west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "椎弓根钉棒系统" 2 results
  • 后路单枚Cage 植骨融合联合椎弓根钉棒系统治疗腰椎滑脱症

    目的 总结后路单枚Cage 植骨融合联合椎弓根钉棒系统治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效。 方法 2006年5 月- 2009 年10 月,采用后路开窗减压/ 半椎板切除,单枚Cage 植骨融合联合椎弓根钉棒系统治疗79 例腰椎滑脱症患者。男36 例,女43 例;年龄29 ~ 72 岁,平均48 岁。病程3 个月~ 10 年,中位病程6 年。滑脱节段:L3、4 3 例,L4、5 47 例,L5、S1 29 例。根据Meyerding 分度标准:Ⅰ度45 例,Ⅱ度31 例,Ⅲ度3 例。 结果 术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。患者均获随访,随访时间24 ~ 48 个月,平均36 个月。X 线片复查示植骨于3 ~ 12 个月内获骨性融合;无Cage 融合器移位或沉陷,椎弓根钉棒松动、移位、断裂以及滑脱复发等并发症发生。临床疗效根据Nakai 等评分标准,优68 例,良9 例,可2 例,优良率97.5%。术后2 周及1 年Taillard 指数、椎间隙高度、滑脱角、Boxall 指数以及腰椎生理前凸角均较术前显著改善(P lt; 0.05);术后2 周与术后1 年各指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P gt; 0.05)。 结论 后路单枚Cage 植骨融合联合椎弓根钉棒系统治疗腰椎滑脱症能提供坚强固定,复位满意,融合率高,是较理想的治疗方法之一。

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:23 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • COMPARATIVE RESEARCH OF OPERATIONS IN TREATING THORACOLUMBER SPINE FRACTURE AND DISLOCATION WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY IN DIFFERENT PERIODS

    To compare the effectiveness of the operations in treatment of thoracolumber spine fracture and dislocation with spinal cord injury in different periods. Methods Between June 2003 and June 2008, 80 cases of thoracolumber spine fracture and dislocation with spinal cord injury were treated. There were 52 males and 28 females with an average age of 37.6 years (range, 28-49 years). According to different operative time, they were divided into 2 groups by randomized controlled study: group A (n=39, operation was performed within 24 hours) and group B (n=41, operation was performed at 3-7 days). In group A, there were 23 cases of degree I-II (group A1), 16 cases of degree III-V (group A2) according to Meyerding standard, including 17 cases of grade A, 7 cases of grade B, 9 cases of grade C, and 6 cases of grade D according to Frankel scoring system. In group B, there were 21 cases of degree I-II (group B1) and 20 cases of degree III-V (group B2), including 20 cases of grade A, 7 cases of grade B, 11 cases of grade C, and 3 cases of grade D. All cases were treated with posterior spinal cord decompression and reduction, with internal fixation by pedicle screw-rod system and transforamen lumbar interbody fusion. Results The blood loss was (407.4 ± 24.3) mL in group A1 and (397.4 ± 8.2) mL in group B1, showing no significant difference (t=1.804, P=0.078); the blood loss was (1 046.9 ± 128.6) mL in group A2 and (494.4 ± 97.7) mL in group B2, showing significant difference (t=14.660, P=0.000). All 80 patients were followed up 2 years to 2 years and 6 months (mean, 2 years and 3 months) with satisfactory results in spinal cord decompression and reduction, and bony fusion was achieved at 12 months. There was no significant difference in the vertebral canal volume, vertebral height, and Cobb angle at both pre- and postoperation between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). No loosening or breakage of screws and rods occurred. At 12 months after operation, the cure rates were 47.83% (11/23) in group A1 and 19.05% (4/21) in group B1, showing significant difference (χ2=4.046, P=0.044); the cure rates were 12.50% (2/16) in group A2 and 10.00% (2/20) in group B2, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.056, P=0.813). There was no significant difference (χ2=0.024, P=0.878) in the cure rates in the patients at grades A and B before operation between group A (12.50%, 3/24) and group B (11.11%, 3/27); but there was significant difference (χ2=5.992, P=0.014) in the cure rates in the patients at grades C and D before operation between group A (66.67%, 10/15) and group B (21.43%, 3/14). Conclusion Emergency operation of posterior pedicle screw-rod system for treatment of thoracolumber spine fracture and dislocation with spinal cord injury can provide good reduction, rigid fixation, and high fusion rate, so it is asafe and effective treatment method.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:43 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content