目的结合文献对两种乙状结肠造口术后造口并发症进行对比分析。方法对我院1996~2004年资料完整的210例两种永久性乙状结肠造口术病例进行回顾性分析。结果在98例传统的永久性乙状结肠造口术（传统组）中，Miles术87例，Hartmann术11例; 造口并发症24例，发生率24.49%，其中造口缺血4例（4.08%），内疝2例（2.04%），造口旁疝8例（8.16%），造口回缩4例（4.08%），造口狭窄2例（2.04%），造口脱垂4例（4.08%）。在112例永久性左下腹腹膜外隧道腹壁造口术（腹膜外组）中，Miles术104例，Hartmann术8例； 造口并发症15例，发生率13.39%，其中造口缺血1例（0.89%），造口旁疝4例（3.57%），造口回缩2例（1.79%），造口狭窄1例（0.89%），造口脱垂1例（0.89%），排便困难伴有粪石6例（5.36%）。结论永久性左下腹腹膜外隧道腹壁造口术后造口并发症明显少于传统的永久性乙状结肠造口术，值得临床推广使用。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of health education pathway intervention on self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in colostomy patients. MethodsEighty-eight rectal cancer patients who had undergone colostomy were randomly divided into control group and intervention group (with 44 patients in each) between March 2012 and September 2013. The control group received conventional nursing only, while the intervention group were given health education pathway intervention besides conventional nursing. The self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in the two groups under pre-colostomy state, one week after colostomy and two weeks after colostomy were surveyed and compared based on the exercise of self-care agency scale and the health promotion lifestyle profile. ResultsAfter health education pathway intervention, the scores of self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the hospitalization expenditure was also obviously lower. Furthermore, the satisfaction degree on nursing service was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe health education pathway intervention can greatly improve self-care agency and quality of life in rectal cancer patients who have undergone colostomy.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of enteral nutrition via stoma of jejunum or nasal-jejunum tube after Whipple procedure. MethodsEighty-seven patients performed Whipple procedure were divided into nasaljejunum tube group(n=47)and stoma of jejunum group(n=40)according to the different enteral nutrition methods. The adverse reactions such as vomiting, abdominal distension, pharyngeal pain, and hypostatic pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, and serum glucose and electrolyte(CL-, Na+, K+)on day 1, 3, 5 after operation were compared between two groups. ResultsCompared with the nasal-jejunum tube group, the rates of adverse reactions and hypostatic pneumonia were more lower(P < 0.05), the hospitalization expense was more less (P < 0.05) in the nasal-jejunum tube group. The rate of anastomotic leakage and hospital stay had no significant differences between the nasal-jejunum tube group and stoma of jejunum group(P > 0.05). The differences of serum glucose and electrolyte(CL-, Na+, K+)on day 1, 3, 5 after operation were not statistically significant between two groups(P > 0.05). ConclusionsEnteral nutrition via the stoma of jejunum after Whipple procedure has some better clinical effects in reducing adverse reactions such as vomiting, abdominal distension, pharyngeal pain, hypostatic pneumonia. The hospitalization expenses are decreased. There are no obvious effects on the hospital stay, blood glucose and electrolyte concentration on day 1, 3, 5 after operation.