west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "糖耐量异常" 2 results
  • Research on the Mental Health and Quality of Life of Patients with Impaired Glucose Tolerance

    目的 探讨糖耐量异常患者的焦虑抑郁状况及其与生活质量的相关性,为糖尿病相关心理问题的早期识别与干预提供参考。 方法 以2010年1月-2012年6月糖耐量异常患者145例为试验组,健康人群147例作为对照组,两组分别填写焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS),试验组还需填写世界卫生组织生活质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)并对其焦虑、抑郁得分与WHOQOL-BREF的各因子的相关性进行分析。 结果 145例患者中有51例(35.2%)存在抑郁情绪,47例(32.4%)存在焦虑情绪,焦虑合并抑郁情绪者29例(20%)。糖耐量异常患者焦虑、抑郁评分明显高于对照组(P<0.01),其生活质量多个领域评分低于对照组(P<0.01),且生活质量与焦虑、抑郁情绪存在负相关(P<0.05)。 结论 糖耐量异常患者焦虑、抑郁情绪明显高于正常人群,其生活质量偏低,提示了对在该人群进行早期心理干预的必要性。

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • A Study on the Levels of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 and Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide in People with Different Glucose Tolerance Degrees

    【摘要】 目的 了解不同糖代谢状态的人群空腹及口服葡萄糖耐量实验(oral glucose tolerance test,OGTT)餐后胰高血糖素样态-1(GLP-1)和葡萄糖依赖的促胰岛素多态(GIP)水平。 方法 将受试者根据OGTT结果分为3组:正常糖耐量组(NGT,n=61例),糖耐量受损组(IGT,n=53)和2型糖尿病组(T2DM, n=66)。采空腹及糖餐后2 h静脉血检测GLP-1和GIP水平。 结果 T2DM组空腹GLP-1水平低于NGT和IGT组(Plt;0.05)。NGT和IGT的空腹GLP-1水平差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。餐后GLP-1水平三组差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。空腹及餐后GIP水平在NGT、IGT和T2DM均呈逐渐增加的趋势,而且同OGTT-0 h和OGTT-2 h血糖水平呈正相关(r=0.384,0.426;Plt;0.05)。 结论 不同的GLP-1和GIP水平也许是IGT和T2DM胰岛素分泌能力不同的原因之一。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the fasting, and after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), the postprandial levels of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in Chinese people with different degrees of glucose tolerance. Methods Based on the results of OGTT, 180 subjects were divided into three groups: normal glucose tolerance group (NGT group, n=61), impaired glucose tolerance group (IGT group, n=53) and type-2 diabetes mellitus group (T2DM group, n=66). Fasting venous blood and the venous blood 2 hours after OGTT was sampled to detect GLP-1 and GIP levels. Results The fasting GLP-1 level in the T2DM group was significantly lower than that in the NGT and IGT groups (Plt;0.05). There was no significant difference in fasting GLP-1 level between NGT and IGT groups (Pgt;0.05). There was no significant difference in GLP-1 level 2 hours after OGTT among all the three groups (Pgt;0.05). GIP level gradually increased in the order of NGT, IGT and T2DM both before and after glucose load, and it was positively correlated with glucose levels just after OGTT and 2 hours after OGTT (r=0.384,0.426;Plt;0.05). Conclusion Different GLP-1 and GIP levels may be one of the reasons for different insulin secretion ability between IGT and T2DM

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:26 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content