Objective To investigate the clinical curative effect of divided excision and plastic combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in treatment for circular mixed hemorrhoids. Methods Clinical observation on 120 patients with circular mixed hemorrhoids between May 2007 and May 2008 treated by divided excision and plastic combined with PPH was carried out. Results The mean hospital stay after operation was 7.6 d. The wound healing average time was 11.9 d. The incidence rate of postoperative urinary retention was 5.8% (7/120). Average scores of pain in 3 d after operation: 5.3 points (1-8 points) on day 1, 3.6 points （2-9 points） on day 2, 2.2 points （1-8 points） on day 3. All patients were followed up for 12 months, there were 3 cases of hematochezia， 1 case of prolapse, and 1 case of remained abnormal outgrowth skin; the anus function was normal in all cases without anal stricture or tightening feeling. Conclusions Divided excision and plastic combined with PPH can better treat circular mixed hemorrhoids. This operation can not only completely clear the lesions, but also repair and reconstruct the anus and anal canal, protect its size and function. It is an ideal operation for treatment for circular mixed hemorrhoids.
目的 探讨嵌顿环状混合痔的手术治疗方法。 方法 回顾性总结我院1998年1月至2002年1月采用小切口外剥内扎硬注术治疗嵌顿环状混合痔30例临床经验。 结果 30例患者手术过程顺利，手术时间平均50 min，平均住院时间10 d，术后并发肛门Ⅰ度水肿4例，术后当天排尿困难1例，经对症治疗后痊愈出院。本组病例术后随访1年均无复发。 结论 该术式能迅速减轻患者痛苦，且疗效满意。
目的:探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切吻合术(PPH术)+外痔切除和单纯外剥内扎术治疗重度环状混合痔的临床效果。方法:对收治的48例III,IV度环状混合痔患者随机分为2组,分别采用PPH术+外痔切除术和单纯外剥内扎术予以治疗的疗效进行比较。结果:通过对手术时间、术中出血、疼痛程度、住院时间、患者满意度等进行比较观察,表明PPH术+外痔切除具有明显优势。结论:PPH术+外痔切除术仍能保持单纯PPH优势,克服其不足之处,较传统外剥内扎术治疗重度环状混合痔有明显的优势。
Objective To summarize the clinical effect and the key part of operation of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） in treatment for severe mixed hemorrhoids or circular hemorrhoids. Method The data of 183 patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids or circular hemorrhoids underwent PPH in this hospital from August 2006 to November 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Results The operation time was （28.5±3.1） min. The operations were successfully completed at one-stage in all the patients. The average hospital stay was 5.2 d. No postoperative bleeding， fecal incontinence， and infection happened. No recurrence and complications such as postoperative rebleeding，anal stenosis， fecal incontinence， etc were found during 1 month to 3 years of follow-up with an average 26 months. Conclusions PPH as a minimally invasive operation， every detail of it should be well performed in order to improve the clinical treatment effect and reduce complications of the patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids or circular hemorrhoids.
