【摘要】 目的 评价抚触对硬膜外麻醉穿刺疼痛的影响及效果。 方法 2009年1-12月，将485例行硬膜外麻醉穿刺患者随机分为抚触组（术中行抚触干预）和对照组（常规护理），观察两组患者的穿刺程度、穿刺时间。 结果 抚触组患者疼痛程度、穿刺时间较对照组有明显改善，且差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.01）。 结论 抚触可降低应激引起的硬膜外麻醉穿刺患者的疼痛程度，保持穿刺体位从而缩短穿刺时间，有利于麻醉操作顺利进行。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effect of touching on alleviating the pain in patients undergoing epidural anesthesia puncture. Methods A total of 485 patients who underwent epidural puncture from January to December 2009 were randomly divided into two groups: 259 in touching group and 226 in control group. In the touching group, the patients were touched and consoled while undergoing epidural puncture. The pain extent and time of puncture were observed and recorded. Results The level of pain and time of puncture were obviously alleviated and shortened in the touching group and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Conclusion Touching could reduce the stress and pain caused by epidural puncture, which may lead to maintain the puncture position and thereby shorten the puncture time. It helps to finish the narcotic operation favorably.
目的 评价硬膜外麻醉合用丙泊酚用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性。方法 择期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者850例，经T 9～10椎间隙行硬脊膜外腔穿刺置管，给予常规剂量的2%利多卡因或0.75%布比卡因，气腹前静脉注射丙泊酚1～2 mg/kg,直至患者意识消失，继以10 mg/(kg·h)维持麻醉深度。结果 全组850例患者术中麻醉效果好，腹肌松弛，意识消失后避免了气腹引起的牵扯反射，停止使用丙泊酚10 min左右时间，大部分患者即恢复呼唤反应。 结论 硬膜外麻醉合用丙泊酚用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种效果很好的临床麻醉方法。
Objective To evaluate the influence of combined general and epidural anesthesia on the prognosis of patients undergoing cancer surgery. Methods Such database as PubMed, OVID, EBSCO, The Cochrane Library and CNKI were searched, and other relevant journals and references of the included literature were also hand searched from 1986 to 2011. Two evaluators independently screened the studies in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data and assessed the methodology quality. RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results Seven studies involving 2 513 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with the single general anesthesia, the combined general and epidural anesthesia had no significant differences in postoperative recurrence and metastasis rate (OR=0.71, 95%CI 0.44 to 1.17, P=0.18). Based on the following four factors i.e. category of cancer, time of follow-up, having preoperative metastais or not, and patients’ age, the sensitivity analysis showed significant differences in the postoperative recurrence and metastasis rate between the two anesthesia methods were found in the group of patients at or above 64 years old and the group with follow-up equal to or less than two years (OR=1.46, 95%CI 1.00 to 2.14, P=0.05; OR=1.55, 95%CI 1.06 to 2.26, P=0.02; respectively). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the groups of patients with colorectal cancer or without preoperative metastasis (OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.62-1.61, P=0.99; OR=1.26, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.86, P=0.23; respectively). Conclusion Compared with single general anesthesia, the combined general and epidural anesthesia cannot reduce the recurrence and metastasis rate for cancer patients, and has no marked improvement in prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer or without preoperative metastasis, but it obviously decreases the probability of forward recurrence and metastasis for the patients at or above 64 years old and the patients with follow-up equal to or less than two years.
