west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "胡晓坤" 4 results
  • 后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶减压术患者围手术期的护理

    目的 探讨后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶减压术围手术期的护理要点。 方法 2004年4月-2008年4月,对468例接受后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶减压术患者实施全面的围手术期护理。 结果 468例经后腹腔镜去顶减压术患者术中平均出血量6.28 mL,术后平均下床时间28.07 h,肛门平均排气时间25.18 h,平均引流管拔除时间27.15 h,平均住院8.97 d,平均术后住院天数4.90 d。术后未发生出血,无气胸发生。皮下气肿3例。 结论 后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶减压术围手术期的全面护理可以提高手术成功率,预防术后并发症,缩短住院时间,促进术后康复。

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:49 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Research progress of rehabilitation nursing of diabetic foot

    Diabetic foot is one of the most common complications of diabetes. The incidence of diabetic foot is high and its treatment is difficult. The cost of treating this disease is huge, which brings a huge burden to patients, families, and society. According to the development process of diabetic foot, this article reviews the rehabilitation nursing of diabetic foot from the perspective of rehabilitation nursing problems, intervention measures, and intervention modes. The rehabilitation nursing problems are summarized as body functions, body structures, activities, and participation; the intervention measures involve rehabilitation education, skin nursing, exercise therapy, mental nursing, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, platelet-rich plasma therapy, and rehabilitation aids; the intervention modes include preventive rehabilitation nursing, in-hospital rehabilitation nursing, community and family rehabilitation nursing, and palliative nursing.

    Release date:2020-06-25 07:43 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 泌尿外科手术患者常见引流管的护理

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Rapid and accurate measurement of body temperature in dense population during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

    ObjectiveTo study the method of rapid and accurate measurement of body temperature in dense population during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.MethodsFrom January 27th to February 8th, 2020, subjects were respectively measured with two kinds of non-contact infrared thermometers (blue thermometer and red one) to measure the temperature of forehead, neck, and inner side of forearm under the conditions of 4–6℃ (n=152), 7–10℃ (n=103), and 11–25℃ (n=209), while the temperature of axillary was measured with mercury thermometer under the same conditions. Taking the mercury thermometer temperature as the gold standard, the measurement results with non-contact infrared thermometers were compared.ResultsAt 7–10℃, there was no statistical difference among the forehead temperatures measured by the two non-contact infrared thermometers and the axillary temperature (P>0.05); there was no difference among the temperature measured by blue thermometer on forehead, neck, and inner side of forearm (P>0.05); no difference was found between the temperature measured by the red thermometer on forehead and inner side of forearm (P>0.05), while there was statistical difference between the temperatures measured by the red thermometer on forehead and neck (P<0.05). Under the environment of 11−25℃, there was no statistical difference among the forehead temperatures measured by the two infrared thermometers and the axillary temperature (P>0.05); the difference between the temperatures of forehead and inner side of forearm measured by the blue thermometer was statistically significant (P<0.05), while no difference appeared between the forehead and neck temperatures measured by the blue thermometer (P>0.05); there was no statistical difference among the temperatures of three body regions mentioned above measured by the red thermometer (P>0.05). According to the manual, the allowable fluctuation range of the blue thermometer was 0.3℃, and that of the red one was 0.2℃. The mean differences in measured values between different measured sites of the two products were within the allowable fluctuation range. Therefore, the differences had no clinical significance in the environment of 7–25℃. Under the environment of 4–6℃, the detection rate of blue thermometer was 2.2% and that of the red one was 19.1%.ConclusionsThere is no clinical difference between the temperature measured by mercury thermometer and the temperature measured by temperature guns at 7–10 or 11–25℃, so temperature guns can be widely used. In order to maintain the maximum distance between the measuring and the measured persons and reduce the infection risk, it is recommended to choose the inner forearm for temperature measurement. Under the environment of ambient temperature 4–6℃, the detection rate of non-contact electronic temperature gun is low, requiring taking thermal measures for the instrument.

    Release date:2020-05-26 02:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content