Abstract： Objective To study the molecular mechanism of pathologic states related to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and screen the differential proteins from the serum before and after CPB in the open heart surgery patients. Methods By the twodimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE), we took the blood samples from each of the sixteen open heart surgery patients 30 minutes before CPB, 1 hour after CPB, and 24 hours after CPB. The protein spots were analyzed by the PDQuest image analysis software and the differential protein spots were identified by matrixassisted laser desorption/ionizationtime of flightmass spectrometry (MALDITOF-MS). Then, enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine the expression level of serum amyloid A protein (SAA) in the serum of healthy people and the enrolled patients before and after CPB. Results Through 2DE in combination with massspectrometry, 7 proteins altered in expression were identified, including SAA, haptoglobin (HPT), leucinerich alpha2-glycoprotein (A2GL), hemoglobin subunit beta (HBB), serine/threonineprotein phosphatase 2A -regulatory subunit B″ subunit gamma (P2R3C), transthyretin (TTHY), and T-complex protein 11-like protein2 (T11L2). ELISA analysis showed that SAA levels in healthy people and the open heart surgery patients 30 minutes before CPB were not statistically different (t=-1.955, P=0.056), while the SAA level rose from 54.47±48.32 μg/ml 30 min before CPB to 1 017.78±189.92 μg/ml 24 hours after CPB in the serum of open heart surgery patients． Conclusion The results of this pilot study illustrate that SAA, HPT, A2GL, HBB, P2R3C, TTHY and T11L2 may be the molecule markers of pathologic state related to CPB. Acute phase reaction happens intensively after CPB in human body.
Objective To determine the influence and significance of combinative assessment of 64 multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) with serum amyloid A protein (SAA) or C-reactive protein (CRP) on the selection of operative procedures of rectal cancer under the multi-disciplinary team. Methods Prospectively enrolled patients diagnosed definitely as rectal cancer at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from February to August 2009 were randomly assigned into two groups. In one group named MSCT+SAA group, both 64 MSCT and SAA combinative assessment were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named MSCT+CRP group, both MSCT and CRP combinative assessment were made for preoperative evaluation. Furthermore, the preoperative staging and predicted operation procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operation procedures, respectively, and the relationship between the choice of operation procedures and clinicopathologic factors was analyzed. Results All 165 patients were randomly assigned into MSCT+SAA group (n=83) and MSCT+CRP group (n=82). The baseline characteristics of two groups were statistically similar (Pgt;0.05). For MSCT+SAA group, the accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 74.7%， 68.7%, 100% and 66.3%, respectively. For MSCT+CRP group, the accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 72.0%, 86.6%, 100% and 81.7%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the accuracies of N staging and TNM staging between two groups (P＜0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures between two groups (90.4% vs. 95.1%, Pgt;0.05). The pathological T staging (P＜0.001), N staging (P＜0.001), TNM staging (P＜0.001), preoperative serum level of SAA (P=0.010), serum level of CRP (P=0.042), and distance of tumor to the dentate line (P=0.011) were associated with the operative procedures. Conclusion Combinative assessment of MSCT+CRP could improve the accuracy of preoperative staging and operative procedures prediction, which may be superior to MSCT+SAA.
