west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "杨召" 2 results
  • 应用阻隔式皮瓣迟延法修复四肢皮肤缺损

    应用阻隔式皮瓣迟延法修复四肢创伤后皮肤缺损骨外露7例,其中6例伤口1期愈合,皮瓣100%存活,有1例皮瓣坏死10%,经换药伤口痊愈。本法有如下优点:①手术操作简单。②疗效肯定、安全可靠。③供受区均不必牺牲知名血管。④突破了传统皮瓣长、宽比例。

    Release date:2016-09-01 11:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • A STUDY ON BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CHEMICALLY EXTRACTED ACELLULAR PERIPHERAL NERVE

    Objective To investigate the differences in biomechanical properties between fresh and chemically extracted acellular peri pheral nerve. Methods Thirty-six sciatic nerves were harvested from 18 adult male Wistar rats of 3 months old and randomly assigned into 3 groups (n=12 per group): normal control group (group A), the nerve segments received no treatment; Sondell method group (group B), the nerve segments were chemically extracted with the detergents of Triton X-100 and sodium deoxycholate; and improved method group (group C), chemically extracted acellular treatment of nerve was done with the detergents of Triton X-200, Sulfobetaine-10 (SB-10), and SB-16. After the acellularization, the structural changes of nerves in each group were observed by HE staining and field emission scanning electron microscope,then the biomechanical properties of nerves were tested using mechanical apparatus (Endura TEC ELF 3200). Results HE staining and field emission scanning electron microscope showed that the effect of acellularization of group C was similar to that of group B, but the effects of demyel ination and integrity of nerve fiber tube of group C were better than those of group B; the structure of broken nerves was more chaotic than before biomechanical test. The biomechanical test showed that the ultimate load, ultimate stress, ultimate strain, mechanical work to fracture in group A were the largest, the next was group C, the least was group B; the tenacity and elastic modulus in group C were the largest, the next was group B, the least was group A; but the differences were not significant (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with Sondell method, the nerve treated by improved method is more appropriate for use in vivo.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:04 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content