Objective To systematically evaluate effectiveness and safety of nerve block therapy for neck pain. Methods Databases including CENTRAL, PubMed, Ovid, ISI, EBSCO, CBM and CNKI were searched from the date of their establishment to November 2011, and relevant references were also retrieved manually to collect both domestic and abroad randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about nerve block therapy for neck pain. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then the meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 10 studies involving 625 participants were included. The results of qualitative analysis showed that: a) The short-term effectiveness of the nerve block therapy group was markedly superior to the placebo group, the cognitive therapy group and the transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) group; and b) The short-term effectiveness of the combined nerve block therapy was markedly superior to the single nerve block therapy. The results of meta-analysis demonstrated that: a) There was no significant difference between the greater occipital nerve (GON) block group and the C2/3 nerve block group in neither short-term (SMD=−0.13, 95%CI −0.58 to 0.32, P=0.58) nor medium-term effectiveness (SMD=−0.01, 95%CI −0.46 to 0.44, P=0.98); and b): There was no significant difference between the injection with steroids group and the injection without steroids group in both short-term (SMD=0.16, 95%CI −0.13 to 0.44, P=0.28) and long-term effectiveness (SMD=0.27, 95%CI −0.02 to 0.55, P=0.07). Conclusion Current evidence shows nerve block therapy for neck pain is safe and especially good in short-term effectiveness. The combined nerve block therapy is probably more effective, but the effectiveness is not obviously improved by injection with or without steroids, and by different block methods. Due to the limitation of quality, quantity and total sample size of the included studies, this conclusion still needs to be proved by conducting more high quality and large scale studies.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of nerve-stimulator-guide needle placement in the peripheral nerve blockade. Methods The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, OVID, VIP, CNKI and CBM were searched. The quality of the included studies was evaluated by three reviewers, and meta-analysis was performed. Results Twenty studies involving 1 287 participants related to needle placement in the peripheral nerve blockade were included. There were only 2 studies that described a detailed randomization method and allocation concealment and blinding, and the others were inadequate. Meta-analysis based on the included studies showed that: ① Absolute success ratio: nerve-stimulator-guide was higher than eliciting paraesthesia (OR= 4.05, 95%CI 2.57 to 6.36, Plt;0.00001) and anatomy localization (OR=30.3, 95%CI 1.73 to 532.74, P=0.02), but lower than ultrasound-guide-localization (OR=0.27, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.74, P=0.01). ② Onset time of the block: nerve-stimulator-guide was similar to eliciting paraesthesia (WMD= –1.70, 95%CI –?4.50 to 0.95, P=0.08), faster than arteriopalmus localization (WMD= 8.38, 95%CI 0.72 to 16.04, Plt;0.000 01), but slower than ultrasound-guide-localization (WMD= 8.38, 95%CI 0.72 to 16.04, P=0.04). ③ Ratio of complication associated to block: nerve-stimulator-guide was similar to eliciting paraesthesia (OR= 1.01, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.86, P=0.97), anatomy localization (WMD= 0.06, 95%CI 0.00 to 1.21, P=0.07) and arteriopalmus localization (WMD= 8.82, 95%CI 0.10 to 4.11, P=0.65), but higher than ultrasound-guide-localization (OR= 5.03, 95%CI 1.74 to 14.49, P=0.003). ④ Time to block: nerve-stimulator-guide was similar to eliciting paraesthesia (WMD=0.02, 95%CI –0.46 to 0.51, P=0.92), shorter than arteriopalmus localization (WMD= –4.00, 95%CI –5.58 to –2.42, Plt;0.000 01) and longer than ultrasound-guide-localization (WMD= 1.90, 95%CI 0.47 to 3.33, P=0.009). ⑤ Patient-accepted ratio: nerve-stimulator-guide was higher than eliciting paraesthesia (OR=2.32, 95%CI 1.02 to 5.30, P=0.05), and similar to arteriopalmus localization (OR=8.14, 95%CI 0.88 to 75.48, P=0.06). Conclusion Nerve-stimulator-guide location is a precise, effective and safe localization method. Due to moderate risk of selection bias and detection bias of included studies, the evidence is not b. Our results suggest that well-designed double-blind randomized controlled and larger-scale trials on the use of nerve stimulator in the peripheral nerve block are needed.
