【Abstract】Objective To estimate the value of the infra-red light scanning and the colored ultrasonic Doppler in diagnosis of breast masses. Methods Two hundred and seventy nine patients with breast mass were examined with the infrared light scanning and the colored ultrasonic Doppler in our hospital.Following the two examinations the masses were resected and pathologically examined as a control. Results The conformity of the infra-red light scanning with pathologic diagnosis was 94.0% in 182 hyperplasia masses, while that of the ultrasonic Doppler was 84.6%(P＜0.01). The conformity of the infra-red light scanning with pathology was 91.7% and that of the colored ultrasonic Doppler was 83.3%(Pgt;0.05). The colored ultrasonic Doppler was seemingly more effective than infrared light scanning in diagnosing 9 galactocele and 5 intraductal papilloma, but there is no significant difference(Pgt;0.05). The conformity of the two exams with pathology in 59 fibroadenoma was almost the same.Conclusion The infra-red light scanning is more effective than the colored ultrasonic Doppler in diagnosing the hyperplasia masses, there is no significant difference in diagnosing the breast cancer and the fibroadenoma between the two exams. Combined use of this two exams would increase the accurase of the breast masses.
In order to observe the effect of far infrared rays on the survival of skin flap, the following experiment was performed. Forty-eight SD rats were selected and divided into two groups. The rats received 0.3 w/cm2 radiation twice a day from 3 days before operation to 5 days after operation in the experimental group, while in the control group the rats received none before or after the operation. The flap was designed as 2 cm x 6 cm in the back of the rats with the pedicle caudalward. The microcirculatory changes of the flap were observed, and the survival area of the flap was calculated. The results showed that either in the proximal or in the distal part of the graft, in the experimental group, the mean opening rate, diameter and the flowing velocity of the microvessels were significantly higher than those in the control group (P lt; 0. 05). The mean rate of survival area of the experimental group (80.5%) was also higher than that of the control group (62.7%) (P lt; 0.01). It was suggested that radiation with far infrared rays could dilate the microvessels, improve the flap microcirculation, therefore, enhance the survival of the randomized skin flap.
【Abstract】 Objective To compare the accuracy of color-doppler ultrasonography, mammography and near-infrared light scanning for diagnosing breast diseases. Methods The diagnostic accuracy of the above three imaging methods were analyzed and compared with each other on the basis of the postoperative pathological results. ResultsFive hundreds and sixty-five cases (breast cancer: 274 cases, benign diseases: 291 cases) were examined. The sensitivity of color-doppler ultrasonography, mammography and near-infrared light scanning for diagnosing breast cancer were 83.7%(200/239), 84.2%(64/76) and 76.9%(100/130), respectively. The specificity were 88.6%(226/255), 93.2%(69/74) and 82.6%(114/138), and the accuracy were 86.2%(426/494), 88.7%(133/150) and 79.9%(214/268), respectively. Color-doppler ultrasonography and mammography were superior to near-infrared light in the item of accuracy (P＜0.05), especially for lesions of breast cancers that were less than 2 cm. The false negative rate of near-infrared light was higher (48.8%, 21/43）than those of the other methods in detecting breast cancer at early stage. The sensitivity for detecting intraductal papilloma and inflammation of breast using color-doppler ultrasonography were 58.8%(10/17) and 69.2%(18/26), respectively, which were higher than that of near-infrared light scanning 〔0 and 23.5%(4/17)， P＜0.05 and P＜0.01〕. The sensitivity and the accuracy of near-infrared light without physical examination reduced significantly, in which the sensitivity reduced from 76.9%(100/130) to 56.9%(74/130), P＜0.01, and the accuracy reduced from 79.9%(214/298) to 61.9%(166/268), P＜0.01. Conclusion Color-doppler ultrasonography and mammography are accurate imaging methods for diagnosing breast diseases.