目的比较外剥内扎（注射）加开窗治疗环状混合痔和传统外剥内扎法治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效。方法80例环状混合痔患者分别接受外剥内扎（注射）加开窗治疗和传统外剥内扎法治疗，对两种术式的疗效进行比较。结果2组患者术后均未发生肛门失禁症状，肛门功能的差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05），而治疗组患者肛门狭窄、肛门水肿和疼痛明显轻于对照组（Plt;0.05），尿潴留、切口愈合时间以及复发也明显少于对照组（Plt;0.05）。结论外剥内扎（注射）加开窗术是环状混合痔的较好治疗方案。
目的总结分段齿形结扎加皮桥整形术治疗环状混合痔的优、缺点。方法将我院2007年1月至2009年12月期间收治的80例环状混合痔患者按入院顺序简单随机分成2组，治疗组采用分段齿形结扎加皮桥整形术治疗，对照组采用传统的外剥内扎术，比较2组的疗效。结果治疗组治愈率为95%(38/40),对照组为90%(36/40)，2组比较差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05); 治疗组较对照组的治愈时间明显缩短(Plt;0.05)，术后疼痛、水肿、皮赘残留及肛管狭窄并发症方面更轻(Plt;0.05)。结论分段齿形结扎加皮桥整形术治疗环状混合痔比传统的外剥内扎术有更好的临床实用价值。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety of shearing fracture ligation combining procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） in treatment for mixed hemorrhoids via a multicenter clinical study. MethodsTwo hundred and fortysix patients with mixed hemorroids were included from four a level of firstclass hospitals, which were averagely divided into shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group, PPH group, and shearing fracture ligation group according to the order of admission. The occurrence status of rectovaginal fistula, urethrorectal fistula, postoperative bleeding, acute urinary retention, anorectal stenosis, and anal incontinence were observed. And the anal function was evaluated by the anorectal pressure measurement. ResultsNo rectovaginal fistula or urethrorectal fistula happened among three groups. No anorectal stenosis happened in the shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group or the PPH group. The score of anorectal stenosis and anal incontinence in these two groups were lower than those in the shearing fracture ligation group (Plt;0.05). The rate of postoperative bleeding in the shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group was lower than that in the shearing fracture ligation group (Plt;0.05). There were acute urinary retentions happened among three groups, but without significant differences among them (Pgt;0.05). The anal canal resting pressure after operation was lower than that before operation among three groups (Plt;0.01), which in the shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group was lower than that in the shearing fracture ligation group after operation (Plt;0.05). There were no significant differences of the rectum feeling capacity or maximum rectum capacity between the shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group and PPH group before and after operation (Pgt;0.05), but compared with the level before operation in the shearing fracture ligation group, the rectum feeling capacity obviously decreased after operation (Plt;0.05), the maximum rectum capacity obviously increased (Plt;0.05). There were no significant differences of the maxinum anal canal systolic blood pressure between before and after operation in three groups and among three groups (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionsThe operation of shearing fracture ligation combined with PPH can protect the tissue of rectal cushion, remain the normal anatomy structure of anal canal. It has better clinical effect and is much safer than other methods.
目的 探讨痔的病因及其分类，总结痔的诊治经验。方法 回顾性分析2005年7月至2008年9月期间在我院诊治的53例痔患者的临床资料。结果 18例Ⅱ度内痔中11例给予一般治疗，有7例便后仍有痔块脱出; 7例注射治疗均无便后痔块脱出。14例外痔均治愈，其中5例血栓性外痔均行血栓剥离术; 6例单纯结缔组织外痔中4例给予一般治疗，2例手术切除皮赘，瘙痒、潮湿症状改善; 3例单纯炎性外痔给予口服抗生素及一般治疗，疼痛症状缓解。21例Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔或混合痔术后均无痔块随排便脱出，其中16例（76.2%）发生肛门水肿，15例（71.4%）肛门疼痛短期临时应用止痛剂后缓解，共有15例（71.4%）患者获得随访，随访1～3年（平均2年），无复发，无肛门狭窄，无控便及精细控便障碍。结论 内、外痔各有其相应的病因及发病机理。应放弃用一种学说或发病机理解释所有“痔”的思维。MilliganMorgan术仍是基层医院治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔或混合痔较理想术式，但疼痛和水肿是其不足。
目的 比较改良外剥内扎术与传统外剥内扎术（Milligan-Morgan手术，MM手术）治疗混合痔的疗效。方法 我院2004年3月至2007年11月期间收治了96例混合痔患者，按抽签法随机均分成了改良外剥内扎术组（改良组）和传统外剥内扎术组（传统组）2组，对2组患者的疗效和并发症进行比较。结果 改良组42例患者治愈，6例好转； 传统组30例患者治愈，16例好转，2例未愈，2组比较差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。改良组患者术中出血量〔(15.4±2.8) ml〕少于传统组〔(25.6±3.3) ml〕，Plt;0.05； 手术时间〔(40.2±5.3) min〕也短于传统组〔(70.5±4.8) min〕，Plt;0.05。改良组患者术后疼痛轻于传统组，并发症也少于传统组，差异均有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。改良组患者住院时间〔(12.45±2.25) d〕明显短于传统组患者〔(18.69±2.72) d〕，Plt;0.05。2组患者随访20～27个月（平均2年），仅传统组1例复发。结论 改良外剥内扎术的疗效好于传统外剥内扎术。