS applications; (4) 69.1% of responders believed that immature plan, no consensus and norms and insecurity for doctors were the reasons for poor compliance of ERAS; 79.5% of nurses thought that the ERAS meeting should include the publicity of norms and consensus, analysis and implementation of projects and the status and progress of ERAS. Conclusion ERAS concept has been recognized by most nurses. Multidisciplinary collaboration and hospital promotion is the best way to achieve clinical applications.