west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "程艳" 4 results
  • 医护人员洗手现状和管理对策

    【摘要】目的 了解临床医护人员洗手依从性的现状,识别影响医护人员洗手依从性的因素,探讨防范措施。方法 通过对医护人员3种洗手方法效果的比较以及对医护人员洗手率、洗手合格率、洗手后容易再污染的原因进行分析和讨论。结果 临床医护人员洗手率低、洗手合格率低;洗手后再污染的来源主要是来自擦手毛巾和手拧式水龙头;通过对医护人员3种洗手方法效果的比较,使用快速手消毒液快速、方便、省时,能大大地提高医护人员的洗手依从性。结论 应提高医护人员对洗手重要性的再认识,有针对性改善病房内洗手条件,提高医护人员对快速手消毒液的接受度,从而真正有效地提高医护人员的洗手依从性。

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:31 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 发生于肺腺癌患者的节段状视网膜动脉周围炎一例

    Release date:2016-09-02 05:22 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 532 nm激光光凝联合复方樟柳碱治疗重度非增生型糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效观察

    Release date:2017-09-19 03:09 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Imaging and biomechanics researches of reconstructing lumbosacral stability after L5 vertebrectomy via anterolateral approach

    Objective To investigate the feasibility of anterolateral approach for L5 vertebral resection, bone grafting, and screw rod fixation by imaging and biomechanics researches. Methods Twenty formalized adult cadavers (12 males and 8 females) were randomly divided into 2 groups; L5 vertebral resection, bone graft, and screw rod fixation was performed on 10 specimens by using anterolateral approach (experimental group), and on the other 10 specimens by combined anterior and posterior approach. CT scanning and three-dimensional reconstruction were performed in the experimental group; preoperative maximal safe entry angle and depth of screws and intraoperative actual entry angle and depth of screws were measured; the sacral screw position was observed after operation. The biomechanical test was done in 2 groups. Results Twenty specimens smoothly underwent L5 excision and reconstruction. CT scan showed that there was no significant difference in maximal safe entry angle and depth of screws between males and females in experimental group before operation (P>0.05); the maximal safe entry angle and depth were 51.93° and 47.88 mm for anterior screw, and were 37.04° and 46.28 mm for posterior screw. After operation, depth of the sacral anterior and posterior screws were appropriate, which did not pierce into the spinal canal. The biomechanical test results indicated that the flexion, extension, and lateral flexion displacements, and vertical compression stiffness showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For L5 lesions not invading posterior column, to use L5 vertebral resection, bone graft, and screw rod fixation by anterolateral approach is a safe and feasible method to reconstruct lumbosacral stability, with the advantages of no changing posture, less operation time and incision, and prevention of bone graft shift, but effectiveness need further be identified.

    Release date:2017-03-13 01:37 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content