west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "留置导尿" 5 results
  • 舒泰润滑尿道对留置导尿患者术后舒适度的影响

    【摘要】 目的 探讨全身麻醉后导尿时使用舒泰润滑尿道对患者术后舒适度的影响。 方法 2010年2-3月将择期手术的普通外科患者60例,随机分为观察组、对照组各30例。两组均在全身麻醉后进行导尿,观察组插入导尿管前使用舒泰对尿道进行充分的润滑,然后按常规置入尿管;对照组按常规导尿,并对两组患者术后麻醉苏醒24 h内的导尿舒适度进行观察比较。 结果 对照组患者术后尿道疼痛程度、尿道不适症状明显高于观察组(Plt;0.05)。 结论 全身麻醉后在导尿时使用舒泰可减轻患者术后尿道的疼痛和尿道不适症状,减少患者的痛苦,提高护理质量。

    Release date:2016-08-26 02:18 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 留置导尿管相关性尿路感染目标监测结果与分析

    目的 了解留置导尿管相关性尿路感染发生率,为制定预防控制措施提供参考依据。 方法 2012年3月-8月在神经内科、神经外科、老年内科、泌尿外科对留置导尿管的患者进行医院感染目标性监测。 结果 导尿管相关尿路感染发病率为6.46%,感染率最高的科室为老年内科13.95%,其次为神经外科12.96%和泌尿外科3.59%。神经内科导尿管0.00%。 结论 针对监测结果,采取适当的干预措施,可有效降低留置导尿管相关性感染的发生率。

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Analysis of the Causes and Nursing Strategy of Indwelling Urethral Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Intensive Care Unit

    ObjectiveTo analyze the related risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and make corresponding nursing countermeasures. MethodsBy target monitoring of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in 184 patients in the ICU from 2011 to 2012, infection risk factors were analyzed. The measures of nursing interventions had been taken since January 2012, and the effects before and after the intervention were contrasted and evaluated. ResultsBefore the intervention, 951 out of 1 229 patients in 2011 had indwelling catheter, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection occurred in 127 patients with an infection rate of 13.35%. After the intervention, 841 out of 1 437 in 2012 had indwelling catheter, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection occurred in 57 patients with an infection rate of 6.78%. ConclusionTaking effective intervention measures can effectively reduce the ICU catheter-associated urinary tract infection and it also ensures the safety of medical care.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Perioperative Painless Indwelling Urethral Catheter in Lobectomy of Lung Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

    Objective To evaluate the advantages of perioperative painless indwelling urethral catheters in lobectomy of lung cancer. Methods We recruited 133 patients who were scheduled for lung cancer lobectomy under general anesthesia in Department of Thoracic Surgery in West China Hospital from April through December 2014. These patients were divided into two groups including a control group (68 patients) and a trial group (65 patients). The trial group was painless indwelled urethral catheter, and the control group was indwelled urethral catheter routinely. The clinical effectiveness between the two groups was compared. Results The rates of emergence agitation (EA) occurrence and urinary tract infection in the trial group (10.77%, 9.23%) were reduced than those in the control group (26.47%, 26.47%) with statistical differences (P=0.022, P=0.047). And the rate of comfort level (0 degree) of the patients in the trial group (87.69%) was significantly increased than that in the control group (48.53%, P=0.001). And postoperative hospitalization duration in the trial group (5.00±1.60 d) was shorter than that in the control group (6.48±3.14 d, P=0.004). Conclusion Perioperative painless indwelling urethral catheters in lobectomy of lung cancer has benefit of improving the comfort level of the patients and promoting fast-track rehabilitation in the patients with lung cancer.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Timing of indwelling urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia: a prospective controlled study

    Objective To explore the timing of indwelling urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia by a prospective randomized controlled study. Methods Male patients who underwent orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia in the First People’s Hospital of Shuangliu District between September 2019 and January 2021 were selected prospectively. The patients were randomly assigned to group A (pull out the catheter before anesthesia) and group B (pull out the catheter within 24 hours after anesthesia) at a ratio of 1∶1 by sortition. The age, operation duration, operation site, heart rate when pulling out the catheter, first urination, urinary tract infection, patient comfort score, nursing satisfaction score and patient satisfaction related indicators of the two groups were recorded and analyzed. Results A total of 120 patients were included in the study. All patients successfully completed the trial without dropping out or quitting. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, operation duration and operation site (P>0.05). No urinary tract infection occurred in both groups. There was no significant difference in the first urination between the two groups (P>0.05). The heart rate of patients in group A when pulling out the catheter was slower than that of group B [(74.62 ± 11.38) vs. (84.52 ± 8.98) times/min], and the satisfaction of patients in group A (group A: 46 cases were satisfied, 11 cases were relatively satisfied, 3 cases were dissatisfied; group B: 17 cases were satisfied, 25 cases were relatively satisfied, 18 cases were dissatisfied), comfort score (17.82±2.73 vs. 16.68±2.13), and nursing satisfaction score (19.62±1.59 vs. 16.32±2.05) were better than those in group B (P<0.05). Conclusions For male patients who need catheterization before orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia, pulling out the catheter before waking up after anesthesia can effectively reduce the physiological stress reaction of patients, reduce discomfort, improve patient satisfaction, and reduce the workload of nurses after surgery, which is conducive to early rehabilitation exercise of patients.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content