目的总结糖尿病并细菌性肝脓肿(DPHA)的临床特点和诊治经验。方法回顾性分析我院2002年3月至2010年12月期间出院的DPHA与无DPHA(NDPHA)患者的临床资料。结果细菌性肝脓肿患者共22例，其中DPHA患者11例。DPHA组人口学特征、临床表现、白细胞计数与NDPHA组比较差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05); DPHA组血白蛋白低于NDPHA(P=0.006)，而ALT高于NDPHA(P=0.006)。DPHA组病灶个数多于NDPHA组(P=0.032)，且病灶直径也大于NDPHA组(P=0.006)。脓培养: 2组大肠杆菌均为3例; DPHA组克雷伯杆菌4例，而NDPHA组无克雷伯杆菌。DPHA组发生切口感染7例、腹腔感染2例，NDPHA组发生切口感染3例。 DPHA组抗生素使用时间、住院时间及住院费用均高于NDPHA组(Plt;0.05)。2组均分别治愈6例、好转5例，2组均无死亡患者。结论DPHA有其特殊的临床特征，并发症多，住院费用高，但预后与NDPHA差别不大。
目的 比较开腹、腹腔镜和经皮肝穿刺引流3种方法治疗细菌性肝脓肿的优劣性，为细菌性肝脓肿治疗方法的选择提供参考依据。方法 回顾性分析笔者所在医院2010年9月至2011年7月期间收治的39例细菌性肝脓肿患者的临床资料，根据其治疗方式将患者分为开腹组、腹腔镜组和经皮经肝穿刺引流组（穿刺组）3组，对3组的首次治愈者比例、1个月治愈者比例、发生并发症者比例、住院时间及住院费用进行比较。结果 开腹组、腹腔镜组和穿刺组首次治愈者比例分别为10/12、8/9及12/18，3组间差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）； 1个月治愈者比例分别为11/12、9/9及17/18，3组间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；发生并发症者比例分别为2/12、1/9及2/18，腹腔镜组和穿刺组之间的差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），2组与开腹组相比差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；住院时间分别为（15.4±4.5） d、（9.7±2.3） d及 （16.7±5.8） d （P＜0.05）；住院费用分别为（1.9±0.5）万元、（1.3±0.3）万元及（0.8±0.2）万元（P＜0.05）。结论 开腹组、腹腔镜组和穿刺组3种治疗方法各有利弊，个体化选择治疗方式是肝脓肿的治疗策略。
Objective To determine the effectiveness of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) and to compare PCD with percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) in the management of bacterial liver abscess. Methods The medical records of 206 patients with bacterial liver abscess admitted to this hospital between January 1989 and December 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. The outcomes of 96 patients receiving percutaneous treatment including PCD (PCD group, n=56) and PNA (PNA group, n=40) were compared, including the length of hospital stay, rates of procedure-related complications, treatment success, and death. Results There was no statistical difference in patients’ demographics or abscess characteristics between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay in the PCD group and the PNA group were 1.79% vs 2.50%， 1.79% vs 2.50%， and (19.2±13.1) d vs (20.2±12.9) d, respectively, and the P values were 1.000, 1.000, and 0.887, respectively. There was statistically significant difference in successful rate between two groups （96.43% vs 75.00%， P=0.002）, but all simple abscesses with diameter of 5 cm or less were successfully managed in both PNA group and PCD group （13/13 vs 16/17， P=1.000）. Conclusions PCD is more effective than PNA in the management of bacterial liver abscess. PNA can be used as a valid alternative for simple abscesses with 5 cm in diameter or smaller.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical features of bacterial liver abscess (BLA) with or without diabetes and provide reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.MethodsThe clinical data of 312 patients with BLA admitted to Huaian First People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2016 to January 2020 were collected. The differences in the clinical symptoms and signs, results of laboratory, imaging, etiological tests, treatment methods, and outcomes of the patients between with and without diabetes were compared.ResultsA total of 312 patients with BLA were collected, 128 BLA patients with diabetes and 184 BLA patients without diabetes. ① There were no significant differences in gender and age between patients with and without diabetes, but the boby mass index of BLA patients with diabetes was higher than that of the patients without diabetes [(25.54±4.99) kg/m2 versus (23.75±3.92) kg/m2, t=3.546, P<0.001]. ② In terms of etiology, the main cause of BLA was the biliary tract infection [37.18% (116/312)]. The incidence of cryptogenic infections in the BLA patients with diabetes was significantly higher than that of the BLA patients without diabetes [39.06% versus 26.63%, χ2=5.386, P=0.020]. ③ In terms of clinical manifestations, the fever was the main symptom of BLA [97.76% (305/312)]. The incidences of abdominal pain and percussion pain in the liver area of BLA patients with diabetes were significantly lower than those in the BLA patients without diabetes [32.03% versus 51.63%, χ2=11.793, P=0.001; 15.63% versus 30.98%, χ2=9.572, P=0.002]. ④ In terms of laboratory tests, compared with the patients without diabetes, the albumin level was lower [(30.88±5.25) g/L versus (33.67±4.33) g/L, t=–5.139, P<0.001], the procalcitonin level and neutral cell ratio were higher [(44.22±39.56) μg/L versus (36.03±22.73) μg/L, t=2.312, P=0.021; (86.68±7.05)% versus (80.73±8.12)%, t=6.710, P<0.001] in the patients with diabetes. ⑤ In terms of imaging findings, the BLA was mainly single abscesses [77.56% (242/312)] and mainly in the right lobe [66.34% (207/312)]. ⑥ In terms of microbiological examination, the bacterial positive detection rate of all patients was 71.15% (222/312). The main pathogen was Klebsiella pneumoniae [71.62% (159/222)]. The Klebsiella pneumoniae infection rate in the BLA patients with diabetes was higher than that in the BLA patients without diabetes [79.30% versus 66.67%, χ2=4.161, P=0.041]. ⑦ The septic shock occurred in 20 (6.41%) patients with BLA. After treatment of all patients, 4 cases of BLA with diabetes and 2 cases of BLA without diabetes died. The patients who died all came from septic shock.ConclusionsClinical manifestations of BLA patients with diabetes are atypical and main infection is Klebsiella pneumoniae. When BLA combined with septic shock, individual treatment strategy should be chosen basing on actual situation of patient.