目的 讨论B型超声定位下颈内静脉穿刺置管的经验。方法 回顾我中心2008年11月至2009年4月期间采用B型超声定位行颈内静脉置管的286例患者的临床资料。结果 一次性穿刺成功率为99.3%（284/286），置管成功率为100%（286/286）； 穿刺时间50 s~12 min，平均106.8 s； 带管时间5～64 d，平均13 d； 未出现血气胸、皮下血肿等并发症。结论 B型超声定位下颈内静脉穿刺操作简单、方便、安全，适用于各级别医院。在颈短肥胖，被动体位情况下，B型超声定位下置管优势大于传统的盲探法及彩色多普勒超声引导下置管法。
Objective To study the suitable operation method of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods The clinical data of 149 elderly patients with acute cholecystitis were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into two groups according to the operation: open cholecystectomy group (OC group, n=76) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (LC group, n=73). Some clinical data were compared in this paper such as operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, time of resumption of food, time of intestinal function recovery and complications. Results No marked difference was found between OC group and LC group about basic data except WBC count and examination of gallbladder by B ultrasound（P＞0.05）. But there were significant difference in operation time, blood loss, time of resumption of food, time of intestinal function recovery, length of hospital stay and complications between OC group and LC group （P＜0.01）. Conclusion Individualized treatment should be emphasized on elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Selection of OC or LC to these patients should be based on the clinical condition and taken the safety as the first principle.
目的探讨经皮经肝胆管穿刺引流（PTCD）、经皮腹腔穿刺引流及Roux-en-Y胆管空肠吻合术序贯治疗高位胆管损伤合并胆漏的疗效。方法对我中心2004年5月至2009年5月期间收治的5例高位胆管损伤合并胆漏的患者，应用PTCD、经皮腹腔穿刺引流、Roux-en-Y胆管空肠吻合术序贯治疗过程及疗效进行回顾性分析。结果5例患者均获痊愈，随访3~24个月，未发生胆管再次狭窄、胆管炎等并发症。结论PTCD、经皮腹腔穿刺引流后，再进行Roux-en-Y胆管空肠吻合术是治疗高位胆管损伤合并胆漏的首选方法。
Objective To evaluate the use of fast track surgery （FTS） in the treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of common bile duct （CBD） by combination of laparoscope and duodenoscope. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD underwent laparoscopic cholecyst-ectomy （LC） and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） were divided into FTS group （n=55） and conventional group （n=65），which were accepted the perioperative therapy of FTS or conventional therapy，respectively. After operation，the incision pain，nausea and vomiting，infusion time，loss of body weight，out-of-bed time，dieting time，postoperative hospitalization，hospital costs，and complications were compared in two groups. Results Compared with the conventional group，the postoperative infusion time，dieting time，out-of-bed time，and postoperative hospitali-zation were shorter，the incidence rates of pulmonary infection，and urinary systems infection，pancreatitis，nausea and vomiting， and incision pain were lower，the loss of body weight was lower in the FTS group （P＜0.05），but the differences of WBC and serum amylase at 24 h after operation were not significant between the FTS group and conventional group（P＞0.05）. Conclusion The FTS is safe，economic，and effective in the treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD by combination of laparoscope and duodenoscope.