Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with vena cava filter on deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremity.Methods The clinical data of 65 patients with DVT of lower extremities from January 2008 to August 2009 were analyzed retrospectively, whose course of diseases were not more than 7 d and clinical type included central type and mixed type. Thirty-two cases were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with vena cava filter, while administrating treatment of anticoagulation and activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis, which were named as study group. Thirty-three cases were treated traditionally with thrombolysis, anticoagulation, and activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis, which were named as control group. The course of therapy was continued 10-14 d, then the efficacy in two groups patients was evaluated. Results It was (7.35±1.42) cm that circumference difference before treatment between affected extremties and unaffected extremties in study group, which of 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment was (4.21±1.12) cm， (2.87±0.98) cm, and (1.22±1.02) cm, respectively. Circumference difference between before and after treatment had significant difference in study group (Plt;0.01). It was (6.97±1.27) cm that circumference difference before treatment between affected extremties and unaffected extremties in control group, which of 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment was (5.72±1.31) cm, (4.58±0.88) cm, and (3.18±1.24) cm, respectively. Circumference difference between before treatment and 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment had significant difference in control group (Plt;0.05 or Plt;0.01). Circumference difference before treatment in two groups had no significant difference (Pgt;0.05). Circumference difference after treatment at different time points in two groups was significantly different, respectively (Plt;0.01). Circumference difference after treatment at different time points in study group was significantly less than that in control group, respectively (Plt;0.01). After 14 d, complete recanalization rate （71.88%, 23/32） and cure rate (71.88%, 23/32) of iliofemoral vein in study group were significant higher than that (36.36%, 12/33) in control group (Plt;0.01). No pulmonary embolism occurred. Conclusion In terms of ideal therapy targets of DVT of lower extremity, the catheterdirected thrombolysis combined with vena cava filter is obviously superior to traditional thrombolysis treatment.
目的 探讨经大隐静脉-穿通支静脉入路行深静脉置管溶栓术(catheter-directed thrombolysis，CDT)治疗混合型下肢深静脉血栓形成(deep venous thrombosis，DVT）的临床疗效。 方法 对42例急性混合型下肢DVT患者，经踝大隐静脉-穿通支静脉入路，将溶栓导管置入深静脉行CDT治疗。回顾性分析该42例患者的临床资料，评价其溶栓疗效。 结果 42例患者均成功经大隐静脉-穿通支静脉入路行CDT治疗。溶栓时间为5～7 d、(4.22±1.43) d；术后所有患者的肢体肿胀均明显好转；大腿周径差由术前的（7.76±1.72）cm缩减为术后的（2.21±0.91) cm（t=14.18，P＜0.01），小腿周径差由术前的（4.45±1.33）cm缩减为术后的(1.43±0.69）cm（t=11.92，P＜0.01），静脉通畅度评分由术前的12分降为术后的3分（Z=-3.03，P＜0.01）。术后发生穿刺处渗血2例，血尿2例，少量咯血1例。38例获访3～26个月，中位数为15个月。随访期间，1例发生支架远端重度狭窄，1例对侧下肢发生DVT。 结论 经大隐静脉-穿通支静脉入路行CDT治疗混合型下肢DVT，其操作简便，溶栓效率高，是临床值得推广的溶栓途径之一。
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) through three different approaches combined with iliac venous endovascular therapy for acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) complicated with Cockett syndrome of the lower extremities. MethodThe clinical data of 87 patients with CDT through three different approaches (small saphenous vein group, popliteal vein group, and posterior tibial vein group) combined with iliac venous endovascular therapy for DVT complicated with Cockett syndrome of the lower extremities were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThe lower extremity swelling of all the patients were disappeared obviously within 72 h after surgery, there was no death related surgery and pulmonary embolism. The limb edema reduction rates had no significant differences among the small saphenous vein group, popliteal vein group, and posterior tibial vein group﹝(77±13)% versus (82±12)% versus (77±18)%, P > 0.05﹞. The recanalization rates of thrombolysis had no significant differences among the above three groups﹝(86.5±10.6)% versus (92.0±7.7)% versus (87.3±7.8)%, P > 0.05﹞. The time required for the cannulation in the posterior tibial vein group was significantly shorter than that of the small saphenous vein group or popliteal vein group﹝(15.14±3.62) min versus (32.62±9.36) min or (42.79±13.30) min, P < 0.01﹞. All the patients were performed by balloon dilatation and iliac vein stenting. Eighty-seven cases were followed-up for 1-24 months, the primary patency rate of iliac venous was 100%. ConclusionsCDT with iliac venous endovascular therapy is an effective method in treatment of acute DVT with Cockett syndrome. CDT through posterior tibial vein is an easier and effective method with less complications and time. This way could be acceptable in basal hospital.
ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic evaluation of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular in the treatment of lower extremity atherosclerotic occlusive disease (ASO). MethodsClinical data of 64 ASO patients who were treated in our hospital from June 2011 to October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups according to the therapies:33 patients were treated by catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular (combination group), and the other 31 patients were only treated by multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular (intervention group). Comparison of the clinical indexes was performed between the 2 groups, including vascular patency rate, stent implantation rate, operation time, ankle-brachial index (ABI), saturation of blood oxygen (SO2) of toes, temperature of foot skin, amputation rate, and hospitalization expense. ResultsIn the same group (combination group and intervention group), compared with the time point of before operation, the clinical indexes of the ABI, SO2 of toes, and temperature of foot skin were higher after operation (P<0.05). At the same time point of before or after operation, there were no significant difference between the 2 groups in ABI, SO2 of toes, and temperature of foot skin (P>0.05). The vascular patency rate of combination group was higher than that of intervention group[97.0% (32/33) vs. 83.9% (26/31)], P<0.05. But the stent implantation rate[18.2% (6/33) vs. 64.5% (20/31)], amputation rate[3.0% (1/33) vs. 16.1% (5/31)], operative time[(2.0±0.5) h vs. (4.0±1.1) h], and hospitalization expense of patients who got successful limb salvage[(8 500±1 200) yuan vs. (34 000±2 100) yuan] of combination group were all lower or shorter than those of intervention group (P<0.05). After operation, there were no complication happened in the patients who got successful limb salvage of combination group (n=32) and intervention group (n=26). In postoperative 6 months, the lower extremity arteries in patients who got successful limb salvage of combination group and intervention group were all examined by color ultrasonography, and they were unblocked. The lower extremity arteries of the patients with stent implantation in the 2 groups suffered with no obvious stenosis or occlusion. ConclusionsCatheter-directed thrombolysis combined with multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular can become one of the surgical treatment methods for ASO, which characterized by minimally invasive operation, effective treatment, and low cost.
ObjectiveTo assess the therapeutic effect of catheter thrombolysis combined with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) complicated with floating IVC thrombus. MethodsThe clinical data of 16 patients with DVT complicated with floating IVC thrombus from July 2013 to November 2014 in this hospital were collected. These patients were treated with the catheter thrombolysis combined with IVC filter placement, the IVC filter was placed via jugular vein, the catheter thrombolysis was performed by the side of the small saphenous vein, the amount of urokinase was (60-80) ×104 U/d. Results①The floating IVC thrombi of 13 patients were disappeared following catheter thrombolysis combined with IVC filter placement therapy, a small amount of visible thrombi were adhered on the recycled IVC filter, the lower limb swelling was relieved, the IVC could effectively open.②The IVC filters of 2 patients could not be recycled due to the adhesion of floating IVC thrombus and lumen of IVC resulting in luminal stenosis.③The floating IVC thrombus of 1 patient was disappeared, the IVC filter could not be recy-cled due to a large of thrombi adhered on the IVC filter. The lower limb swelling was slowly relieved. The complications such as severe pulmonary embolism didn't happen in all the patients during treatment and following-up. ConclusionThe limited data preliminarily shows that it is an effective and safe method by catheter thrombolysis combined with IVC filter placement in treatment of DVT complicated with floating IVC thrombus.
ObjectiveTo investigate the significance of catheter thrombolysis combined with one-stage iliac vein percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (or stent implantation) in the treatment of acute left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis secondary to Cockett syndrome.MethodsForty-one cases of Cockett syndrome complicated with acute left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis were retrospectively analyzed and summarized in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2019. Catheter directed thrombolysis was performed under the protection of filter, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stent implantation was performed in the first stage of the iliac vein stenosis or occlusion after thrombolysis. Compared the circumference of upper and lower legs of 15 cm above and below patella of the healthy and affected limbs, before and after treatment, and analyzed the venous patency rate.ResultsThe average time of using thrombolytic catheter were (7±3) days, and the average dosage of urokinase was (358.32±69.38) ×104 U. A total of thirty-five Bard stents were implanted (35 cases), four cases underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and two cases gave up treatment. Before and after treatment, the circumference difference of the higher leg, the circumference difference of the lower leg, and the venous patency were significantly different before and after thrombolysis (P<0.01). The venous patency rate was 58%–75% in this group, and the average venous patency rate was (61±10)%. There was no severe bleeding complication occurred. Thirty-five patients were followed up for 3–26 months, the preservation rate of the valve was 82.86% (29/35), and the first patency rate of iliac vein was 100% (39/39). During the follow-up period, thrombosis recurred in one case of untreated iliac vein, and acute thrombosis in the right side of one case was caused by long iliac vein stent entering the inferior vena cava. No pulmonary embolism was found.ConclusionOn the basis of catheter thrombolysis, one stage removal of iliac vein obstruction in the treatment of acute left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis can relieve the clinical symptoms, reduce the recurrence rate of thrombosis, and reduce the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis syndrome after catheter thrombolysis.
ObjectiveTo compare the differences of incidence rate and severity of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) of patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated by catherter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) or via peripheral vein thrombolysis (PVT).MethodsThe patients with unilateral lower extremity DVT who had received anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy in the Nanchong Central Hospital from January 2012 to January 2015 were collected. These patients were divided into CDT group and PVT group according to the different thrombolysis methods, and then the thrombolytic rates, thrombolytic complications, and the incidence rate and severity of PTS of 5-year follow up results were calculated and compared.ResultsA total of 137 cases of DVT were collected, 79 in the CDT group and 58 in the PVT group. There were no significant differences in the gender, age, course of disease, thrombus type, and other baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The thrombolytic rate of the CDT group was (78.6±16.3)% and PVT group was (27.3±12.1)%, the difference was significant (t=21.14, P<0.001). The rate of thrombolytic complications between the PVT group and CDT group had no statistical significance (32.8% versus 21.5%, χ2=2.18, P=0.134). The 5-year follow up was completed in 116 cases, 74 patients from the CDT group and 42 patients from the PVT group respectively, the result showed that the incidence rate of the PTS in the CDT group was lower than that in the PVT group (35.1% versus 88.1%, χ2=30.28, P<0.001), and theseverity of PTS in the CDT group was milder than that in the PVT group too (Z=16.52,P<0.001).ConclusionFrom the results of this study, CDT is able to increase thrombolytic rate and effectively reduce incidence rate and severity of PTS.