Objective To assess the effectiveness of intensive versus routine education on diabetes mellitus for preventing diabetic foot ulcer. Methods We electronically searched CENTRAL (Issue 1, 2013), PubMed (1978-2013), EMbase (1978-2013), VIP (1989-2013) and WanFang Data (1980-2013), hand-searched correlated proceedings and retrieved the references of included studies, for the randomized controlled trials on intensive versus routine education on diabetes mellitus for preventing diabetic foot ulcer all over the world. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results Twelve trials involving 1 841 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) the incidence of diabetic foot ulcer in the intensive education group was lower than the routine group, with a significant difference (RR=0.51, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.84, P=0.008); b) two groups were alike in the amputation rate, with no significant difference (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.17 to 1.67, P=0.28); and c) the score of knowledge on diabetes mellitus was higher in the intensive education group than in the routine education group, with a significant difference (MD=7.32, 95%CI 3.57 to 11.06, P=0.000 1). Conclusion Current evidence shows that: compared with routine education, intensive education could reduce the incidence of diabetic foot ulcer effectively. However, the above conclusion should be verified by conducting more high quality studies.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of diabetic patient education on glycemic control for diabeties. Methods Fifty cases of type 2 diabetic patients with educational interventions from the Diabetic Educational Center of West China Hospital and 50 type 2 diabetic patients without educational intervention were selected randomly. All the patients completed the same questionnaire. The data were analyzed by SPSS 10.0. Results The age of patients in educational group was older and the duration of sickness was longer than those in the control group, but their blood glucoses were better controlled. Conclusions Diabetic patient education is important to improve their glycemic control and decrease the risks and deterioration of diabetic chronic complications.
ObjectiveTo explore the influencing factors for lost follow-up of diabetic patients, looking for suitable follow-up methods for patients in the region of Central and Western China, in order to help ensure the quality of follow-up, improve the rate of follow-up and provide a basis for improving the quality of patients' continuous nursing outside of the hospital. MethodsContinuous nursing was carried out for 600 patients discharged from our department by two full-time diabetes education nurses from September 2012 to April 2014. The data of outside hospital patients who were lost in the follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. According to the sequential order of the patients, they were divided into three groups. The difference among the three groups of patients was analyzed and the effect of nursing intervention on patients' follow-up loss was also analyzed. ResultsThe rate of lost follow-up for the three groups were 29.4%, 20.3%, and 12.2%. Big classroom participation rate was 29.4%, 50.5%, and 57.5%. The lost follow-up rate of group three using team comprehensive management pattern was lower than that in group 1 with traditional supervision intervention. The age of the patients who were lost in the follow-up concentrated under 40 and above 75 years old. The patients with a disease history longer than 10 years with more complications were more likely to be lost in the follow-up. The main reason for lost follow-up was self-conceit and lack of awareness of the follow-up. ConclusionDiversified ways of follow-up can complement each other which can reduce the rate of lost follow-up.