west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "胡朝晖" 5 results
  • 锁定加压钢板治疗Pilon 骨折

    目的 总结采用锁定加压钢板内固定治疗Pilon 骨折的临床疗效。 方法 2005 年6 月- 2008 年5 月,采用锁定加压钢板内固定治疗39 例Pilon 骨折。男19 例,女20 例;年龄21 ~ 83 岁,平均45.3 岁。交通事故伤15 例,高处坠落伤12 例,重物砸伤9 例,跌伤3 例。骨折按Ruedi-Allgower 分型:Ⅰ型3 例,Ⅱ型17 例,Ⅲ型19 例。受伤至入院时间为1 h ~ 7 d,平均38 h。28 例入院后8 h 内手术;11 例伴软组织严重损伤者于2 ~ 14 d 后手术。 结果 术后5 例切口不愈合,经对症处理后愈合;其余切口均Ⅰ期愈合。术后患者均获随访,随访时间12 ~ 30 个月,平均16.3 个月。术后4 个月1 例出现内固定松动,螺钉断裂,予再次固定植骨后愈合。骨折均获临床愈合,愈合时间3 ~ 16 个月,平均6.5 个月。术后12 个月根据美国骨科协会足踝外科分会足与后踝主观评分标准,优13 例,良20 例,可4 例,差2 例,优良率84.6%。 结 论 锁定加压钢板具有良好的稳定性、手术操作简便、对软组织创伤小,是治疗Pilon 骨折的有效方法之一。

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:08 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE BY TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION

    Objective To discuss the key issues in the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative disc disease and thetherapeutic effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on it. Methods From September 2004 to August 2006, 15 cases of degenerative disc disease were treated by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, including 8 males and 7 females with the age of 33-46 years. All cases were single-level degenerative disc diseases, including 1 case of L3,4, 8 cases of L4,5 and 6 cases of L5, S1. The course of the disease was 2 -10 years. Preoperatively, the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) was 8.9 ± 1.8 and the score of Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI) was 51.4 ± 8.3. All patients had received normal conventional treatment for at least 3 months and had no therapeutic effect before operation. Results The operation time was 120-180 minutes (150 minutes on average) and the intra-operative blood loss was 200-500 mL (360 mL on average). There was no severe compl ication, except that the muscle tone of anterior tibia in one case decreased to the third level, which recovered to the 5- level 3 months after operation. A total of 15 cases were followed up for 12-24 months (18 months on average). All patients got interbody bony fusion 12 months after operation with the fusion rate of 100%. Postoperatively, the score of VAS was 2.8 ± 1.6 and the score of ODI was 19.1 ± 3.2, indicating there were significant difference in comparison with postoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). The improvement rates of postoperative VAS and ODI were 61.8% ± 7.3% and 64.3% ± 5.5%, respectively. For the therapeutic effect, 6 cases were regardedas excellent, 8 good, 1 fair, and the choiceness rate was 93.3%. All patients resumed their jobs and normal l ives. Conclusion Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is effective for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease, but the indications for operation must be strictly defined.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:16 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • SURGICAL TREATMENT OF DISCOGENIC LOW BACK PAIN BY MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION COMBINED WITH UNILATERAL PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION

    【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment for discogenic low back pain (DLBP) by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) combined with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF). Methods Between March 2006 and July 2009, 57 patients with single-level DLBP were treated by minimally invasive TLIF combined with UPSF, including 27 males and 30 females with an average age of 45.6 years (range, 38-61 years) and a disease duration of 3.8 years (range, 9 months to 11 years). The involved segments included L2,3 in 2 cases, L3,4 in 5 cases, L4,5 in 29 cases, and L5, S1 in 21 cases. The operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hospitalization times, fusion rate, and complications were observed. The effectiveness were evaluated through Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue score (VAS), and the operative outcomes were compared in different groups classified according to various pressures of the contrast medium and sensitivities to discoblock after inducing consistent pain. Results The operation time, incision length, blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and hospitalization times were (84.6 ± 37.4) minutes, (3.4 ± 0.6) cm, (132.5 ± 23.2) mL, (58.7 ± 21.4) mL, and (6.5 ± 0.8) days, respectively. All patients were followed up 2 years and 2 months to 5 years and 4 months (mean, 3.2 years). At last follow-up, ODI and VAS scores were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05). The effectiveness according to ODI were excellent in 27 cases, good in 22 cases, fair in 6 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 86.0%. All patients acquired b interbody fusion. At last follow-up according to ODI and VAS scores, better results were found in patients of low-pressure sensitive group and high-sensitive discoblock group (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive TLIF combined with UPSF is reliable for DLBP with minimal surgical trauma, less paravertebral tissue injury, and fewer complications, but the indications for operation must be strictly followed. Patients being sensitive to low-pressure or high-sensitive to discoblock can achieve better surgical results.

