Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of injected cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor for acute postoperative pain. Methods We electronically searched PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid and CNKI databases from 1999 through Jan. 2009 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor or parecoxib sodium for acute postoperative pain. The methodological quality of included RCTs were assessed, and the data was extracted by two reviewers independently according to the Cochrane Handbook. The homogeneous RCTs were pooled using RevMan software, and the non-homogeneous studies evaluted using descriptive qualitative analysis. Results Seven RCTs involving 1939 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of meta-analyses showed that: ① Efficacy: The comparison of PCA combined parecoxib sodium (successively injected less than 3 days) i.v. with PCA alone: after 24, 48, and 72 hours of the initial dose of parecoxib 40 mg i.v., the percentage of the patients’ global evaluation of study medication (PGESM) described effective (excellent and good) was higher than that of the control group [RR (95%CI) were 1.41 (1.13, 1.75), 1.25 (1.15, 1.35), and 1.30 (1.21, 1.40) respectively]; the percentage of the PGESM described ineffective (fair and poor) was lower than that of the control group [RR (95%CI) were 0.43 (0.26, 0.72), 0.44 (0.34, 0.57), and 0.33 (0.23, 0.48) respectively]. ② Safety: Combination of PCA with parecoxib sodium could lessen the incidence of postoperative fever (RR=0.34, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.53) and nausea and vomiting (RR=0.69, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.83), but not statistically decrease of respiratory depression (RR=0.84, 95%CI 0.38 to 1.83), pruritus (RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.52), and headache (RR=0.77, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.28). Conclusion The combination of PCA with parecoxib sodium successively injected less than 3 days can significantly increase the scores of PGESM, and does not increase the incidence of adverse effects or postoperative complications, and also has the advantage of decreasing postoperative fever, nausea and vomiting.
ObjectiveTo systemically evaluate the efficacy and safety of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) signal pathway inhibition in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsA systematic literature search in PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, ASCO databases, CNKI and Wanfang database was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the time of database establishment to June 2015. RCTs of COX-2 inhibitors treating advanced NSCLC were included. We assessed the methodology quality of the included studies by using Jadad's scale, and performed this meta-analysis by using stata12.0 software. ResultsTwelve RCTs involving three different COX-2 inhibitors with a total of 1 828 patients were identified including 8 studies of high quality and 4 studies of low quality. We found that COX-2 signal pathway inhibition could significantly increase overall response rate at RR=1.27 with 95%CI1.10 to 1.46 (P=0.001). While our present data could not confirm the efficacy of COX-2 inhibitors in improving progression-free survival (PFS) at HR=0.93 with 95%CI0.81 to 1.08 (P=0.334), overall survival (OS) at HR=0.95 with 95%CI0.84 to 1.08 (P=0.461), or one-year survival rate at RR=1.08 with 95%CI0.90 to 1.24 (P=0.29). As for toxicities, only increased risk of thrombocytopenia at RR=1.28 with 95%CI 1.03 to 1.85 (P=0.03) was observed in the patients treated with COX-2 inhibitors. ConclusionCOX-2 signal pathway inhibition is effective in improving the overall response rate of the patients with advanced NSCLC, and is well tolerated. Whether COX-2 signal pathway inhibition is effective in improving long-term survival of the patients with advanced NSCLC still needs to be confirmed via further clinical trials.