Objective To compare the anesthetic effects of traditional digital block with single-injection digital block in digital injury patients for subcutaneous digital blocks. Methods Patients with one or two digits injured were randomized to the traditional digital block group and single-injection digital block group. All of the blocks were conducted by one investigator. The patients and outcome assessor were blinded to the treatment allocation. Both of the per-protocol-population (PP) analysis and the intention-to-treatment (ITT) analysis were performed to compare the two block techniques in terms of the pain during infiltration, the onset time of anesthesia and the failure rate of anesthesia. Results A total of 93 patients (109 digits) were included with 51 (61 digits) in the traditional block group and 42 (48 digits) in the single-injection block group.Two patients (3 digits) dropped out. Both of the PP analysis and ITT analysis showed that no significant difference between the two groups were detected in terms of the pain during infiltration, the onset time of anesthesia and the failure rate of anesthesia (P﹥0.05). Conclusions The subcutaneous single-injection digital block is as effective as the traditional digital block, but is much easier to perform. This technique is indicated for the digital anesthesia of palmar aspect distal to the proximal digital crease and dorsal aspect of the distal and middle phalanxes.
【摘要】 目的 观察密集型银质针松解术结合臂丛神经阻滞麻醉治疗老年肩周炎的疗效。 方法 2007年4月-2008年6月，将120例老年肩周炎患者（gt;60岁）随机分为治疗组、对照组各60例；治疗组采用密集型银质针松解术结合臂丛神经阻滞麻醉治疗，对照组则用单纯密集型银质针松解术治疗。 结果 治疗组痊愈43例、显效15例、好转2例；对照组痊愈41例、显效16例、好转3例。总有效率均为100%。两组疗效差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05），治疗组心率血压变化值及疼痛评分均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。 结论 密集型银质针松解术结合臂丛神经阻滞为治疗老年肩周炎的安全、有效方法。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of dense silver needle acupuncture therapy combined with brachial plexus nerve block for old patients with shoulder periarthritis. Methods A total of 120 patients with shoulder periarthritis diagnosed in our hospital between April 2007 and June 2008 were randomly divided into treatment group and control group with 60 in each group. Patients in the treatment group were treated with dense silver needle acupuncture therapy combined with brachial plexus nerve block, while patients in the control group were only treated with dense silver needle acupuncture therapy. Results In the treatment group, 43 patients were cured, the treatment produced effect in 15 patients, and improvement could be found in two patients. For the control group, those three numbers were respectively 41, 16 and 3. The effectice rate was 100% in both groups. The difference of effect between the two groups was not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05), while the variation of blood pressure and heart rate and the visual analogue scales in the treatment group were significant lower than these in the control gvroup (Plt;0.05) Conclusion The dense silver needle acupuncture therapy combined with brachial plexus nerve block is safe and effective in treating old patients with shoulder periarthritis.
【摘要】 目的 比较单次股神经阻滞和关节腔内单次注射罗哌卡因对膝关节镜检术后镇痛效果，为临床应用提供试验依据。 方法 2009年1月-2010年7月，选择美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）Ⅰ～Ⅱ级、年龄18~65岁、拟行择期单侧下肢膝关节镜手术患者180例，随机分为股神经阻滞组和关节腔内用药组，每组90例，分别于术前1 h行股神经阻滞（0.15%罗哌卡因20 mL）和手术结束时在膝关节腔内注入0.6%罗哌卡因20 mL。于术后4、8、24 h采用视觉模拟评分法（visual analog scale，VAS）行静止和运动时疼痛评分，记录术后患者满意度、不良反应发生率，术后使用镇痛药物情况。 结果 关节腔内用药组术后镇痛药物使用率（41.11%）明显高于股神经阻滞组（20.00%）（Plt;0.005）。两组患者术后24 h静止时及术后8、24 h运动时的VAS评分关节腔内用药组均明显高于股神经阻滞组（Plt;0.001），其余各时点差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。 结论 股神经阻滞可提供更加有效的术后镇痛效果，并且用药量小，安全系数高，值得临床推广。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the effect of single-injection femoral nerve block and local anesthetic intraarticular injection for analgesia after knee arthroscopy, in order to provide the experimental base for clinical application. Methods From January 2009 to July 2010, 180 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II patients, aged from 18 to 65 years old, and scheduled for elective single knee arthroscopy were randomly divided into two groups: femoral nerve block group and local anesthetic intraarticular injection group with 90 patients in each group. For the patients in the former group, 20 mL of 0.15% ropivacaine was injected 1 hour before operation. For the latter group, 20 mL of 0.6% ropivacaine was injected into the articular cavity after operation. Pain intension scores at rest and in motion were measured 4, 8, and 24 hours after operation by visual analog scale (VAS). The degree of patients’ satisfaction, adverse reaction incidence rate and information of taking pain-killers were also recorded. Results The rate of using pain-killers in the intraarticular injection group (41.11%) was dramatically higher than the femoral nerve block group (20.00%) (Plt;0.005). The VAS scores of patients in the intraarticular injection group at rest 24 hours after operation and in motion 8 hours and 24 hours after operation were significantly higher than the femoral nerve block group (Plt;0.001), while there was no significant difference at other points between the two groups. Conclusions Femoral nerve block is more efficient for analgesia after knee arthroscopy compared with local anesthetic intraarticular injection. It is a safe procedure requiring only a relatively small dose of medicine, and is worth being popularized.
