目的 探讨小儿腹股沟斜疝行缩小内环口的手术治疗效果。方法 对我院1994～1999年285例小儿腹股沟斜疝行疝囊高位结扎+内环口修补的资料进行回顾性分析。结果 285例患者全部于术后5～7天拆线，痊愈出院，无严重并发症发生。有267例获随访，随访率93.7%，随访时间1～5年。术后复发2例，复发率0.7%。结论 在对小儿腹股沟斜疝行传统的疝囊高位结扎基础上加行内环修补术，手术操作简便，能有效提高疗效，降低术后复发率。
ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between alumina ceramic particles and aseptic loosening of the joint prosthesis and the effect of lanthanum chloride on the secretion of interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) of macrophage RAW264.7 induced by alumina ceramic particles. MethodsRAW264.7 cells were cultured in vitro and divided randomly into 4 groups according to different culture solutions:blank control group (group A),1 mg/mL alumina ceramic particles (group B),1 mg/mL alumina ceramic particles and 10 μmol/L lanthanum chloride (group C),and 10 μmol/L lanthanum chloride (group D).The cell growth was detected by MTT,and ELISA,RT-PCR,and Western blot were used to test the expressions of IL-1β,TNF-α,and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB). ResultsThere was no significant difference in cell growth among all groups by MTT (F=2.180,P=0.142).RT-PCR results showed that the expressions of IL-1β,TNF-α,and NF-κB mRNA in group B were significantly higher than those in the other 3 groups (P<0.05); the expressions in group D were significantly lower than those in group A (P<0.05).ELISA results showed that the contents of IL-1β and TNF-α in group B were significantly higher than those in the other 3 groups (P<0.05); the contents in group D were significantly lower than those in group A (P<0.05).Western blot analysis revealed that the expression of NF-κB protein in group B was significantly higher than that in the other 3 groups (P<0.05). ConclusionAlumina ceramic particles can stimulate the secretion of IL-1β and TNF-α of macrophage,and lanthanum chloride can inhibit the secretion of IL-1β and TNF-α of macrophage.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of the new anterolateral approach of the distal femur for the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Methods Between July 2007 and December 2009, 58 patients with distal femoral fractures were treated by new anterolateral approach of the distal femur in 28 patients (new approach group) and by conventional approach in 30 patients (conventional approach group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, affected side, type of fracture, disease duration, complication, or preoperative intervention (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, hospitalization days, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score of knee were recorded. Results Operation was successfully completed in all patients of 2 groups, and healing of incision by first intention was obtained; no vascular and nerves injuries occurred. The operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency of new approach group were significantly less than those of conventional approach group (P lt; 0.05). But the intraoperative blood loss and the hospitalization days showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 19.8 months). Bone union was shown on X-ray films; the fracture healing time was (12.62 ± 2.34) weeks in the new approach group and was (13.78 ± 1.94) weeks in the conventional approach group, showing no significant difference (t=2.78, P=0.10). The knee HSS score at last follow-up was 94.4 ± 4.2 in the new approach group, and was 89.2 ± 6.0 in the conventional approach group, showing significant difference between 2 groups (t=3.85, P=0.00). Conclusion New anterolateral approach of the distal femur for distal femoral fractures has the advantages of exposure plenitude, minimal tissue trauma, and early function rehabilitation training so as to enhance the function recovery of knee joint.
Objective To investigate the influence of the integration of fracture treatment and exercise rehabilitation on the effectiveness in the patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur. Methods Between January 2007 and December 2009, 3 873 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur were surgically treated in 56 hospitals. Of them, 1 970 cases were treated with rehabilitation training according to scale of safety assessment of early exercise rehabilitation of patients with fractures (trial group), 1 903 cases were treated with traditional rehabilitation training methods (control group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, fracture type, internal fixation type, or postoperative safety score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All the patients were followed up 13-49 months (mean, 30.5 months). There was no significant difference in the incidences of bone nonunion, delayed union, and systemic complication between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05); significant differences were found in the incidences of incision complication, deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity, and the overall complication between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). At 6 and 12 months after operation, the trial group was significantly better than the control group in the recovery of hip motion, curative effectiveness classification, and the excellent and good rate (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur guided by the integration of fracture treatment and exercise rehabilitation can apparently improve the prognosis and reduce the incidence of complications.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between improved anterolateral approach and lateral approach in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fracture. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, from 61 patients with senile intertrochanteric fracture treated between February 2008 and February 2010. Of 61 patients, 34 patients underwent improved anterolateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (improved group), and 27 patients underwent conventional lateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, Evans classification, comorbidities, disease duration, or Harris hip scores between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The operation was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time, blood loss, perspective frequency during operation, drainage volume, hospitalization days, and out-of-bed time in the improved group were significantly less than those in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18.7 months). Bone union was achieved in both groups; the fracture healing time was (11.64 ± 1.28) weeks in the improved group and was (12.29 ± 1.12) weeks in the conventional group, showing no significant difference (t=2.15, P=0.15). Harris hip scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly better than preoperative scores in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), and significant differences were found among different time points after operation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), between 2 groups after operation (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of incision infection, limb shortening, coax vara, internal fixation loosening, main screw cutting-out from femoral head between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), but the incidence of total complications in the improved group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional lateral approach, improved anterolateral approach has the advantages of sufficient exposure, reducing muscle damage and surgical risk in treating intertrochanteric fracture. Operating treatment of improved anterolateral approach combined with early rehabilitation after surgery can recover hip joint function as quickly as possible.