目的考察皮下通道型胆囊肝胆管成形术（STHG）治疗肝胆管结石及胆管狭窄的中、远期疗效。方法对该院1994年12月至2000年6月期间行STHG手术的59例患者的术后中、远期并发症进行统计分析。结果STHG的术后并发症发生率较低，而且并发症的种类也较少； 本组病例术后无返流性胆管炎的表现，也无胃肠道功能紊乱和吻合口溃疡发生。结论STHG既保存了胆囊及Oddi括约肌功能，又保证了胆汁的生理流向，还能防止肠液的返流，从而避免了术后消化功能紊乱和返流性胆管炎的发生，是一种较为理想的治疗肝胆管结石和肝门部胆管狭窄的术式。
ObjectiveTo discuss the effect of palliative drainage operation on the life quality of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. MethodsCholangiocarcinoma data of our hospital in recent 21 years were analysed retrospectively. They were divided into four groups: RouxenY choledochojejunostomy group, bridge internal drainage group, PTCD (or ERBD) internal drainage group, and operative external drainage group. The operative mortality, incidence of postoperative cholangitis and survival period were compared among groups.ResultsThe total perioperative mortality of 193 cases of palliative operation was 9.3%, there was no difference among groups (P＞0.05). The rate of postoperative cholangitis in the bridge internal drainage group (10.0%) was lower than that of RouxenY choledochojejunostomy group (19.4%),P＜0.05, the rate of cholangitis in PTCD (or ERBD) internal drainage group (37.5%) and operative external drainage group (38.1%) were significantly higher than that of RouxenY choledochojejunostomy group (P＜0.01). There was no significant difference between RouxenY choledochojejunostomy group 〔(9.2±1.8) months〕 and PTCD (or ERBD) internal drainage group 〔(8.8±1.9) months〕 in survival period (P＞0.05)，but the survival period of the above groups were significantly higher than that of bridge internal drainage group 〔(6.5±1.6) months〕，P＜0.05, and operative (or PTCD) external drainage group 〔(4.3±2.0) months〕,P＜0.01.ConclusionThe life quality of RouxenY choledochojejunostomy group is better than that of bridge internal drainage group and PTCD (or ERBD) internal drainage group, the life quality of external drainage is worse than that of the other groups.