Objective To determine the influence of combinative assessment of 64 multi-slice spiral computer tomography (MSCT) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA ) on the selection of operative procedures in lower rectal cancer.MethodsProspectively enrolled 130 patients diagnosed definitely as lower rectal cancer (distance of tumor to the dentate line ≤7 cm) at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from July 2007 to September 2008 were randomly assigned into two groups with 65 participants, respectively. In one group named MSCT+SAAgroup, both 64 MSCT and SAA combinative assessment were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named MSCT group, only the preoperative MSCT was made. Furthermore, the preoperative staging and predicted operation procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operation program, respectively.ResultsAccording to the criteria, 119 patients with colorectal cancer were actually included into MSCT+SAA group (n=58) and MSCT group (n=61). The baselines characteristics of two groups were basically identical. For MSCT+SAAgroup, the accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 89.66%, 79.31%, 100% and 77.59%, respectively; For MSCT group, the corresponding rates were 86.89%, 70.49%, 100% and 65.57%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures in two groups (93.10% vs. 80.33%, P=0.041). The clinical staging (P=0.001), preoperative T staging (P=0.000), M staging (P=0.016), TNM staging (P=0.013) and serum level of SAA (P=0.029) were related to the selection of operative procedures when analyzing the relationship between the operative procedures and multiple clinicopathologic factors in lower rectal cancer. ConclusionCombinative assessment of 64 MSCT and SAA could improve the accuracy of preoperative staging, thus provide higher predictive coincidence rate to operative procedures for surgeon.
Objective To determine the influence of combinative assessment of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) on the assessment of preoperative staging selection of operative procedures in the middle and lower rectal cancer. Methods Prospectively enrolled 130 patients, who diagnosed definitely as middle and lower rectal cancer at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2008 to February 2009 were randomly assigned into two groups with 65 participants, respectively. In one group named TRUS combined SAA group, both TRUS and SAA combinative assessment were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named TRUS group, only the preoperative TRUS was made. The preoperative staging and predicted operative procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operation program, respectively.Results Of 118 patients with rectal cancer were actually included into TRUS combined SAA group (n=59) and TRUS group (n=59). The baselines of characteristics of two groups were basically identical. For TRUS combined SAA group， the accuracies of preoperative T and N staging were 79.7% (47/59) and 77.8% (42/54) respectively; For TRUS group the corresponding rates were 86.4% (51/59) and 57.7% (30/52), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference of the accuracy of preoperative T staging （P=0.609） while preoperative N staging had statistical difference (P=0.027) between two groups. There was a statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures in two groups 〔96.6% (57/59) vs. 83.1% (49/59), P=0.015〕. The preoperative T staging was related to the selection of operative procedures (P=0.037) when analyzing the relationship between the operative procedures and the multiple clinicopathological factors in middle and lower rectal cancer. ConclusionCombinative assessment of TRUS and SAA could improve the accuracy of preoperative staging in middle and lower rectal cancer, thus provide higher predictive coincidence rate to operative procedures for surgeon.
Objective To determine the role of multimodal preoperative evaluation (MPE) system of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), 64 multi-slice spiral computer tomography (MSCT) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) in assessment of preoperative staging and selection of operative procedures of the lower and middle rectal cancer in multi-disciplinary team. Methods Prospectively enrolled 150 patients, who were diagnosed definitely as lower and middle rectal cancer (distance of tumor to the dentate line ≤10 cm) at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from November 2008 to March 2009, randomly assigned into two groups. In one group named MPE group, MPE consisting of TRUS, MSCT and SAA were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named MSCT+SAA group, both MSCT and SAA were made preoperatively. Then, the preoperative staging and predicted operative procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operative procedures, respectively. Furthermore, the pooled data were analyzed for the correlative relationship between the choice of surgery strategy and clinicopathological factors. Results According to the criteria, 146 patients with lower and middle rectal cancer were randomly assigned into MPE group (n=74) and MSCT+SAA group (n=72). The baselines characteristics of two groups were statistically identical. For MPE group the accuracy of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 94.6% (70/74), 85.1% (63/74), 100% （74/74） and 82.4% (61/74), respectively; For MSCT+SAA group the corresponding rates were 77.8% (56/72), 84.7% (61/72), 100% （72/72） and 81.9% (59/72), respectively. The analysis showed a statistically difference in the accuracy of preoperative T staging between two groups (P=0.003) while there was no statistically significant difference of the accuracies of preoperative N, M and TNM staging between two groups (Pgt;0.05). There wasn’t a statistically significant increasing of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures in MPE group compared with MSCT+SAA group 〔95.9% (71/74) vs.88.9% (64/72), P=0.106〕. When analyzing the relationship between multiple clinicopathologic factors and the operative procedures of lower and middle rectal cancer, there were statistical correlations between the pathological T staging (r=0.216， P=0.009), N staging (r=0.264， P=0.001), TNM staging (r=0.281， P=0.001), serum level of SAA before operation (r=0.252， P=0.002) or the distance of tumor to the dentate line (r=－0.261， P=0.001) and the operative procedures. Conclusion MPE system could display the accurate preoperative staging for lower and middle rectal cancer, on which the prediction of operative procedures can rest convincingly.
