目的总结巨大纵隔肿瘤的外科治疗方法。 方法回顾性分析我院胸外科2008年10月至2013年10月18例巨大纵隔肿瘤患者的临床资料，其中男10例、女8例，年龄33.5（13～63）岁。肿瘤完整切除12例，大部分切除6例；良性肿瘤11例，恶性肿瘤7例。 结果全组围手术期无死亡病例，术中呼吸循环衰竭2例。术后发生复张性肺水肿2例，损伤喉返神经l例，肌无力危象1例，心律失常10例，胸腔活动性出血再次开胸止血l例，经治疗均恢复良好出院。 结论手术治疗是巨大纵隔肿瘤的主要治疗方法，良性肿瘤患者手术效果佳，恶性者生存时间与组织分化及肿瘤分期有关，手术以缓解症状为主。
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness and safety of electromagnetic navigation-guided localization and CT-guided percutaneous localization for pulmonary nodules.MethodsThe literature published from the inception to January 2021 about the comparison between electromagnetic navigation-guided localization and CT-guided percutaneous localization for pulmonary nodules in the PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMbase, Chinese Wanfang database and CNKI database was searched. RevMan (version 5.4) software was used for meta-analysis. Nonrandomized controlled trials were evaluated using methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS).ResultsA total of six retrospective studies (567 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. MINORS scores of all studies were all 17 points and above. There were 317 patients in the CT-guided percutaneous localization group and 250 patients in the electromagnetic navigation-guided localization group. The complication rate of the CT-guided percutaneous localization group was significantly higher than that in the electromagnetic navigation-guided localization group (OR=11.08, 95%CI 3.35 to 36.65, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the success rate of localization (OR=0.48, 95%CI 0.16 to 1.48, P=0.20), localization time (MD=0.30, 95%CI –6.16 to 6.77, P=0.93) or nodule diameter (MD=–0.07, 95%CI –0.19 to 0.06, P=0.29) between the two groups.ConclusionElectromagnetic navigation can be used as an effective preoperative positioning method for pulmonary nodules, which has the advantage of lower complication rate compared with the traditional CT positioning method.