ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of dynamic hip screw (DHS) and intralesional curettage via Watson-Jones approach in treatment of benign bone lesions of the proximal femur.MethodsBetween March 2012 and December 2016, 20 patients (21 lesions) with benign bone tumors or tumor like conditions of proximal femurs were treated with DHS and intralesional curettage via Watson-Jones approach. Their average age was 27.8 years (range, 11-51 years), including 13 males and 7 females. The pathological diagnosis were fibrous dysplasia in 11 cases, simple bone cyst in 2 cases, aneurysmal bone cyst in 2 cases, benign fibrous histocytoma in 2 cases, giant cell tumor in 2 cases, and chondroblastoma in 1 case, including 3 pathological fractures. According to the Enneking staging system, 18 patients were in stage S1, 3 patients with pathological fractures in stage S2. There was no varus deformity or valgus deformity. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and time of full weight-bearing were recorded. X-ray film and CT were used to observe the bone graft fusion and location of DHS. Complications were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring were used to evaluate function of lower limbs.ResultsThe average operation time was 177.1 minutes (range, 110-265 minutes). The average intraoperative blood loss was 828.6 mL (range, 200-2 300 mL). There was superficial incision infection in 1 case, deep incision infection in 1 case, and hip discomfort in 1 case, respectively. All patients were followed up 6-63 months (mean, 27.4 months). The time of full weight-bearing was 2 days in 2 patients with giant cell tumor and 2 to 13 weeks with an average of 7.2 weeks in the other patients. At last follow-up, VAS and MSTS were 0.19±0.51 and 29.62±0.97 respectively, showing significant differences when compared with the values before operation (3.52±2.62 and 23.71±8.77) (t=5.565, P=0.000; t=–3.020, P=0.007 ). X-ray film showed the all bone grafts fusion with mean time of 8.2 months (range, 5-12 months). There was no pathological fracture of the femur, local tumor recurrence, chronic hip pain, dislocation, or femoral head necrosis during follow-up.ConclusionThe treatment of benign bone lesion of the proximal femur using DHS and intralesional curettage via Watson-Jones approach is a safe and effective method.
Objective To compare the curative effect of dynamic hi p screw (DHS) combined with anti-rotation screw and cannulated screw in treating patients with Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture and to provide the basis for the choice of surgical procedure. Methods Between March 2008 and September 2009, 51 patients with fresh Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture were treated with DHS combined with anti-rotation screw (DHS group) and three cannulated screws (cannulated screw group). The DHS group included 23 patients, 13 males and 10 females, aging 27-59 years (mean, 43.2 years); fracture was caused by fall ing in 1 case, by traffic accident in 17, by fall ing from height in 5 with a mean time of 27 hoursfrom injury to hospital ization (range, 12-70 hours); and 23 fractures included 9 Pauwels type II and 14 Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. The cannulated screw group included 28 patients, 12 males and 16 females, aging 20-60 years (mean, 40.7 years); fracture was caused by fall ing in 1 case, by traffic accident in 22, by fall ing from height in 5 with a mean time of 25 hours from injury to hospital ization (range, 9-38 hours); and 28 fractures included 12 Pauwels type II and 16 Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. There was no significant difference in the basel ine characteristics between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The incision heal ing of both groups by first intention was achieved. There were significant differences in operation time, incision size, operation blood loss, the cases of blood transfusion, the amount of blood transfusion, C reaction protein level on the 2nd postoperative day, and hospital ization days between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). In DHS group, anatomic reduction was observed in 20 cases (86.96%) and satisfactory reduction in 3 cases (13.04%), while in cannulated screw group, anatomic reduction was observed in 25 cases (89.29%) and satisfactory reduction in 3 cases (10.71%) ; there was no significant difference (χ2=0.660, P=1.000). The patients were followed up 12-30 months with an average of 14.8 months. There was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) in the rate of nonunion (10.71% vs. 0), the implant failure (3.57% vs. 0), and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (10.71% vs. 0) between the DHS group and the cannulated screw group. The union time was (94.5 ± 2.0) days in the DHS group and (106.0 ± 33.5) days in the cannulated screw group, showing no significant difference (t=—1.641, P=0.107). The re-opereation rates and the overall success rates were 25% and 75% in the cannulated group and were 0 and 100% in the DHS group, showing significant differences (χ2=6.650, P=0.012). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score and visualanalogue scale (VAS) score between DHS group and cannulated screw group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The optimal treatment of young adults Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture is DHS combined with anti-rotation screw with an high overall success and less compl ications.