To evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of enteral nutrition (EN) via jejunostomy in the early postoperative period in patients with acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis (AHNP), 38 patients were divided into the early group (start EN 3 or 4 days after operation) and the later group (start EN 7 days after operation). All patients received parenteral nutrition at first, then were transited to EN. The enteral nutrition liquid was transfused by continuous drip via jejunostomy in both groups. Levels of serum amylase, blood glucose, as well as the liver function were used as indices of tolerance. Symptoms and physical signs of abdominal pain as well as the level of serum albumin were used as the indices of effectieness. Patients tolerated the therapy well in both groups. Moreover, they enjoyed an earlier correction of hypoalbuminemia with more quickly improved serum albumin and no abdominal pain. Starting enteral nutrition in the early postoperative period is feasible, safe and efficacious for acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis patients. It plays an important role in treating AHNP and improving curing rate.
Objective To explore the clinical value of early enteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis （SAP） by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy （PEG/J）.Methods Treatment condition of nighty patients with SAP were retrospectively analysed.The 90 patients were collected peripheral venous blood respectively on 1， 12， and 18 d after admission to hospital.Forty-five of them were in PEG/J group， the others were in control group. Serum IL-6，TNF-α and endotoxin were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay （ELISA），CD4 /CD8 was determinated by indirect immunofluorescence staining method （FITC-labeled）.Results On 12 d and 18 d，the levels of serum IL-6， TNF-α， and endotoxin in PEG/J group were lower than those in control group （P＜0.01）.The CD4 /CD8 was significantly higher than that in control group （P＜0.01）.In control group， 2 cases complicated upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage，4 cases complicated pancreatic pseudocysts， and 2 cases complicated double infection， the temperature became normal after about 13.5 d.In PEG/J group， there were not upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage and double infection，but 2 cases also complicated pancreatic pseudocysts， the temperature became normal after about 10.5 d.Conclusion The clinical effectiveness of early enteral nutrition in SAP by PEG/J is satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo compare and analyze the short-term efficacy of different surgical methods for Siewert type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ esophagogastric junction carcinoma.MethodsWe selected 82 patients who accepted radical resection of esophagogastric junction carcinoma from March 2015 to March 2018 in our department, including 53 males and 29 females, aged 48-72 (61±6) years. The patients were divided into four groups according to the surgical method: a left thoracotomy group (n=14), a laparoscopic left small thoracotomy group (n=33), a thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis group (n=17), and a thoracoscopic McKeown group (n=18). Their clinical characteristics, operative situations, postoperative complications and survival rate were analyzed.ResultsAmong the four groups, the left thoracotomy group cost the shortest operation time, followed by laparoscopic left small thoracotomy group, thoracoscopic McKeown group and thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis group. The thoracoscopic McKeown group/laparoscopic left small thoracotomy group had the least bleeding. The fewest lymph nodes were dissected in the left thoracotomy group and the most in the thoracoscopic McKeown group. The laparoscopic left small thoracotomy group had the lowest total complication rate and the incidence of pneumonia and arrhythmia among the four groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in survival rate among the four groups (P>0.05).ConclusionFor Siewert type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ esophagogastric junction carcinoma, thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopic radical resection is safe and reliable. Laparoscopic left small thoracotomy has the advantages of minimal invasiveness and complete lymph node dissection, especially for the patients with poor cardiopulmonary function, which will significantly shorten operation time and reduce postoperative complications, so it is worth to be popularized.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of jejunostomy tube versus nasojejunal tube for enteral nutrition after radical resection of esophageal cancer. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM databases were searched to collect the clinical effects of jejunostomy tube versus nasojejunal nutrition tube after radical resection of esophageal cancer from inception to October 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsTwenty-six articles were included, including 17 randomized controlled studies and 9 cohort studies, with a total of 35 808 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that: in the jejunostomy tube group, the postoperative exhaust time (MD=–4.27, 95%CI –5.87 to –2.66, P=0.001), the incidence of pulmonary infection (OR=1.39, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.82, P=0.02), incidence of tube removal (OR=0.11, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.30, P=0.001), incidence of tube blockage (OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.97, P=0.04), incidence of nasopharyngeal discomfort (OR=0.04, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.13, P=0.001), the incidence of nasopharyngeal mucosal damage (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.42, P=0.008), the incidence of nausea and vomiting (OR=0.20, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.47, P=0.003) were significantly shorter or lower than those of the nasojejunal tube group. The postoperative serum albumin level (MD=5.75, 95%CI 5.34 to 6.16, P=0.001) was significantly better than that of the nasojejunal tube group. However, the intraoperative operation time of the jejunostomy tube group (MD=13.65, 95%CI 2.32 to 24.98, P=0.02) and the indent time of the postoperative nutrition tube (MD=17.81, 95%CI 12.71 to 22.91, P=0.001) were longer than those of the nasojejunal nutrition tube. At the same time, the incidence of postoperative intestinal obstruction (OR=6.08, 95%CI 2.55 to 14.50, P=0.001) was significantly higher than that of the nasojejunal tube group. There were no statistical differences in the length of postoperative hospital stay or the occurrence of anastomotic fistula between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionIn the process of enteral nutrition after radical resection of esophageal cancer, jejunostomy tube has better clinical treatment effect and is more comfortable during catheterization, but the incidence of intestinal obstruction is higher than that of traditional nasojejunal tube.
Objective To evaluate the application effect of modified jejunostomy in thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for middle and lower esophageal cancer from 2017 to 2023 in our department was performed. The patients from 2017 to 2020 receiving "C+I" in the upper jejunum according to the "C+I" model, and fistula fixed with only two purse-string sutures and the abdominal wall were allocated into a group A. The patients from 2021 to 2023, on the basis of "C+I" suture, the jejunum and abdominal wall fixed with 3-0 absorbable thread for 1-2 needles at the proximal or distal end of the fistula 10-15 mm, and the upper jejunum and abdominal wall fixed into "curtain" were allocated into a group B. The operation time, jejunostomy time, postoperative pathological stage, and enteral nutrition-related complications such as the incidence of incomplete intestinal obstruction, closed loop intestinal obstruction and intestinal volvulus requiring secondary surgery, skin redness and swelling of intestinal fluid leakage, stoma tube blockage, and accidental extubation were compared between the two groups. Results All patients successfully completed Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy under thoracoscopy. There was no perioperative death. There were 118 patients in the group A, including 72 males and 46 females, with an average age of 64.58±6.30 years. There were 125 patients in the group B, including 76 males and 49 females, with an average age of 65.11±6.81 years. There was no statistical difference in operation time, jejunal fistula time, fistula blockage or accidental extubation rate between the two groups (P>0.05). There was a statistical difference in the incidence of incomplete intestinal obstruction (P=0.035), and closed loop intestinal obstruction requiring secondary surgery (P=0.017). There were 36 patients of eczema-like changes in the patients with severe intestinal leakage and redness in the group A, and 7 patients of intestinal leakage and redness in the group B (P<0.001). Conclusion The modified jejunostomy can significantly reduce the incomplete intestinal obstruction, closed loop intestinal obstruction and secondary operation rate after "C+I" jejunostomy, and significantly improve the leakage of intestinal fluid at the stoma and the injury of surrounding skin and soft tissue. Improvements in certain technologies reduce operational difficulties and is worthy of promotion and application in clinical practice.