Objective To determine the influence of combinative assessment of 64 multi-slice spiral computer tomography (MSCT) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) on the selection of operative procedures of upper rectal cancer in multi-disciplinary team. Methods Prospectively enrolled 110 patients, who were diagnosed definitely as upper rectal cancer (distance of tumor to the dentate line gt;7 cm) at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from August 2007 to October 2008, randomly assigned into two groups. In one group named MSCT+SAA group, both MSCT and SAA combinative assessment were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named MSCT group, only MSCT was made preoperatively. Then, the pooled data were analyzed for the correlative relationship between the choice of surgery strategy and clinicopathologic factors. Furthermore, the preoperative staging and predicted operative procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operative procedures, respectively. Results According to the criteria, 106 patients with upper rectal cancer were randomly assigned into MSCT+SAA group (n=52) and MSCT group (n=54). The baseline characteristics of two groups were statistically identical. When analyzing the proportion of multiple clinicopathologic factors in different operative procedures of upper rectal cancer, there were statistical differences in the preoperative N staging (P=0.003), M staging (P=0.022), TNM staging (P=0.003), serum level of SAA (P=0.005) and general category of tumor (P=0.027). For MSCT+SAA group the accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 84.6%, 86.5%, 100% and 86.5%, respectively; For MSCT group the corresponding rates were 83.3%, 2.9%, 100% and 64.8%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences accuracies of preoperative N staging and TNM staging (P=0.005, P=0.009, respectively) in two groups. There was a statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures in two groups (96.2% vs. 81.5%, P=0.017). Conclusion Combinative assessment of 64 MSCT and SAA could improve the accuracy of preoperative staging, and thus provide higher predictive coincidence rate to operative procedures for surgeon.
Objective To discuss the influence of combination of 64 multi-slice spiral computer tomography (MSCT) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) for preoperative assessment on colon cancer surgery strategy. Methods Ｔhe examination data of 110 patients diagnosed definitely as colon cancer in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from Nov. 2007 to Nov. 2008 were studied prospectively, and randomly assigned into the MSCT+SAA group and MSCT group, respectively. Both MSCT and SAA combinative assessment were made for preoperative evaluation in MSCT+SAA group, while only MSCT was made preoperatively in MSCT group. Furthermore, the preoperative staging and prediction of operative procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical of operative procedures, respectively. Results According to the inclusion criteria, 99 colon cancer patients were actually included into MSCT+SAA group (n=49) and MSCT group (n=50). The baseline characteristics of two groups were statistically identical. For MSCT+SAA group, The accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 81.6%, 79.6%, 100% and 77.6%, respectively. For MSCT group, the corresponding rates were 82.0%, 60.0%, 98.0% and 62.0%, respectively. The difference of accuracies on staging N between two groups was observed statistically (χ2=4.498, P=0.034). There was also a statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction of operative procedures in MSCT+SAA group and MSCT group (95.9% vs. 82.0%, χ2=4.854, P=0.028). The preoperative staging N (P=0.008), M (P=0.010), TNM (P=0.009) and level of SAA (P=0.004) were related to the selection of operative procedures when analyzed the relationship between the operative procedures and multiple clinicopathologic factors in colon cancer. Conclusion The strategy of the combinative assessment of MSCT and SAA could advance the accuracy of preoperative staging, thus serve surgeon the more accurate prediction to surgery strategy in colon cancer.
