Temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is a general term for a group of diseases. Clinically, it often presents as pain in the temporomandibular joint and surrounding muscles and soft tissues, often involving the temporomandibular joint, chewing muscles, and anterior joint area. There are also abnormalities in jaw movement, function, joint sounds, crushing sounds, and murmurs. This article provides a review of the epidemiology, etiology, clinical characteristics, auxiliary examinations, rehabilitation assessment, and rehabilitation treatment of TMD, in order to improve understanding of TMD rehabilitation assessment and provide reference for clinical rehabilitation treatment of TMD.
Objective To observe and study the effect of neuromuscular exercise (NEMEX) on pain and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods From December 2016 to December 2017, a total of 70 participants with degenerative KOA were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 35 participants in each group. The participants in the observation group received 8-weeks NEMEX, and the ones in the control group received 8-week quadriceps strengthening. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale and the WOMAC physical functional subscale were used to measure pain and physical function before treatment and after 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks of treatment. Results The WOMAC pain scores of participants before treatment and after 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks of treatment were 24.2±10.0, 23.4±9.1, 18.9±8.2, 15.0±6.3, 15.0±7.0, respectively in the observation group, and 25.6±9.8, 24.1±9.2, 20.2±8.8, 15.2±6.0, 11.4±5.3, respectively in the control group. After 1 week of treatment, neither group showed a significant change in pain than pretreatment (P>0.05), but after 2, 4, 8 weeks of treatment, both groups showed significant improvements in pain (P<0.05). There was no significant between-group difference in pain before treatment or after 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks of treatment (P>0.05), but after 8 weeks of treatment, statistically significant difference in WOMAC pain score was found between the two groups (t=2.439, P<0.05). The WOMAC physical function scores of participants before treatment and after 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks of treatment were 94.3±31.0, 81.8±28.3, 68.9±22.1, 34.0±15.1, 22.0±8.0, respectively in the observation group, and 92.7±31.8, 82.6±29.3, 75.2±22.9, 52.2±20.0, 43.4±18.2 respectively in the control group. After 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment, both groups showed significant changes in WOMAC physical function scores than pretreatment (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant between-group difference before treatment or after 1, 2 weeks of treatment in physical function (P>0.05). The functional improvements in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (t=–4.287, –6.355; P<0.05). Conclusion NEMEX and quadriceps strengthening have similar effects in relieve pain in patients with KOA. And both exercises can effectively improve the physical function, and NEMEX is better than quadriceps strengthening on physical function improvement in patients with KOA.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of selective exercise training technique combined with ultrasound therapy on patellofemoral pain syndrome. MethodsPatients who met the research criteria were assigned into treatment group and control group randomly between July 2011 and August 2012. Each group had 28 patients. There were no significant differences in gender, age and body mass index between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in the treatment group received selective exercise therapy and ultrasound therapy, while patients in the control group received normal exercise treatment and ultrasound therapy. Knee numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and knee functional obstruction assessment were performed on all the patients before treatment and 5 days after treatment (on the 6th day) for comparison. ResultsBefore treatment, the score of NPRS in the treatment group and the control group was 4.7±0.8 and 4.8±0.9, respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05). The score of functional obstruction assessment was 11.2±2.2 and 12.2±2.7 in the two groups without significant difference (P>0.05). Five days after treatment, the NPRS score decreased to 2.1±0.5 in the treatment group and 4.2±1.0 in the control group, and the knee functional obstruction assessment score decreased to 6.4±1.9 and 11.1±2.6, respectively. Both groups improved significantly in NPRS score and knee functional obstruction assessment score (P＜0.05), while the treatment group exhibited more improvement in the two scores than the control group (P＜0.05). ConclusionSelective exercise training is effective for improving the pain and function of patients with patellofemoral syndrome.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of kinesio-taping therapy on hemifacial spasm.MethodsPatients with hemifacial spasm in the Rehabilitation Medical Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University from June 2015 to December 2018 were included. They were randomly divided into the kinesio-taping group and control group. The patients in the control group underwent ultrashort wave therapy and facial muscle function training: once a day, 10 days as a course of treatment; 2 days rest between each course; a total of 3 courses of treatment. In the kinesio-taping group, besides the original treatment, the kinesio-taping therapy was added: once a day, 10 times as a course of treatment; 2 days rest between each course; a total of 3 courses of treatment. The clinical effect of the two groups was observed.ResultsA total of 60 patients were included, with 30 in each of the two groups. There was no significant difference in the classification of facial muscle spasm between the two groups before the treatment (Z=−0.233, P=0.816). After the treatment, the difference in the classification of facial muscle spasm between the two groups was statistically significant (Z=−3.062, P=0.002); while both the kinesio-taping group (Z=−4.688, P< 0.001) and the control group (Z=−3.804, P< 0.001) improved compared with those before the treatment. The effect of kinesio-taping group [93.33% (28/30)] was better than that of the control group [76.67% (23/30)] (Z=−3.073, P=0.002).ConclusionKinesio-taping therapy can relieve the stiffness and pain caused by facial spasm, promote the recovery of facial muscle sensory function and bilateral coordinated movement, and relieve the clinical symptoms of patients,with the advantages of simple operation and good effect.
Objective To investigate whether an internet-based neck-specific training program can alleviate pain and disability in participants with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods Patients diagnosed with CSR at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between March 2022 and September 2022 were randomly allocated to either an telehabilitation group or a traditional treatment group. The primary outcome measures included Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index, and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcome measures included the Euroqol group’s 5-Domain questionnaire, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Tanaka Jingjiu cervical spondylosis symptom scale (20 points) and satisfaction. Quantitative outcome measures were collected at baseline, 12th and 24th weeks after the first intervention, while qualitative outcome measures were collected at 24th weeks after the first intervention. Results A total of 90 patients were included, with 45 in each group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender and other demography characteristics and general data (P>0.05). There is no interaction effect (group × time) for the Tanaka Jingjiu cervical spondylosis symptom scale (20 points) (P>0.05), the interaction effects (group × time) for other quantitative outcome measures were statistically significant (P<0.05). The time effect showed significant statistical differences across all quantitative outcome measures (P<0.001), while the group effect did not exhibit any significant statistical differences (P>0.05). The comparison results within the group showed that at different time points, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.001). There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups in terms of qualitative outcome measures (P>0.05) . Conclusions An internet-based neck-specific training program or traditional treatment for 12 weeks can effectively reduce pain and disability among CSR patients, with significant long-term effects. There was no significant difference in treatment effectiveness between the two groups.