west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "结肠切除术" 3 results
  • Clinical Application of Laparoscopic Total Colectomy in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis(Report of 4 Cases)

    目的 探讨腹腔镜全结肠切除术在家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)中的应用价值。方法 回顾性分析我院2008年1月至2009年10月期间收治的行腹腔镜全结肠切除术的4例FAP患者的临床资料,对手术安全性和术后恢复情况进行分析。结果 4例患者均顺利行腹腔镜全结肠切除术,无中转开腹,无手术并发症及死亡。腹部切口长6.0 cm,手术时间300~380 min(平均330 min),术中出血量90~250 ml(平均160 ml)。术后2~3 d肛门开始排气,术后住院时间7~11 d(平均9 d)出院。出院后大便稀薄,8~12次/d,给予易蒙停治疗后缓解。随访2~22个月(平均14个月),无近期并发症发生。结论 腹腔镜全结肠切除术治疗FAP安全、有效,近期效果良好。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes between hand assisted laparoscopic and standard laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a meta-analysis

    Objective To assess clinical outcomes of hand assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (HALC) and standard laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (SLC). Methods The databases of Wanfang, CNKI, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were electronically searched. The relevant literatures were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Cochrane collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias was used to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess non-randomized comparative studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 9 studies were included and involved 976 patients (480 patients in the HALC group and 496 patients in the SLC group). The results of meta-analysis showed that the HALC group was favor of shorter operative time as compared with the SLC group (P<0.05), but the length of incision and hospital stay were longer in the HALC group (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between these two groups regarding as the conversion rate, time to return of bowel function, feeding time, reoperative rate during hospitalization, postoperative complications rate, and harvested lymph node number (P>0.05). As for the follow-up results, the 3-year survival rate was about 90%, and 5-year survival rate was about 80%, and there were no statistical differences in terms of recurrence rate and mortality between the HALC group and the SLC group (P>0.05). Conclusions Both HALC and SLC could achieve satisfactory minimal invasive outcomes and oncologic radical effects, and HALC has an advantage of shorter operative time, yet length of incision and hospital stay are longer than SLC. Therefore, HALC could be considered as an alternative to minimal invasive right hemicolectomy.

    Release date:2017-05-04 02:26 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 两种机械吻合方式在腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌术中的回顾性对照研究

    目的比较体外机械性侧侧吻合与端侧吻合在腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术中的应用效果。方法回顾性分析笔者所在医院 2015 年 6 月至 2018 年 6 月期间采用机械吻合进行消化道重建的 89 例腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术患者的临床资料,其中机械性侧侧吻合 32 例,机械性端侧吻合 57 例;比较 2 组患者的一般资料、手术时间、术中出血量、术后首次肛门排气时间、耐受流质饮食时间和术后住院时间;并比较术后并发症发生情况。结果2 组患者的一般资料、术中出血量、耐受流质饮食时间和术后住院时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);端侧吻合组手术时间短于侧侧吻合组 [160.0(150.0,177.5) min 比 170.0(156.3,203.8)min],差异有统计学意义(P=0.049);端侧吻合组首次肛门排气时间短于侧侧吻合组 [(2.5±0.9)d 比(3.0±1.0)d],差异有统计学意义(P=0.021);2 组患者术后各并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治性切除手术中相比机械性侧侧吻合,机械性端侧吻合的手术时间及术后首次肛门通气时间较短,其并发症无统计学差异,提示机械性端侧吻合可能更具优势。

    Release date:2019-06-26 03:20 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content