至2002年4月,分娩期会阴保护的证据如下: ①合成的可吸收材料在分娩期外阴1、2度撕伤修补和外阴切开中的应用(可以减少疼痛时间):1个系统评价发现,使用合成的可吸收缝合线相对于普通肠线明显减少了分娩后10天内镇痛药的使用剂量.对于分娩期的疼痛和分娩3个月后的性交痛,合成的可吸收材料与普通肠线无显著差别.系统评价中的一个大规模RCT发现,合成的可吸收材料在分娩后12个月显著降低性交痛. ②皮下连续缝合材料在外阴1、2度撕伤修补和外阴切开中的应用(减少疼痛时间):1个系统评价发现,皮下连续缝合相对间断缝合明显减轻了分娩后10天以内的疼痛.③分娩期对病人持续的支持(减少助产器械的使用):1个系统评价发现,分娩期对产妇持续的支持(注释:分娩过程中有护士、助产士等专业人士陪伴,并提供咨询)明显减少了助产器械的使用及会阴切开,但不能防止分娩期损伤的发生.④各种方法和材料在3、4度撕伤修补中的应用: 我们没有找到评论外阴3、4度撕伤修补最好的材料和方法的RCT.⑤硬膜外麻醉(增加了助产的机率,从而增加了会阴损伤的机率):1个系统评价没有找到直接的证据来比较硬膜外麻醉和其他麻醉对会阴损伤的影响.但是,一些RCT发现,仅在第一产程使用硬膜外麻醉和在第一产程及二、三产程都使用硬膜外麻醉相比,后者的器械助产及会阴损伤风险显著升高.⑥不协助孕妇分娩和协助分娩的比较( 增加了孕妇疼痛,无证据显示会阴损伤风险及会阴切开机率减少):1个RCT发现,不协助孕妇分娩(不接触胎儿头部或者保护产妇会阴)与协助产妇分娩(分娩期在胎头上施压及保护产妇会阴)相比,显著增加了产后10天的疼痛但却减少了会阴切开的机率.但无证据显示前者增加了会阴损伤风险或3、4度外阴撕伤风险.⑦会阴正中切开(相比会阴侧切增加了3、4度会阴撕伤机率):无证据显示会阴正中切开能比会阴侧切减少会阴疼痛或者伤口裂开的机率.一项来自半随机试验的有限证据表明,会阴正中切开可能增加3、4度会阴撕伤的机率.⑧会阴2度撕伤及会阴切开后不缝合会阴肌肉: 1个小样本RCT发现,在皮肤烧灼感和痛觉上,缝合与不缝合肌肉在产后2～3天,愈合后2～3天或产后8周没有差别.⑨会阴1、2度撕伤和切开后不缝合会阴皮肤(减少了性交痛): 1个大样本RCT发现,不缝合皮肤与常规缝合相比,产后10天疼痛没有显著差异,但却显著减少了分娩3个月后的性交痛.⑩第二产程胎头被动下降: 1个RCT比较了胎头被动下降和主动推动胎头快速下降,结果发现二者对会阴损伤没有差别.(11)限制性的会阴切开 (减少了后壁的损伤): 1个系统评价发现,对有胎儿或母亲指征的产妇限制性使用会阴切开能显著减少会阴后壁的撕伤,但却增加了阴道前壁及阴唇的损伤风险.(12)持续性的屏气向下用力:1篇来自2个质量不高的临床对照试验的系统评价发现,第二产程向下用力时,屏气与不屏气对会阴撕伤的发生率及程度没有影响.1篇RCT比较胎头被动下降与屏气用力推动胎头下降,二者对会阴撕伤率也没有影响.(13)分娩期体位:1个系统评价比较了直立位、仰卧位和侧卧位,结果发现分娩期直立位显著降低了会阴切开机率,却明显增加了会阴2度撕伤的风险.(14)胎头吸引(相比产钳减少了会阴损伤,但增加了新生儿脑出血风险):1个系统评价发现,胎头吸引器与产钳相比,显著降低了会阴损伤机率,但增加了新生儿脑出血和视网膜出血的风险.
Objective To explore anesthetic quality of epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer. Methods One hundred and seventy-eight patients who were diagnosed as rectal cancer and received operation in the Central Hospital of Bazhong City from June 2010 to June 2012 were included retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups according to the type of anesthesia， and the patients who received general anesthesia only were defined as group A， the patients who received epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia were defined as group B. The anesthetic quality and anesthetic adverse reaction were observed in two groups. Results The differences of baseline characteristics in two groups were not significant （P＞0.05）. The difference of anesthetic quality in two groups was not significant （P＞0.05）. In terms of anesthetic adverse reaction， the incidence rate of hypertension， hypotension，tachycardia， or postoperative nausea and vomiting of the group B was significantly lower than those of the group A （P＜0.05）. The incidence rate of bradycardia， premature ventricular contractions， or time of gastrointestinal function recovery had no significant differences （P＞0.05）. There was no nerve dysfunction of lower limb in two groups. Conclusion Epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer as compared with general anesthesia only not only has the same anesthetic quality， but also has obvious advantages in decreasing anesthetic adverse reaction.
Objective To investigate the most suitable anaesthesia method for the tension-free herniorrhaphy.Methods A total of 422 unilateral inguinal hernia cases from 2002 to 2005 were collected and randomly divided into the local anaesthesia group and epidural anaesthesia group. Observation indices and some relative data, such as operative duration, date of ambulation, date of foodintake, length of hospital stay, operation-correlated complications, anaesthesia complications, usage rate of ancillary drug, satisfactory rate for anesthesia, cost of hospitalization, were included and recorded in the questionnaire, and all the patients who took the tension-free herniorrhaphy were asked to answer it as the follow-up research. Results It was found that the occurrence of postoperative anaesthetic complications, the cost of hospitalization, length of stay of local anaesthesia group were significantly less than those of epidural anaesthesia group, and the date of moving and the date of foodintake were also significantly earlier than those of the other group (P＜0.05). However, there was no significant difference of operative duration, postoperative recovery situation and the satisfactory rate between two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion The local anaesthesia is suitable for most of the tension-free herniorrhaphy, and it may be used as the conventional anaesthetic method.