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:22 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • SURGICAL TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR INSTABILITY BY MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION

    Objective To investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment for single-level degenerative lumbar instabil ity (DLI) by comparing traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with minimally invasive TLIF. Methods Between March 2007 and May 2009,87 patients with single-level DLI were treated by traditional open TLIF (group A, n=45) and by minimally invasive TLIF (group B, n=42), respectively. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, segment level, combined diseases of lumbar spine, or the proportion of uni- and bilateral symptom between 2groups (P gt; 0.05). The indexes of surgical trauma,systemic inflammatory response, cl inical outcomes, and aravertebral muscle injury were compared between 2 groups. Results Operation was performed successfully in all patients. The patients were followed up 2.9 years on average in group A and 2.8 years on average in group B. The incision, blood loss, and postoperative drainage in group B were significantly less than those in group A (P lt; 0.05), but the operation time in group B was significantly longer than that in group A (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in C-reactive protein, leucocyte count, and creatine kinase MM between 2 groups at 24 hours postoperatively as well as in C-reactive protein at 6 days postoperatively; group B was superior to group A. At last follow-up, the Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI) and visual analogue score (VAS) were significantly improved when compared with the preoperative scores in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences in ODI and back pain VAS score (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference in leg pain VAS score (P gt; 0.05) between 2 groups. At last follow-up, no low back pain occurred in 8 and 18 cases, mild in 25 and 18 cases, moderate in 9 and 6 cases, and severe in 3 and 0 cases in groups A and B, respectively, showing that low back pain was significantly l ighter in group B than in group A (Z= —2.574, P=0.010). At last follow-up, the atrophy ratio of multifidus muscle was 37% ± 13% in group A and was 15% ± 7% in group B, showing significant difference (t=12.674, P=0.000). The multifidus muscle atrophy was rated as grade I in 18 and 44 sides, as grade II in 42 and 32 sides, and as grade III in 30 and 8 sides in groups A and B, respectively, showing significant difference (Z= — 4.947, P=0.000). Conclusion Both traditional open TLIF and minimally invasive TLIF are the effective treatments for single-level DLI. Minimally invasive TLIF has less surgical trauma, sl ighter postoperative systemic inflammatory response, less paravertebral muscle injury, and lower incidence of postoperative back pain, but it has longer operation time.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:42 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • ANTERIOR SEGMENTAL DECOMPRESSION AND DOUBLE-PLATE FIXATION FOR TREATMENT OF SKIP CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY

    Objective To evaluate the cl inical outcomes and values of anterior segmental decompression and double-plate fixation (ASDDF) for treatment of ski p cervical spondylotic myelopathy (SCSM). Methods Between June 2005 and June 2008, 17 patients with SCSM were treated with ASDDF. There were 10 males and 7 females with an average age of 58.8 years (range, 41-74 years) and an average disease duration of 9.7 months (range, 6-39 months). According to JapaneseOrthopaedic Association (JOA) score system, 2 patients were rated as extreme severe condition, 7 as severe, 7 as moderate, and 1 as mild. MRI images showed 42 affected cervical disc levels, including 26 disc levels with high-intensity intramedullary lesions on T2, 4 with low-intensity intramedullary lesions on T1, and 12 with significant cord compression but no signal change; according to Nagata classification scale, there were 5 abnormal segments at class I, 21 at class II, and 16 at class III. The rate of fusion, the Cobb angle, and the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine were measured preoperatively and postoperatively by the X-ray examinations. The improvement of the neurological function was evaluated by the JOA score. Results The average time of follow-up was 28.6 months (range, 24-58 months). After operation, dysphagia occurred in 2 cases (symptom rel ief after 1 month), hoarseness in 1 case (symptom rel ief after 3 months of methylcobalamin treatment), and degeneration of adjacent segments without symptom in 3 cases. The X-ray films showed the fusion rate of 100% at 12 months after operation without displacement, resorption or collapse of bone graft, and without breakage or loosening of plate and screw. The Cobb angles were (13.3 ± 10.4)° preoperatively, (15.8 ± 10.8)° immediately postoperatively, and (15.4 ± 11.4)° at last follow-up; the ROM of the cervical spine were (41.3 ± 17.4)° preoperatively and (23.8 ± 18.8)° at last follow-up; and the JOA scores were 8.2 ± 2.9 preoperatively, 13.7 ± 3.0 at 12 months postoperatively, and 13.9 ± 2.8 at last follow-up. All indexes showed significant differences between before operation and after operation (P lt; 0.05). The results of JOA scores were excellent in 8 cases, good in 6, fair in 2, and poor in 1 with an average improvement rate of 66.8% (range, 14%-88%) for the neurological function. Conclusion Adequate decompression, high rate of fusion, sol id mechanical stabil ity, improvement of total cervical lordosis,and the neurological function can be achieved through ASDDF for treatment of SCSM.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:04 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content