目的:观察相同剂量不同浓度的罗哌卡因用于腰丛坐骨神经联合阻滞的临床效果。方法:择期行单侧下肢手术的患者90例,年龄18~65岁,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,随机分为3组(n=30):A组给予0.3 ％的罗哌卡因腰丛36 mL、坐骨神经24 mL,B组给予0.36 ％的罗哌卡因腰丛30 mL、坐骨神经24 mL,C组给予0.4％罗哌卡因腰丛27 mL、坐骨神经18 mL。分别于给药后2、5、10、15、20、25、30、35 min测定下肢的感觉、运动评分以及感觉阻滞的时间和运动阻滞的时间。结果:三组患者阻滞起效时间无明显差别,高容量组完全阻滞的持续时间短于低容量组;高容量低浓度组患者完全阻滞率高于低容量组,但达到完全阻滞时间长于低容量组。结论:在剂量相同时罗哌卡因的浓度和容量会影响腰丛和坐骨神经的阻滞 效果;高容量罗哌卡因更有利于达到良好的感觉阻滞。
目的:观察在经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术中采用闭孔神经阻滞减少闭孔反射的情况及远期疗效。方法:选取2005年1月～2006年5月期间我科收治的60例确诊膀胱肿瘤患者,严格按照手术适应症随机分为两组:对照组30例单纯硬膜外麻下行经尿道肿瘤电切术,治疗组30例在硬膜外麻醉基础上进行闭孔神经阻滞,观察两组闭孔反射发生率并进行术后随访,观察肿瘤的复发情况。结果:对照组闭孔反射发生率明显高于治疗组(Plt;0.05),经过随访治疗组30例患者3例出现了膀胱肿瘤复发,复发率为10.0%,对照组复发率为13.3%(4/30),两组复发率无明显差异(Pgt;0.05)。结论:在经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术中采取闭孔神经阻滞能明显减少闭孔反射的发生,明显提高手术的效果,但是改善膀胱肿瘤近期和远期疗效还有待进一步探讨。
目的 探讨改良区域神经阻滞麻醉在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的优势和应用价值。方法 回顾性总结和分析2008年2月至2010年3月期间张掖医学高等专科学校附属医院运用改良区域神经阻滞麻醉行腹股沟疝无张力修补59例患者的临床资料。结果 59例患者按照神经阻滞麻醉效果分级标准，Ⅰ级52例，Ⅱ级6例， Ⅲ级1例。7例Ⅱ、Ⅲ级患者在分离腹膜前间隙内侧时自诉疼痛，经静脉给予杜非合剂2 ml后完成手术，但均未更改麻醉方式。术后无皮疹、皮下硬结、精索水肿、阴囊血肿、尿潴留、切口感染等并发症发生。结论 改良区域神经阻滞麻醉下行腹股沟疝无张力修补术效果好、安全性高、操作简单、费用低。
Objective To study the neural mechanism of hypotension or shock state in acute cholangitis in severe type (ACST) and its value of clinical application. Methods A technique of blocking abdominal splanchnic nervi via right adipose capsule of kidney was carried out on 28 patients by injecting 1% lidocaine before urgent operation. Results After blocking the relevant nervi, hypotension or shock state in 23 patients were improved significantly (Ｐ＜0.05). The death rate was lower (14.3%) after having performed biliary decompressions with laparotomy. Conclusion Patients′ hypotension or shock state at the early phase of ACST is the result of neural reflex in which the splanchnic nervi is its afferent pathway. Blocking the relevant nervi before urgent operation, the valuable opportunity of emergency treatment can be obtainded and the complication and death rate are reduced significantly.
ObjectiveTo compare postoperative analgesic efficacy and motor function recovery between ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) and Femoral nerve block (FNB) in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsFrom March to April 2014, 40 patients chosen to receive TKA under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to FNB group and ACB group with 20 in each group. Opioids consumption during and after operation, pain score in rest and movement, the force of quadriceps femoris, activity of knee and complications after surgery were recorded. ResultsNo differences were found in opioids consumption during and after operation, pain score in rest and movement after operation. Patients of ACB group were superior to those of FNB group in motor function recovery. At hour 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 after operation, the force of quadriceps femoris was higher in patients of ACB group than those of FNB group (P<0.05). Activity of knee was higher in patients of ACB group than those of FNB group postoperatively. ConclusionACB and FNB have equal postoperative analgesic effect for TKA patients. But ACB has less influence on the force of quadriceps femoris than FNB. Therefore, patients of ACB group are superior to those of FNB group in motor function recovery, showing better activity of knee and early time of first straight leg raising.