Objective To observe the effects of epidural anaesthesia (EA) and general anaesthesia (GA) on the changes of plasma epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods Thirty patients undergoing elective LC were randomly divided into GA group (n＝15) and EA group (n＝15). The concentrations of plasma NE and E were measured at the following phases: before anaesthesia, before introducing pneumoperitoneum, during pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of operation. Results In EA group, the concentrations of NE weren′t significantly different at each phase, the concentrations of E significantly increased before and during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05) and returned to the baseline at the end of operation (Ｐ＞0.05). In GA group, the concentrations of NE and E didn′t change significantly before pneumoperitoneum, but increased during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05) and E didn′t return to the baseline at the end of operation (Ｐ＜0.05). The E concentrations of EA group was higher than that of GA group before pneumoperitoneum, but the NE concentration of EA group was lower than that of GA group during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05). Conclusion Both groups has significant stress reaction, but the stress reaction of EA group is weaker than that of GA group during LC.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the arthroscopic treatment effectiveness of popliteal cyst excision in combination with debridement of the knee under local anesthesia by comparing with continuous epidural anesthesia. MethodsBetween June 2002 and January 2013,145 patients with popliteal cyst underwent arthroscopic popliteal cyst excision in combination with debridement of the knee under local anesthesia (local anesthesia group).In addition,51 patients with popliteal cyst were treated with the same surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia between February 2000 and August 2005 served as control group.No significant difference was found in gender,age,side,disease duration,or cyst size between 2 groups (P>0.05).Then,anesthesia time,analgesia effect,anesthesia satisfaction,operation time,bleeding volume,and anesthesia complication were compared between 2 groups.The guidelines of Rauschning and Lindgren were used to assess the effectiveness,and recurrence rate was recorded. ResultsAll incisions healed primarily,no neurological or vascular injury was found.The patients were followed up 1 year and 1 month to 8 years (mean,3.7 years) in local anesthesia group,and 8 years to 13 years and 7 months (mean,10.8 years) in control group.Local anesthesia group had shorter anesthesia time,higher visual analogue scale (VAS) score,shorter operation time,and lower bleeding volume (P<0.05) than control group.Anesthesia satisfaction was reduced in local anesthesia group,but there was no significant difference (χ2=0.071,P=1.000).The anesthesia complication incidence of control group (15.7%,8/51) was significantly higher than that of local anesthesia group (0) (P=0.000).Recurrence was found in 12 patients of local anesthesia group (curative ratio 91.7%) and in 5 patients of control group (curative ratio 90.2%),showing no significant difference (χ2=0.111,P=0.774).According to the guidelines of Rauschning and Lindgren,there were 131 cases of grade 0,13 cases of grade I,and 1 case of grade Ⅱ in local anesthesia group,and 37 cases of grade 0,12 cases of grade I,and 2 cases of grade Ⅱ in control group; significant differences in grading were shown between at pre- and post-operation in 2 groups (Z=-10.683,P=0.000; Z=-6.385,P=0.000),and between 2 groups at post-operation (Z=-3.145,P=0.002). ConclusionCompared with under continuous epidural anesthesia,arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst excision under local anesthesia can obtain better results.Under local anesthesia,the condition of nerve and vessel can be timely and dynamically observed.Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst excision in combination with debridement of the knee has the advantages of less trauma,lower recurrence rate,and satisfactory results.
Objective To compare the effects of epidural anesthesia with intubated anesthesia in the postoperative recovery of patients with thoracoscopic resection of lung bullae. Methods Sixty patients (53 males, 7 females, aged 16-65 years) undergoing thoracoscopic resection of unilateral pulmonary bullae in our hospital from December 2014 to December 2015 were randomly divided into two groups: a group A (epidural anesthesia group) received thoracic epidural block combined with intraoperative interthoracic vagus nerve block; a group B (general anesthesia group) received general anesthesia with double lumen endobronchial intubation and pulmonary sequestration. Postoperative anesthesia-related complications and postoperative recovery were recorded. Results Both of the two anesthesia methods could meet the requirements of operation. The patients with the vocal cord injury and sore throat in the group B were more than those in the group A. The difference was statistically significant in the incidence of sore throat (P<0.01) . Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) in the group A was significantly higher than that of group B before lung recruitment (P<0.01). Compared with the group B, the group A had less visual analogue scale (VAS) score (P<0.05), earlier activity and feeding, less postoperative ICU and hospital stay (P<0.01). Conclusion Epidural anesthesia combined with intraoperative interthoracic vagus nerve block can meet thoracoscopic bullectomy surgery requirements with few complications and fast postoperative recovery.