Objective To investigate the relationship of serum amyloid A protein (SAA) and surgical choice in low locally advanced rectal cancer (LLARC). Methods Fifty-two patients with LLARC at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed. According to operative methods the patients were divided into 2 groups: curative surgery group (n=35) and palliative surgery group (n=17). Then, venous blood specimens were taken to measure preoperative serum SAA level. Results The analysis showed the option of surgical procedures was associated with preoperative SAA concentration (P=0.004) in LLARC, but irrelative with pathological characteristics and preoperative imaginologic staging (Pgt;0.05). High concentration of serum SAA (≥10.5 mg/L) significantly increased the odds of palliative surgery 〔OR=7.47, 95% CI (1.62-34.40), P＝0.010〕.Conclusion High level of SAA is a useful marker to predict the possibility of palliative surgery in LLARC, which is helpful to screen the patients for the surgical decision and adjuvant therapy.
Objective To determine the influence and significance of combinative assessment of 64 multi-slice spiral computer tomography (MSCT) with serum amyloid A protein (SAA) or fibrinogen (FIB) on the selection of operative procedures of rectal cancer under the multidisciplinary team. Methods Prospectively enrolled 240 patients diagnosed definitely as rectal cancer at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from February to June 2009 were randomly assigned into two groups. In one group named MSCT+SAA group, both MSCT and SAA combinative assessment were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named MSCT+FIB group, both MSCT and FIB combinative assessment were made for preoperative evaluation. Furthermore, the preoperative staging and predicted operation procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operation procedures, respectively, and the relationship between the choice of operation procedures and clinicopathologic factors was analyzed. Results According to the criteria, 234 patients were actually included into MSCT+SAA group (n=118) and MSCT+FIB group (n=116). The baseline characteristics of two groups were statistically similar (Pgt;0.05). For MSCT+SAA group, the accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 72.9%, 83.1%, 100% and 80.1%, respectively. For MSCT+FIB group, the accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 68.1%, 75.0%, 100% and 74.1%, respectively, and there was not a statistically significant difference (Pgt;0.05). There was also not a statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures in two groups (99.6% vs. 96.6%, Pgt;0.05). The preoperative T staging (P＜0.001), N staging (P＜0.001), TNM staging (P＜0.001), serum level of SAA (P＜0.001), serum level of FIB (Plt;0.001) and distance of tumor to the dentate line (P＜0.05) were associated to the operative procedures. Conclusions Combinative assessment of MSCT and FIB could improve the accuracy of preoperative staging and operative procedures prediction, however, it may be not superior to MSCT plus SAA.
ObjectiveTo observe the changing patterns of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) levels before and after hip replacement surgery, and explore their clinical significances. MethodsNinety-seven consecutive patients enrolled in clinical pathway in our hospital for hip replacement from April 2011 to May 2013 were included in the present study. ESR, CRP and SAA levels were investigated preoperatively and post-operatively at day 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, Month 1 and 3. All the cases were followed up, among which there were 14 cases of total hip replacement, 56 cases of cementless hemianthroplasty, and 27 cases of biotype hemianthroplasty. ResultsAll three of ESR, CRP and SAA levels were elevated post-operatively. Levels of CRP and SAA peaked at day 3 after surgery, and then subsided gradually to pre-operative levels after 1 month. ESR level peaked at day 7 postoperatively, and then subsided gradually to pre-operative levels after 3 months. There was a significant correlation between levels of CRP and levels of SAA. ConclusionCompared with ESR and SAA, CRP appears to be a faster and more sensitive parameter. Cementless hemianthroplasty is associated with changes of SAA levels but not with CRP levels. Close monitoring of evolutionary changes in ESR, SAA and CRP levels may help to diagnose and treat early infection after hip replacement surgery.