目的 比较经皮扩张气管切开术（PDT）和开放式气管切开术（OT）在成批吸入性损伤患者中的应用效果。 方法 采用前瞻性随机性研究方法，将2006年1月－2010年12月收入三峡大学人民医院重症医学科的4批34例吸入性损伤患者，分为PDT组（n=17）和OT组（n=17），比较两组的手术时间、出血量、并发症，观察手术前后的平均动脉压（MAP）、心率（HR）、呼吸频率（R）、动脉血氧分压（PaO2）和动脉血二氧化碳分压（PaCO2）。 结果 PDT组与OT组手术时间分别为（7.0 ± 1.9）、（18.0 ± 11.4）min，差异有统计学意义（P=0.000）；PDT组与OT组出血量分别为（7.0 ± 4.4）、（19.0 ± 12.1）mL，差异有统计学意义（P=0.001）；两组患者气管切开前及切开后的MAP、HR、R、PaO2和PaCO2差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；PDT组发生出血并发症1例，OT组发生出血、皮下气肿、纵隔气肿及切口感染等并发症共6例，PDT组并发症发生率低于OT组，差异有统计学意义（P=0.034）。 结论 PDT在救治成批吸入性损伤患者时比OT更快地建立人工气道，而出血量、并发症发生率均低于OT，值得推广应用。
目的:探讨行气管切开术抢救成功的重型颅脑损伤及高血压脑出血患者直接除管的安全性和可行性。方法:在507监护仪行SPO2监测和严密观察下,不经过试阻管而直接将气管套管拔除。结果:本组除1例患者因带管时间长,切口周围气管内炎性肉芽生长而重新插管外,其余患者呼吸平稳,呼吸道通畅,无呼吸急促、呛咳、紫绀及SPO2降低。结论:此法避免了传统除管前试阻管的繁锁和由阻管而引起的多种不良反应,有临床实用价值。
目的:探讨烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者行预防性气管切开的时机和可行性, 以提高治疗中、重度吸入性损伤的疗效。方法:对80例烧伤合并气道吸入性损伤患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究,按气管切开手术不同时机分为预防性气管切开组70例与紧急气管切开组10例。70例在烧伤后(5.2±2.1)h行气管切开术,和10例在烧伤后(23.24±2.36) h行气管切开术。比较两组患者相关生命体征、血氧分压、氧饱和度、呼吸频率及预后情况。结果: 预防性气管切开组气管切开术70例患者,解除上呼吸道梗阻、改善缺氧状况69例,死亡1例。紧急气管切开组10例,死亡6例。预防性气管切开组与紧急气管切开组比较死亡率有明显降低(Plt;0.01)。结论:烧伤合并中、重度吸入性损伤应及早进行预防性气管切开术,防止呼吸道梗阻,减少并发症,降低死亡率,手术时机选择在伤后5小时内为宜。
目的 探讨ICU床旁行气管切开术中意外发现甲状腺肿大的简易处理方法。方法 对我院ICU 48例床旁气管切开术中意外发现甲状腺肿大的处理方法进行回顾性分析，观察术中出血量、术后出血和切口感染情况。结果 48例患者术中出血量无明显增多，术后无继续出血，均未发生切口感染。结论 ICU床旁行气管切开术中，意外发现的甲状腺肿大并不少见，掌握简易有效的处理方法具有积极的临床意义。
Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of the PercuTwist technique．Methods Clinical data of patients undergoing PercuTwist and traditional tracheostomy during Jan 2007 to Feb 2008 in the department of pulmonary disease of Changhai Hospital were collected and analyzed．Results Of 16 patients with PercuTwist，12 were males and 4 were females．The minimum platelet before operation was 15 X 109／L The mean operating time f from local anesthesia to connecting ventilator)was(4.3±1.0)min，and complications occurred in 2 cases with 2 incidences．Of the 12 patients with traditional tracheostomy，8 were males and 4 were females．The minimum platelet before operation was 85 X 109／L．The mean operating time was(33.3±8.6)min，and complications occurred in 8 cases with11 incidences．There were significant differences in complications and operating time between the patients with PercuTwist and the patients with traditional tracheostomy(P lt;0.001 or 0.01)．Conclusions Compared with the traditional surgical tracheostomy，the PercuTwist technique takes less operating time and causes fewer complications．
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effectiveness of two kinds of treatment methods to nurse wound after tracheotomy. MethodsWe collected 108 cases and randomly divided them into two groups between March 2012 and May 2013. The experimental group (n=52) received tracheotomy care with PermaFoam dressing, while the control group (n=56) was treated with traditional sterile absorbent gauze. We analyzed the differences in terms of infection of wound, errhysis and frequency of dressing changes between the two groups. ResultsThe experimental group had a lower rate of wound infection than the control group (P<0.05). Moreover, the experimental group was superior to the control group in the total number of dressing changes, wound redness and oozing (P<0.05). ConclusionPermaFoam dressing can reduce wound complications and frequency of dressing changes effectively. It is easy to operate, and can reduce the workload of clinical nursing, and deserves clinical application.