Objective To explore the treatment effects of one-way valve lung volume reduction surgery for heterogeneous emphysema.Methods Seven heterogeneous emphysema Beagle dogs were each implanted in right lung2-4 pieces ofbronchial one-way valve.The animals were sacrificed two months later.Macro- and microscopic pathology changes of the lungs were observed.Results Of 21 valves implanted，2 were expectorated，and 19 were in normal position.The dogs did not have obvious adverse reactions.Generally specimens of the occluded lobes had different levels of lung volume decrease，such as texture stiffened，focal scar formation，atelectasis，pulmonary fibrosis.Pathological biopsy showed moderate alveolitis and pulmonary interstitial fibrosis.Conclusion One-way valve lung volume reduction is effective for heterogeneous emphysema
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical effects and health economics of lung volume reduction surgery（LVRS）, single lung transplantation（SLTx） and bilateral lung transplantation（BLTx） for patients with end-stage emphysema. Methods A total of 61 patients with end-stage emphysema, including 39 patients who underwent LVRS（LVRS group）, 14 patients who underwent SLTx（SLTx group）, and 8 patients who underwent BLTx（BLTx group） from September 2002 to August 2008 in Wuxi People’s Hospital, were analyzed retrospectively. Lung function, arterial blood gas analysis and 6-minute walk distance（6-MWD）were assessed before their surgery and 6 months, 1-year and 3-year after their surgery respectively. Their 1-year and 3-year survival rates were observed. Cost-effectiveness analyses were made from a health economics perspective. Results Compared with their preoperative results, their mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second（FEV1.0）in LVRS group increased by 75%, 83% and 49% at 6 months, 1-year and 3-year postoperatively, by 176%, 162% and 100% in SLTx group, and by 260%, 280% and 198% in BLTx group respectively. Their mean forced vital capacity（FVC）in LVRS group increased by 21%, 41% and 40% at 6 months, 1-year and 3-year postoperatively, by 68% , 73% and 55% in SLTx group, and by 82%, 79% and 89% in BLTx group respectively. Their exercise endurance as measured by 6-MWD increased by 75%, 136% and 111% in LVRS group at 6 months, 1-year and 3-year postoperatively, by 513%, 677% and 608% in SLTx group, and by 762%, 880% and 741% in BLTx group respectively. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates after operation were 74.40% and 58.90% in LVRS group, 85.80% and 64.30% in SLTxgroup, and 62.50% and 50.00% in BLTx group respectively. The three years’ cost utility of SLTx group was significantly higher than that of BLTx group（1 668.00 vs.1 168.55, P＜ 0.05）and LVRS group （1 668.00 vs. 549.46, P＜ 0.05）. Conclusion SLTx and BLTx are better than LVRS in improving patients’ lung function and exercise endurance for end-stage emphysema patients. LVRS is more cost-effective than SLTx and BLTx in the early postoperative period. With the development of medical technology and decreased expenses of lung transplantation and immunosuppressive agents, lung transplantation will become the first surgical choice for end-stage emphysema patients.
Objective To investigate the effect of lung volume reduction surgery （LVRS） on messenger RNA expression levels of cytoskeletal proteins in diaphragmatic muscle tissues of emphysematous rabbits. Methods A total of 40 rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups （10 rabbits in each group） ：normal control group, emphysema group, sham operation group and LVRS group. Rabbits in control group were intratracheally administered with 0.9% normal sodium, but those in other groups were intratracheally administered with 0.4% papain at the dose of 0.5 ml/kg and inhaled cigarette smoke to induce emphysema model. Then, rabbits in emphysema group were fed routinely, however, after median sternotomy , bilateral LVRS was performed in LVRS group but not in sham operation group. The mRNA expression levels of titin and nebulin in the diaphragmatic muscles of rabbits in each group were detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction（RT-PCR）. Results Compared with control group, the mRNA expression levels of titin and nebulin in the rabbit diaphragm of emphysema groups and sham operation group decreased significantly （P〈0.01 ）, so did those in LVRS group （P〈0.05）. But it increased significantly in LVRS group compared with emphysema group and sham operation group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion LVRS can increase the mRNA expression levels of titin and nebulin in diaphragmatic muscle tissues of emphysematous rabbits, which may be the associated mechanisms at the molecular level in restoring the functions of the emphysematous diaphragm by LVRS.
Lung volume reduction surgery （LVRS） has been applied generally since it was redeveloped and lucubrated. A recent large, multicenter trial showed LVRS can improve lung function, exercise capacity, quality of life, and even survival in certain highly selected patients. LVRS has been developed as an effective therapy for severe emphysema, which offers a new approach for the victims of emphysema. The development of operative technique and clinical effect about LVRS are reviewed in this article.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and efficacy of staged bilateral single-port thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for the patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema (COPE). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of eleven male patients with bilateral COPE and bullae in Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University from January 2013 through June 2014. All the patients underwent staged bilateral single-port thoracoscopic LVRS with their age of 60.27± 12.11 years. The hyperinflated bullae were resected using endoscopic staplers (Endo-GIA), followed by continuous suture and biological glue for reinforcement of the margin. Besides, the pulmonary function, blood gas assay, 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD), and life quality evaluated by short form 36 Health survey questionnaire (SF-36) were recorded before and after LVRS respectively. ResultsAll the patients survived after surgery. Chest tube drainage time was 9.09± 1.31 days. Postoperative hospital stay was 15.73± 2.75 days. There were 5 patients with persistent air leakage and 7 patients with pulmonary infection who were cured finally. The pulmonary function, arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2), 6-MWD and life quality after unilateral or bilateral LVRS improved than those before surgery in postoperative 3 months. However, there was no statistical difference in outcomes between unilateral and bilateral LVRS patients. ConclusionStaged bilateral single-port thoracoscopic LVRS could improve short-term life quality of patients with COPE.
Emphysema is a chronic progressive disease characterized by abnormal terminal bronchioles. Patients in end-stage have limited treatment. Lung volume reduction surgery(LVRS) is to remove the non-functional emphysematous lung tissue with the aim of palliating symptoms in selected patient with severe emphysema. It provides a new therapeutic method for emphysema. When LVRS is widely accepted after 1990s, a large number of institutions carried out the researches on surgical approaches, perioperative mortality, long-term efficacy and complications. Its targeted beneficial patients and surgical safety had been confirmed too. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) successfully carried out on the basis of the development of LVRS and bronchoscopy. This article reviews the surgical approaches, safety and efficacy of LVRS and BLVR in patients with emphysema.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of closed thoracic drainage with single tube or double tubes after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed on 50 patients (39 males, 11 females) who underwent three-port thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery in our hospital from January 2013 to March 2019. Twenty-five patients with single indwelling tube after surgery were divided into the observation group and 25 patients with double indwelling tubes were divided into the control group.ResultsThere was no significant difference in pulmonary retension on day 3 after surgery, postoperative complications, the patency rate of drainage tube before extubation, retention time or postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05). Postoperative pain and total amount of nonsteroidal analgesics use in the observation group was less than those in the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionIt is safe and effective to perform closed thoracic drainage with single indwelling tube after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery, which can significantly reduce the incidence of related adverse drug reactions and facilitate rapid postoperative rehabilitation with a reduction of postoperative pain and the use of analgesic drugs.